Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • NewsFilter
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest

    Samsung Releases Automotive Molded 2220 1kV C0G MLCC

    How to Select Ferrite Bead for Filtering in Buck Boost Converter

    VINATech Offers Smallest 100µF Al-Hybrid Capacitor

    Vishay Unveils SMD 1200V PTC Thermistors in Compact Size

    Power Inductors Future: Minimal Losses and Compact Designs

    Bourns Unveils Automotive 3 Watt Gate Driver Transformer

    Murata Opens EMC Test Lab in Nuremberg to Enhance Automotive Support

    Percolation Phenomenon: Degradation of Molded Power Inductors in DC/DC Converters

    Molex Acquires Smiths Interconnect

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • VideoFilter
    • All
    • Antenna videos
    • Capacitor videos
    • Circuit Protection Video
    • Filter videos
    • Fuse videos
    • Inductor videos
    • Inter-Connect Video
    • Non-linear passives videos
    • Oscillator videos
    • Passive sensors videos
    • Resistor videos

    How to Select Ferrite Bead for Filtering in Buck Boost Converter

    Power Inductors Future: Minimal Losses and Compact Designs

    Percolation Phenomenon: Degradation of Molded Power Inductors in DC/DC Converters

    Connector PCB Design Challenges

    Efficient Power Converters: Duty Cycle vs Conduction Losses

    Ripple Steering in Coupled Inductors: SEPIC Case

    SEPIC Converter with Coupled and Uncoupled Inductors

    Coupled Inductors in SEPIC versus Flyback Converters

    Non-Linear MLCC Class II Capacitor Measurements Challenges

    Trending Tags

    • Capacitors explained
    • Inductors explained
    • Resistors explained
    • Filters explained
    • Application Video Guidelines
    • EMC
    • New Products
    • Ripple Current
    • Simulation
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
  • Knowledge Blog
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • PCNS
    • PCNS 2025
    • PCNS 2023
    • PCNS 2021
    • PCNS 2019
    • PCNS 2017
  • Events
  • Home
  • NewsFilter
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest

    Samsung Releases Automotive Molded 2220 1kV C0G MLCC

    How to Select Ferrite Bead for Filtering in Buck Boost Converter

    VINATech Offers Smallest 100µF Al-Hybrid Capacitor

    Vishay Unveils SMD 1200V PTC Thermistors in Compact Size

    Power Inductors Future: Minimal Losses and Compact Designs

    Bourns Unveils Automotive 3 Watt Gate Driver Transformer

    Murata Opens EMC Test Lab in Nuremberg to Enhance Automotive Support

    Percolation Phenomenon: Degradation of Molded Power Inductors in DC/DC Converters

    Molex Acquires Smiths Interconnect

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • VideoFilter
    • All
    • Antenna videos
    • Capacitor videos
    • Circuit Protection Video
    • Filter videos
    • Fuse videos
    • Inductor videos
    • Inter-Connect Video
    • Non-linear passives videos
    • Oscillator videos
    • Passive sensors videos
    • Resistor videos

    How to Select Ferrite Bead for Filtering in Buck Boost Converter

    Power Inductors Future: Minimal Losses and Compact Designs

    Percolation Phenomenon: Degradation of Molded Power Inductors in DC/DC Converters

    Connector PCB Design Challenges

    Efficient Power Converters: Duty Cycle vs Conduction Losses

    Ripple Steering in Coupled Inductors: SEPIC Case

    SEPIC Converter with Coupled and Uncoupled Inductors

    Coupled Inductors in SEPIC versus Flyback Converters

    Non-Linear MLCC Class II Capacitor Measurements Challenges

    Trending Tags

    • Capacitors explained
    • Inductors explained
    • Resistors explained
    • Filters explained
    • Application Video Guidelines
    • EMC
    • New Products
    • Ripple Current
    • Simulation
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
  • Knowledge Blog
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • PCNS
    • PCNS 2025
    • PCNS 2023
    • PCNS 2021
    • PCNS 2019
    • PCNS 2017
  • Events
No Result
View All Result
Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result

Tech Companies Sued Over Minerals-Sourcing Practices

26.12.2019
Reading Time: 5 mins read
A A
Mid-section portrait of two industrial workers wearing reflective jackets, one of them African, inspecting mineral ore on site outdoors and using digital tablet

Mid-section portrait of two industrial workers wearing reflective jackets, one of them African, inspecting mineral ore on site outdoors and using digital tablet

Although conflict minerals disclosure is no longer enforced in the United States, a recent lawsuit may reignite the debate over the sourcing of materials widely used in electronics. Families of children killed or injured while mining for cobalt in the Congo have filed a lawsuit against the world’s largest tech companies, including Google and Apple,…

Families of children killed or injured while mining for cobalt in the Congo have filed a lawsuit against the world’s largest tech companies, including Google and Apple, according to court documents.

