Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • NewsFilter
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest

    Molecular Memristor Shows Record 145 kH Emergent Inductance

    Planar vs Conventional Transformer: When it Make Sense

    Researchers Propose Next‑Gen Compact Memory Using Ultra-thin Ferroelectric Capacitors

    Nichicon ADN Automotive Hybrid Aluminum Capacitors Now Available in EMEA

    Wk 19 Electronics Supply Chain Digest

    Electrocaloric Multilayer Capacitors: Towards Quiet, Solid‑State Cooling Around Room Temperature

    High-Crystallinity Nanocrystalline Composites for MHz Chip Inductors

    European Components Distribution Shows Strong Q1 2026 Growth Amid Geopolitical Uncertainty

    Stackpole Expanded its AlN Thick Film Chip Resistors

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • VideoFilter
    • All
    • Antenna videos
    • Capacitor videos
    • Circuit Protection Video
    • Filter videos
    • Fuse videos
    • Inductor videos
    • Inter-Connect Video
    • Non-linear passives videos
    • Oscillator videos
    • Passive sensors videos
    • Resistor videos

    Planar vs Conventional Transformer: When it Make Sense

    Modeling Fringing Field Losses in Inductors & Transformers

    Why Power Inductors Use a Ferrite Core With an Air Gap

    Transformer-Based Power-Line Harvester Magnetic Design

    Thermal Modeling of Magnetics

    Standard vs Planar LLC transformers Comparison for Battery Chargers

    How Modern Tools Model Magnetic Components for Power Electronics

    Advanced Loss Modeling for Planar Magnetics in the Frenetic Planar Tool

    2026 Power Magnetics Design Trends: Flyback, DAB and Planar

    Trending Tags

    • Capacitors explained
    • Inductors explained
    • Resistors explained
    • Filters explained
    • Application Video Guidelines
    • EMC
    • New Products
    • Ripple Current
    • Simulation
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
  • Knowledge Blog
  • DossiersNew
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • PCNS
    • PCNS 2025
    • PCNS 2023
    • PCNS 2021
    • PCNS 2019
    • PCNS 2017
  • Events
  • Home
  • NewsFilter
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest

    Molecular Memristor Shows Record 145 kH Emergent Inductance

    Planar vs Conventional Transformer: When it Make Sense

    Researchers Propose Next‑Gen Compact Memory Using Ultra-thin Ferroelectric Capacitors

    Nichicon ADN Automotive Hybrid Aluminum Capacitors Now Available in EMEA

    Wk 19 Electronics Supply Chain Digest

    Electrocaloric Multilayer Capacitors: Towards Quiet, Solid‑State Cooling Around Room Temperature

    High-Crystallinity Nanocrystalline Composites for MHz Chip Inductors

    European Components Distribution Shows Strong Q1 2026 Growth Amid Geopolitical Uncertainty

    Stackpole Expanded its AlN Thick Film Chip Resistors

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • VideoFilter
    • All
    • Antenna videos
    • Capacitor videos
    • Circuit Protection Video
    • Filter videos
    • Fuse videos
    • Inductor videos
    • Inter-Connect Video
    • Non-linear passives videos
    • Oscillator videos
    • Passive sensors videos
    • Resistor videos

    Planar vs Conventional Transformer: When it Make Sense

    Modeling Fringing Field Losses in Inductors & Transformers

    Why Power Inductors Use a Ferrite Core With an Air Gap

    Transformer-Based Power-Line Harvester Magnetic Design

    Thermal Modeling of Magnetics

    Standard vs Planar LLC transformers Comparison for Battery Chargers

    How Modern Tools Model Magnetic Components for Power Electronics

    Advanced Loss Modeling for Planar Magnetics in the Frenetic Planar Tool

    2026 Power Magnetics Design Trends: Flyback, DAB and Planar

    Trending Tags

    • Capacitors explained
    • Inductors explained
    • Resistors explained
    • Filters explained
    • Application Video Guidelines
    • EMC
    • New Products
    • Ripple Current
    • Simulation
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
  • Knowledge Blog
  • DossiersNew
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • PCNS
    • PCNS 2025
    • PCNS 2023
    • PCNS 2021
    • PCNS 2019
    • PCNS 2017
  • Events
No Result
View All Result
Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result

Fix poor capacitor, inductor, and DC/DC impedance measurements

8.6.2016
Reading Time: 6 mins read
A A

source: EDN article

Steve Sandler -June 07, 2016
When designing or optimizing a VRM (voltage Regulation Module), we need its output impedance data and impedance data for the filter inductors and capacitors for us to have complete simulation models. Unfortunately, vendor data on these components is often incomplete, erroneous, or difficult to decipher in terms of the setup involved to make the measurement. Thus, we often need to collect the data ourselves.

