Input protection filters out the risks in power converters

source: Electronics Weekly article

Input protection for switched mode inverters and converters affects an increasing number of sectors, writes Martin Keenan of Avnet Abacus.

Switched mode inverters and converters form the heart of many modern power applications including ‘smart’ motor drives, solar power, UPS systems, high power AC-DC converters and many more.

All these applications must meet statutory and practical requirements for input electromagnetic interference (EMI) filtering and protection against injury to personnel or damage to equipment.

A typical requirement for a power converter starts with a list of statutory standards for safety and electromagnetic compatibility (EMC). ‘Volts and amps’ come way down the list and are sometimes not even known for certain.

Standard definitions
At least safety and EMC specifications can be defined early on.

Safety is often the IT standard UL/EN 60950-1 – or its upcoming replacement EN62368-1 – and EMC is often the EN61000 series covering conducted and radiated emissions; immunity to transients and surges on the power lines; and immunity to electromagnetic radiation and electrostatic discharge.

Particular applications such as medical or motor drives have their own specifications, often based on these standards.

Input filtering to meet the EMC specifications needs to be designed with an eye on safety, as the requirements can be interdependent. For example, filtering protects against transients that could damage safety insulation and AC leakage current requirements restrict the value of some EMC components. An ideal input filter takes all this into account without degrading the basic functionality of the converter.

Figure 1: A schematic illustrating the structure of a typical input filter

A simplistic filter design, such as shown in Figure 1 above, takes all the requirements one by one and includes discrete components to meet the overall specification.

In the schematic, Figure 1 the functions are:

The EMI limits for conducted interference, typically using standard CISPR22 and its derivative EN55022, use a test setup using a line impedance stabiliser network (LISN) (Figure 2) which registers the addition and subtraction of differential and common mode currents, so a filter must adequately attenuate both CM and DM noise to meet the limits.

Power, line impedance stabiliser network

Figure 2: A schematic illustrating the structure of a line impedance stabiliser network

At low power, filtering is often minimal. A peek inside a modern mobile phone charger, for example, will show few specific EMC components while still meeting statutory requirements.

The push for lower cost and simplicity has driven design techniques to minimise EMI at source by using ‘soft switching’ and optimum layout for EMC. CM noise, for example, often results when current from switching devices couples into grounded heatsinks. If a primary heatsink can be isolated from ground, AC mains leakage is also reduced, an example of safety and EMC interacting.

A typical filter explained
At low power, T1 is often unnecessary, but could be wound with high leakage inductance to effectively include L1 and L2.

A fusible resistor can combine R1 and FS1, and C2 may be omitted, depending on EMI levels. Meanwhile, VAR1 could be omitted depending on the circuit impedances and application environment.

In ‘Class II’ or earth-free applications, C3 and C4 would not be fitted although similar capacitors may be fitted from input 0V to output ground.

So let us consider the function of each component in turn:

Commercially available products suitable for elements of filter networks include TDK-EPCOS’ series S, E2/E3(K1) and Q for varistors, S364x and S464x for thermistors, B3292x for X2 capacitors and B3202x for Y2 capacitors.

They provide the B8245/6/7/8 series of common mode chokes, while their range of ferrite cores can be used for custom solutions.

Complete filter modules are also available in, for example, TDK’s B84143 series.

Exit mobile version