RelatedPosts

Samsung Releases Automotive Molded 2220 1kV C0G MLCC

How to Select Ferrite Bead for Filtering in Buck Boost Converter

VINATech Offers Smallest 100µF Al-Hybrid Capacitor

Advocates have been lobbying to add cobalt to a “conflict minerals list” that currently includes tantalum, tin, tungsten and gold (3TG). These minerals, widely used in passive components, batteries, solders and finished electronics products, are sourced from regions that use slave-and-child labor to mine them. The sale of these minerals, in turn, funds terrorist activities and human-rights abuses in these war-torn regions.

The U.S. rule – part of the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act – discourages the sourcing of 3TG from areas of conflict. Electronics companies have reverse-engineered their supply chains to identify, then eliminate, certain sources of these materials. To date, the industry has been considered highly compliant.

The lawsuit, which also named Dell, Microsoft and Tesla as defendants, was filed in Washington, DC, by human rights group International Rights Advocates. Fourteen families have accused the tech firms of aiding and abetting forced labor practices in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC).

According to the lawsuit, Apple, Alphabet, Dell, Microsoft and Tesla all “knowingly aided and abetted and benefited enormously from a system that forces impoverished children, including the plaintiffs and others similarly situated, to perform extremely hazardous work without safety equipment of any kind for less than subsistence wages in order to barely eke out a minimal human existence.”

The lawsuit marks the first legal challenge of its kind against technology companies, many of which rely on their cobalt supply chains to power products like electric cars, smartphones and laptops.

Conflicts minerals in the U.S.

Under Dodd-Frank, the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) was charged with overseeing publicly-traded companies’ conflict-minerals compliance. Although the rule – which simply requires the  presence of these materials  be disclosed — hadn’t been tested, penalties were the main means of enforcement.

In 2017, Acting SEC Commissioner Michael Piwowar implied that the SEC would cease enforcement of the due diligence and audit requirements of the conflict minerals rule, rendering it largely toothless. Many electronics companies, however, continue to comply. Tech companies have committed to corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives that support the environment and human rights. Additionally, Dodd-Frank carries with it the risk of reputational damage via  public shaming.

International Rights Advocates claim, in the family lawsuit, “the supply chain is, by design, hidden and secretive to allow all participants to profit from cheap cobalt mined under extremely hazardous conditions by desperate children forced to perform extremely hazardous labor.”

Electronics companies and associations have done extensive research into the 3TG supply chain and have developed databases, auditing tools, approved supplier lists and a wide range of transparency and compliance practices. Cobalt is not included in Dodd-Frank but organization such as the Responsible Minerals Initiative are spearheading the effort for inclusion.

“Defendants know and have known for a significant period of time the reality that DRC’s cobalt mining sector is dependent upon children, with males performing the most hazardous work in the primitive cobalt mines, including tunnel digging,” according to the lawsuit.

Given all the publicly available information, these companies “reasonably should have known” about the abuses taking place in their cobalt supply chains. Computer Weekly (CW) cited UK and Chinese companies associated with suspected abuse.

Microsoft was unable to remark on ongoing legal cases, according to CW, and Apple, Google, Dell and Tesla did not immediately respond to inquiries. Advocacy organizations contacted by EPSNews said it was not appropriate to comment on ongoing litigation.

Global expansion efforts

The conflict minerals movement is expanding internationally. In the European context, the EU Conflict Minerals Regulation is set to come into force on 1 January 2021, which will attempt to stem the tide of 3TG conflict minerals from across the globe by introducing stricter measures for downstream companies, like those named in the lawsuit.

The 3TG minerals and cobalt were included in the U.S. Department of Labor’s 2018 list of goods produced by child labor or forced labor, which explicitly states these minerals are coming from the DRC.

