How Transformer Works

In this video prof. Sam Ben-Yaakov provides deep examination of inner transformer process to understand how transformer works in details.

Transformer is a basic device that is used in many electrical, electronic and power electronic systems. It is used in multiple applications for power transfer and sensing.

It would seem however, that since we take it for granted, some might have lost the understanding how exactly does the transformer transfer voltage, power and in particular current.

This presentation video dives into inner working of the transformer using simulation tools.

Introduction

Transformers are foundational components in electrical and power electronics systems, yet their internal mechanisms—particularly the interplay between voltage, current, flux, and magnetomotive force (MMF)—are often misunderstood. This presentation explores the inner workings of transformers using reluctance-based magnetic circuit modeling and LTspice simulations, offering a deeper understanding of how energy transfer and magnetization occur.

Key Points

Reluctance Modeling of Magnetic Circuits

The transformer core is modeled as a magnetic circuit using the concept of reluctance, analogous to electrical resistance. The MMF is treated as a voltage source, reluctance as resistance, and magnetic flux as current. This analogy enables simulation using standard circuit tools like LTspice.

The reluctance \( \mathcal{R} \) is defined as: $$ \mathcal{R} = \frac{l}{\mu A} $$

Where:

For a core with \( l = 5\,cm \), \( A = 1\,cm^2 \), and \( \mu_r = 5000 \), the reluctance becomes: $$ \mathcal{R} = \frac{0.05}{(5000 \cdot 1.25 \times 10^{-6}) \cdot 1 \times 10^{-4}} \approx 80,000\,\text{A/Wb} $$

Flux and MMF Relationship

The magnetic flux \( \Phi \) is governed by both Faraday’s Law and Ampère’s Law, leading to an apparent contradiction: $$ \Phi = \frac{1}{N} \int V\,dt \quad \text{(Faraday)} $$ $$ \Phi = \frac{NI}{\mathcal{R}} \quad \text{(Ampère)} $$

This duality is resolved by modeling the magnetic circuit explicitly, showing that voltage induces flux, which in turn generates MMF and current. The simulation confirms that flux lags voltage by 90°, indicating purely reactive power in unloaded conditions.

Simulation of Magnetization

Using LTspice, a one-turn inductor is excited by a sinusoidal voltage source. The resulting flux, MMF, and current are analyzed. The simulation shows:

ParameterValueUnits
Peak Current0.5mA
Peak-to-Peak Flux320nWb
Inductance31mH

These values match theoretical predictions, validating the reluctance model.

Power Transfer in Loaded Transformer

Adding a secondary winding with a resistive load introduces real power transfer. The simulation reveals:

The MMFs of primary and secondary oppose each other, with a small difference driving the magnetization flux. This explains why input current exceeds output current slightly—due to magnetization requirements.

MMF Balance and Flux Drive

The difference in MMF between primary and secondary is responsible for sustaining flux:

$$ \Delta \text{MMF} = MMF_{primary} – MMF_{secondary} $$

This difference is small but essential. It corresponds to the magnetization current and is independent of load, governed by core reluctance.

Impact of DC Bias

Introducing DC to the secondary causes flux offset, increasing the risk of core saturation. For example:

ConditionFlux
Without DC330 nWb
With 100 mA DC2.8 µWb

This highlights the importance of avoiding DC bias in transformer applications.

Conclusion

This paper demonstrates that transformer behavior is governed by two orthogonal processes: voltage-induced flux and current-induced MMF. Reluctance modeling and simulation reveal the subtleties of magnetization, power transfer, and MMF balance. Understanding these principles is essential for accurate transformer design and analysis, especially in high-frequency or precision applications.

Exit mobile version