Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • NewsFilter
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest

    Samsung Introduced Low ESL 3-Terminal Reverse-Geometry MLCCs for High-Performance ADAS

    Würth Elektronik Presents New Bidirectional Digital Isolators

    Using Stress–Strain Curves to Diagnose Tantalum Powders for Capacitors

    Coilcraft Introduces SMT Current Sense Transformers for High‑Performance Power Electronics

    Samsung Launches Ultra-Compact 008004 High Q MLCC for Next-Generation RF Applications

    Nichicon Extends Rechargeable Batteries Temperature to Rival Supercapacitors

    Two‑capacitor paradox explained for engineers

    YAGEO Releases Compact RJ45 Connector for Multi‑Gigabit Ethernet

    Circuit Protection Technology Annual Dossier

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • VideoFilter
    • All
    • Antenna videos
    • Capacitor videos
    • Circuit Protection Video
    • Filter videos
    • Fuse videos
    • Inductor videos
    • Inter-Connect Video
    • Non-linear passives videos
    • Oscillator videos
    • Passive sensors videos
    • Resistor videos

    Two‑capacitor paradox explained for engineers

    Capacitances of Nonlinear MLCCs: What Datasheets Don’t Tell You

    Tapped Inductor Buck Converter Fundamentals

    Planar vs Conventional Transformer: When it Make Sense

    Modeling Fringing Field Losses in Inductors & Transformers

    Why Power Inductors Use a Ferrite Core With an Air Gap

    Transformer-Based Power-Line Harvester Magnetic Design

    Thermal Modeling of Magnetics

    Standard vs Planar LLC transformers Comparison for Battery Chargers

    Trending Tags

    • Capacitors explained
    • Inductors explained
    • Resistors explained
    • Filters explained
    • Application Video Guidelines
    • EMC
    • New Products
    • Ripple Current
    • Simulation
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
  • Knowledge Blog
  • DossiersNew
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • PCNS
    • PCNS 2025
    • PCNS 2023
    • PCNS 2021
    • PCNS 2019
    • PCNS 2017
  • Events
  • Home
  • NewsFilter
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest

    Samsung Introduced Low ESL 3-Terminal Reverse-Geometry MLCCs for High-Performance ADAS

    Würth Elektronik Presents New Bidirectional Digital Isolators

    Using Stress–Strain Curves to Diagnose Tantalum Powders for Capacitors

    Coilcraft Introduces SMT Current Sense Transformers for High‑Performance Power Electronics

    Samsung Launches Ultra-Compact 008004 High Q MLCC for Next-Generation RF Applications

    Nichicon Extends Rechargeable Batteries Temperature to Rival Supercapacitors

    Two‑capacitor paradox explained for engineers

    YAGEO Releases Compact RJ45 Connector for Multi‑Gigabit Ethernet

    Circuit Protection Technology Annual Dossier

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • VideoFilter
    • All
    • Antenna videos
    • Capacitor videos
    • Circuit Protection Video
    • Filter videos
    • Fuse videos
    • Inductor videos
    • Inter-Connect Video
    • Non-linear passives videos
    • Oscillator videos
    • Passive sensors videos
    • Resistor videos

    Two‑capacitor paradox explained for engineers

    Capacitances of Nonlinear MLCCs: What Datasheets Don’t Tell You

    Tapped Inductor Buck Converter Fundamentals

    Planar vs Conventional Transformer: When it Make Sense

    Modeling Fringing Field Losses in Inductors & Transformers

    Why Power Inductors Use a Ferrite Core With an Air Gap

    Transformer-Based Power-Line Harvester Magnetic Design

    Thermal Modeling of Magnetics

    Standard vs Planar LLC transformers Comparison for Battery Chargers

    Trending Tags

    • Capacitors explained
    • Inductors explained
    • Resistors explained
    • Filters explained
    • Application Video Guidelines
    • EMC
    • New Products
    • Ripple Current
    • Simulation
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
  • Knowledge Blog
  • DossiersNew
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • PCNS
    • PCNS 2025
    • PCNS 2023
    • PCNS 2021
    • PCNS 2019
    • PCNS 2017
  • Events
No Result
View All Result
Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result

Integrated Cable-Based Flexible Supercapacitors for Energy Harvesting Technologies in IoT

15.3.2021
Reading Time: 5 mins read
A A

Supercapacitors have become increasingly attractive solutions for energy harvesting technologies. Capacitech is manufacturing flexible supercapacitor, the Cable-Based Capacitor (CBC), that provides space saving advantages over traditional supercapacitor technologies.

Energy harvesting technologies, such as indoor solar cells, are gaining popularity in battery powered Internet of Things (IoT) devices, commonly found in applications like wearables and SmartCity ecosystems. The reason is simple, it is expensive to replace batteries in IoT devices and energy harvesting technologies can be leveraged to make those same IoT devices battery free. It is so expensive to replace these batteries because there are typically many devices deployed over a large area, and these IoT devices are typically used on the edge (a.k.a hard to reach places).

RelatedPosts

Samsung Introduced Low ESL 3-Terminal Reverse-Geometry MLCCs for High-Performance ADAS

Würth Elektronik Presents New Bidirectional Digital Isolators

Using Stress–Strain Curves to Diagnose Tantalum Powders for Capacitors

Energy Harvesting Technology

There are several types of energy harvesting technologies common to the market. According to Magnetic Nanostructured Materials, 2018, “Energy harvesting (EH) can be defined as a process wherein the sources such as mechanical load, vibrations, temperature gradients and light, etc., are scavenged and converted to obtain relatively small levels of power in the nW-mW range [1–3].”