Cobalt, however, is not currently covered in the scope of the proposed EU regulation, and although the regulation is set to introduce a mandatory due diligence framework, it is unclear now if this will be accompanied by any legal penalties for non-compliance.

“None of them actually perform the required due diligence to verify whether children are mining cobalt in their supply chains,” said the complaint.

According to the Harvard Business Review, which analyzed every conflict minerals report submitted to the SEC, most multinational corporations – some 80 percent – are still not sure where the raw materials they use come from. Only 1 percent of the enterprises were able to declare that their products were conflict-free beyond reasonable doubt.

The complaint also pointed out that the technology companies in question claim to the public that their policies and practices are designed to prevent forced or child labor.

Critics of such claims say they are largely voluntary and based on self-reporting, as are the various industry coalitions that were set up to eliminate the use of conflict minerals.

“I think the big companies are just hiding behind these naïve certification processes, especially in conflict minerals,” one expert told Computer Weekly. “If you talk to the big companies, they will say it’s not an issue because we have these [certifications], or the smelters have these certifications – but the problem is not at the smelter, it is on the ground in the DRC,” he said.

“As soon as one of these companies goes out and does a big audit of their supply chain, we all know what they’re going to find. It’s an open secret in the conflict mineral space – they’re going to find that it’s not good, and so their solution is should we just keep playing the game and be complicit.”

However, many companies remain committed to the effort. In the buildup to Dodd-Frank, enacted in 2012, the electronics industry spent an estimated $7.93 billion and countless “man-hours”’ on conflict-minerals compliance. Companies that have publicly committed to CSR principals are closely watched by compliance advocates, the media, and each other. A company that discovers non-compliance by a competitor could “weaponize” that information.

It’s also possible that investor concern is inspiring action. Nearly 50 different investor groups — under the Alliance for Human Rights and represent $1.2 trillion in assets —  have pushed for the continued support of the rule.

The debate over conflict minerals enforcement has largely abated since the 2017 SEC opinion and the onset of the U.S.-China trade war. However, if courts or governments define – and test – penalties for non-compliance, companies can be held accountable for their sourcing decisions.

Related

Source: EPS News

Recent Posts

Murata Opens EMC Test Lab in Nuremberg to Enhance Automotive Support

22.10.2025
8

Molex Acquires Smiths Interconnect

21.10.2025
3

September 2025 ECIA US Components Sales Sentiment Continues in Optimism

20.10.2025
13

Vishay Expanded Inductor Portfolio With More Than 2000 Stock Items 

8.10.2025
23

Paumanok Releases Capacitor Foils Market Report 2025-2030

7.10.2025
30

Advancements in Flexible End Terminations for Robust MLCCs in EV

26.9.2025
49

Passive Components J-STD-075 Process Sensitivity Level Classification And Labeling

25.9.2025
73

AI Hardware Development and Its Consequences for Passive Electronic Components

23.10.2025
123

Samtec Agreed with Molex Second-Source License on High-Speed Interconnects for Data Centers

18.9.2025
24

August 2025 ECIA US Components Sales Sentiment Remains Strong

18.9.2025
46

Upcoming Events

Oct 20
October 20 - October 23

Digital WE Days 2025 – Virtual Conference

Oct 28
8:00 - 15:00 CET

Power Up Your Design: SN6507 and the Ready-to-Use Development Kit

Oct 30
11:00 - 12:00 CET

Space Ceramic Capacitors with Flexible Testing

View Calendar

Popular Posts

  • Buck Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Boost Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Flyback Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • LLC Resonant Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Ripple Current and its Effects on the Performance of Capacitors

    3 shares
    Share 3 Tweet 0
  • What is a Dielectric Constant and DF of Plastic Materials?

    4 shares
    Share 4 Tweet 0
  • SEPIC Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Dual Active Bridge (DAB) Topology

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • MLCC and Ceramic Capacitors

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Flying Capacitors

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Newsletter Subscription

 

Passive Components Blog

© EPCI - Leading Passive Components Educational and Information Site

  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • EPCI Membership & Advertisement
  • About

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Knowledge Blog
  • PCNS

© EPCI - Leading Passive Components Educational and Information Site

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.
Go to mobile version