RelatedPosts

Molecular Memristor Shows Record 145 kH Emergent Inductance

Planar vs Conventional Transformer: When it Make Sense

Researchers Propose Next‑Gen Compact Memory Using Ultra-thin Ferroelectric Capacitors

The measurements need to be performed over the entire frequency range of interest, typically from a few kiloHertz to about 1 GHz, depending on the application. Because of this very wide frequency range, we generally turn to S-parameter based measurements. High performance simulators can directly incorporate the S-parameter component measurements in AC, DC, transient, and harmonic balance simulations while including the finite element PCB models.

While extremely useful, standard S-parameter measurements frequently aren’t sufficient. What’s really needed is an extended range, that is, a partial S2p measurement. I’ll explain why you need it and how to make this improved measurement.

S-parameters are a simple method of performing measurements over a very wide frequency range. The measurement is performed using a fixed resistance port rather than a high impedance probe. Two options are available for measuring impedance with S-parameters. One option is a reflection measurement and the other option is THRU measurement.

One port or two? Why partial?
The reflection, or 1-port, measurement is the simplest because it requires only one cable. But, it also requires a complex calibration, generally consisting of an OPEN calibration, a SHORT calibration, and a LOAD or MATCH calibration of the port used for the measurement. Most VNA’s (vector network analyzers) include the transformation from the S-parameter reflection measurement (S11 or S22) to impedance, but it’s quite simple. Using port 1 as an example, the reflection for a given reference impedance, Zref, (typically 50 Ω) the relationship between S11 and the device impedance is shown in Table 1.

Table 1. 1-Port Transformations

We can perform a 2-port measurement by placing the device to be measured either in series with or in shunt with the measurement ports. Table 2 shows the relationship between S21 and the device impedance for both the series and shunt configuration.

Table 2. 2-Port Transformations.

DC Ground Loop
An additional issue arises for the 2-port shunt-thru measurement due to a DC ground loop, which occurs as a result of the RF ground at the VNA and the series resistance of the interconnecting measurement cables. The Keysight E5061B VNA has a semi-floating input on the low frequency gain-phase ports, eliminating this DC ground loop for low impedance measurements up to 30 MHz. For the E5061B high frequency ports and other VNAs in general, the DC ground loop must be minimized using a common-mode coaxial transformer such as the Picotest J2102A. Otherwise, the low frequency measurements will be inaccurate.

The setup diagrams for these impedance measurement options are shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Basic Schematics for the 1-port and 2-port impedance measurements.

The simulations in Figure 2 show the S-parameter magnitude for each measurement technique as a function of the device impedance. All measurements lose sensitivity as the S-parameter magnitude approaches 1.0

Figure 2. S-parameter magnitude as a function of the device impedance.

Figure 3 shows a higher resolution view of the S parameter magnitude from 0.95 to 1.0.

Figure 3. Higher resolution view of the S-parameter magnitude as a function of the device impedance.

Setting the measurable S-parameter (either S11, S22 or S21) to a minimum of 40E-6 allows for a reasonable signal-to-noise margin and a maximum of 0.95. The ranges for each measurement are shown in Table 3.

Table 3. Measurement Impedance ranges.

Which range do we need?
Because we’re typically measuring VRMs, PDN’s (power distribution networks), capacitors, and inductors, the minimum impedance measurement is in the milliOhms range—whether it is inductor DCR (DC resistance), VRM output impedance, or capacitor ESR (equivalent series resistance). This requires the 2-port shunt measurement.

The measured S-parameter file must be valid for the complete simulation frequency range. Establishing the measurement range to be from 1 kHz to 500 MHz and using what I call the “realistic measurement range,” we can determine the maximum inductance or capacitance that can be measured using the 2-port shunt measurement.

Using the 2-port shunt measurement, the minimum capacitance that can be measured is 800 nF, precluding the measurement of high-frequency decoupling capacitors. The maximum inductance that can be measured at 500 MHz is only 60 nH. Even if the inductor is assumed to have a resonant frequency of 100 MHz, the maximum inductance that can be measured is less than 1 µH, precluding the measurement of ferrite beads and most output filter inductors.

Another issue arises in making this measurement. S21, S11, and S22 are all measuring the same device and therefore the same impedance range. As explained above, the S11 and S22 measurements fall below the range of the 1-port measurement. For example, while measuring an inductor, the DCR will be measured as S11 and S22. While measuring a capacitor, the ESR will be measured using S11 and S22. These 1-port terms will be invalid at low impedance levels typical of the devices. That’s why we need a “partial” 2-port thru measurement. We will only keep the S21 term and remove the S11 and S22 terms because they’re invalid at impedance levels below 0.5 Ω.