Common energy harvesting options include:

  • Solar Cells
  • Radio Frequency Harvesting
  • Vibration Harvesting

While gaining popularity, there are two major challenges to overcome. First, they lack the peak-power capability to transmit data. Second, they are an unreliable (intermittent) energy source.

A Lack of Power

Energy harvesting technologies provide enough power for devices in their sleep state, but too little power to wirelessly transmit data (via bluetooth, Wi-Fi, cellular options) from the edge it is collected from. In other words, the energy harvesting technology might power sensors on the IoT device to collect information, but cannot send that information anywhere useful or impactful.

For example, an IoT device (such as an air quality monitor in a SmartCity application that takes 6 measurements per hour and transmits data one time per hour) might draw:

  • 10mA when in sleep mode (~90% of the time)
  • 200mA when collecting data (~10% of the time)
  • 1500mA when transmitting data (<1% of the time)

Even in an ideal environment, energy harvesting technologies lack the peak power capability required when transmitting data. For <1% of the time, something 150x more powerful is needed. As new features and capabilities are added to IoT devices, and as they are deployed in more extreme/remote locations, more power will be needed.

Intermittent Power

In addition to lacking enough power for data transmission, energy harvesting technologies are also notoriously intermittent and dependent on environmental factors.

For example, a solar cell might generate 150mW in full direct sunlight, but only 50mW in a shadow (66% less). A vibration energy harvesting device might generate 35mW at 50Hz, but less than 5mW at a frequencies less than 48Hz or greater than 52Hz.

This forces designers and engineers to reconcile an engineering tradeoff. They can choose to either starve their load of power when no energy is being harvested (like a solar cell in the dark), or they can add an energy storage to their product (which they were trying to avoid by using an energy harvesting technology).

An Integrated Supercapacitor Solution?

Capacitech produces a flexible, wire-like supercapacitor that is designed to complement energy sources (such as energy harvesting modules and batteries) by providing peak power assistance and miniaturized electronics by leveraging its form factor.

Cable Based Capacitor.png

While energy harvesting technologies are gaining popularity, they require an energy storage device to overcome their lack of power and intermit nature. While batteries can be used, their short cycle (or service) life is less than ideal given the cost to replace batteries. Supercapacitors have become increasingly attractive solutions as they can provide more than enough power for data transmission and have very cycle life. Supercapacitors face the challenge of being restricted to use on printed circuit boards, where space is limited.

Capacitech’s flexible supercapacitor, the Cable-Based Capacitor (CBC) , has space saving advantages over traditional supercapacitor technologies. It can be routed around printed circuit boards in a way to use little to no real estate (surface area) on the circuit, or can be used off-board and inside the infrastructure of the product or system.

About the CBC.

The Cable-Based Capacitor (CBC) is a flexible supercapacitor (energy storage device) featuring over 3F of capacitance. It is designed to be used where no supercapacitor has gone before, off the printed circuit board (PCB) and integrated into other parts of a product or system, such as inside a wiring harness, where it can charge and discharge its power or energy very quickly.

Why is it unique?

The CBC is unique because of its flexible and wire-like form factor. While traditional supercapacitors are rigid and restricted to use on a PCB, the CBC is leveraging its flexible and wire-like form factor to build a discrete and distributed network of energy storage throughout the world’s infrastructure; inside of wiring harnesses, power cords, shoes and other wearables, electronics enclosures, etc… The CBC also takes up less surface area on circuit boards than traditional supercapacitors too.

Where can it be used?

The CBC is best in energy storage applications where there is a size, space, or aesthetic constraint on the product or system.

See Capacitech web site for more details and the video demonstration of an application example. The CBC is now also available at Mouser Electronics here.

Related

Source: Capacitech

Recent Posts

Samsung Introduced Low ESL 3-Terminal Reverse-Geometry MLCCs for High-Performance ADAS

20.5.2026
21

Using Stress–Strain Curves to Diagnose Tantalum Powders for Capacitors

20.5.2026
19

Samsung Launches Ultra-Compact 008004 High Q MLCC for Next-Generation RF Applications

20.5.2026
16

Nichicon Extends Rechargeable Batteries Temperature to Rival Supercapacitors

19.5.2026
24

Two‑capacitor paradox explained for engineers

18.5.2026
49

ESA SPCD 26 Registration Open

15.5.2026
26

Capacitances of Nonlinear MLCCs: What Datasheets Don’t Tell You

14.5.2026
89

How a Digital Structural Twin Can Predict Tantalum Capacitor Reliability

14.5.2026
68

Researchers Propose Next‑Gen Compact Memory Using Ultra-thin Ferroelectric Capacitors

11.5.2026
52

Upcoming Events

Jun 2
16:00 - 17:00 CEST

Calculation, Simulation and Measurement of 800V EMC Filters

Jun 16
16:00 - 17:00 CEST

EMC with EMC – EMC‑compliant design with electromechanical connectors

View Calendar

Popular Posts

  • Buck Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Boost Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Flyback Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • LLC Resonant Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • MLCC and Ceramic Capacitors

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Capacitor Charging and Discharging

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • What Electronics Engineer Needs to Know About Passive Low Pass Filters

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Dual Active Bridge (DAB) Topology

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Ripple Current and its Effects on the Performance of Capacitors

    3 shares
    Share 3 Tweet 0
  • Samsung Electro-Mechanics Releases High-Capacitance MLCCs for AI Server Applications

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Newsletter Subscription

 

Passive Components Blog

© EPCI - Leading Passive Components Educational and Information Site

  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • EPCI Membership & Advertisement
  • About

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Knowledge Blog
  • PCNS

© EPCI - Leading Passive Components Educational and Information Site

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.
Go to mobile version