Some instruments allow saving the measurement as a Touchstone impedance file, which is a partial 2-port s-parameter file.

Extending the 2-port range
We can scale the measurement using series resistors, effectively increasing the port’s reference impedance. That lets us measure the decoupling capacitors and larger inductors. Figure 4  shows the results of this measurement.

Figure 4. Adding series resistors to extend the impedance range of the 2-port shunt measurement.

For example, adding a 450 Ω series resistor makes the reference impedance 500 Ω, shifting the measurement range up by a factor of 10. In some cases, the added series resistors can be accommodated by using an attenuating transmission line oscilloscope probe. Scaling factors of 1, 5, 10 and 20 are commercially available as 1-port probes. A pair of probes can be used to make a 2-port extended range measurement. The measurement range for various values of series resistors are shown in Table 4.

Table 4. Measurement Impedance ranges for various series resistor values.

The impedance transformation with the series resistors included is shown in Table 5.

Table 5. Impedance transformation including series resistors.

For measurements at either extreme of the measurement range, be sure to perform a full fixture removal calibration or full 1 port calibration on both parts as well as a THRU calibration. If series resistors are included, perform the THRU calibration with the series resistors included in the setup.A 0.1 µF ceramic capacitor is used as an example of the extended range two port impedance measurement. The results are shown up to 30 MHz in Figure 5. The impedance measurement spans the range of more than 1 kΩ and below the 9 mΩ ESR.

Figure 5. Measurement of a 0.1 µF capacitor with RS=200 Ω.

Higher frequency, low impedance measurements are very sensitive to even very small fixture inductance and at high frequency, high impedance measurements are very sensitive to even very small fixture capacitance. A smaller, 1 nF capacitor can eb measured at frequencies up to 1 GHz. Figure 6 shows the results.

Figure 6. The plot shows a measurement of of a 1 nF capacitor at frequenies up to 1 GHz. The resonance results from the capacitor ESL combined with the SMA connector capacitance of approximately 1 pF.

The 850 MHz resonance is the result of approximately 1 pF of excess capacitance from the low-quality SMA connectors. To accurately measure at these frequencies, we need better connectors and/or the excess capacitance needs to be calibrated out of the measurement.

Conclusion
The extended range technique and saving the S21 data only or a Touchstone Z data file provides a method of scaling the measurement to optimize the measurement window. Added benefits are that the extension resistors reduce the loading when measuring lower power VRM’s. This technique can also be used for measuring the output impedance of voltage references and closed loop op-amps and is supported by the Picotest non-invasive stability measurement as well.

Related

Recent Posts

Planar vs Conventional Transformer: When it Make Sense

11.5.2026
29

Researchers Propose Next‑Gen Compact Memory Using Ultra-thin Ferroelectric Capacitors

11.5.2026
24

Nichicon ADN Automotive Hybrid Aluminum Capacitors Now Available in EMEA

11.5.2026
21

Electrocaloric Multilayer Capacitors: Towards Quiet, Solid‑State Cooling Around Room Temperature

7.5.2026
182

High-Crystallinity Nanocrystalline Composites for MHz Chip Inductors

7.5.2026
61

KYOCERA 10 µF 0201 MLCC Brings High‑Capacitance into Mobile Designs

6.5.2026
50

Würth Elektronik Introduces Compact Flat-wire SMT Power Inductors for Automotive

5.5.2026
48

Energy Localization in Tantalum Anode Formation: A Structural Perspective

4.5.2026
46

YAGEO Introduces C0G Flexible Termination Automotive MLCCs

30.4.2026
40

Upcoming Events

May 13
17:00 - 17:30 CEST

Winding Loss Modeling for Toroidal Magnetics – Including Gapped Cores

May 19
16:00 - 17:00 CEST

Designing Qi2 Wireless Power Systems: Practical Development and EMC Optimization

Jun 2
16:00 - 17:00 CEST

Calculation, Simulation and Measurement of 800V EMC Filters

View Calendar

Popular Posts

  • Buck Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Boost Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Flyback Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • LLC Resonant Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • MLCC and Ceramic Capacitors

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Dual Active Bridge (DAB) Topology

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • What Electronics Engineer Needs to Know About Passive Low Pass Filters

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Capacitor Charging and Discharging

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Ripple Current and its Effects on the Performance of Capacitors

    3 shares
    Share 3 Tweet 0
  • MLCC Case Sizes Standards Explained

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Newsletter Subscription

 

Passive Components Blog

© EPCI - Leading Passive Components Educational and Information Site

  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • EPCI Membership & Advertisement
  • About

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Knowledge Blog
  • PCNS

© EPCI - Leading Passive Components Educational and Information Site

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.
Go to mobile version