Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Optoelectronics and Isolation
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest
    Power line EMI filter on a copper ground-plane fixture connected to a vector network analyzer with a toroidal balun

    How to Measure Filter Performance: Insertion Loss, VNA Fixtures and CM/DM Separation

    Assorted EMI and RF filter components: common mode choke, ferrite beads, feedthrough filter, X2 capacitor, cavity filter, ceramic coaxial resonators, thin-film filter and SAW/BAW packages

    Passive Filter Technologies Compared: LC, Ferrite, Feedthrough, Ceramic, Cavity, Microstrip, SAW and BAW

    Illustration of a thin-film capacitor stack with TiN electrodes and an ultrathin hafnium zirconium oxide ferroelectric layer on silicon

    Sub-Volt Ferroelectric HZO Capacitor Pairs Speed and Endurance

    Cut-open lithium-ion capacitor pouch cell showing stacked carbon electrodes and separators, with vials of carbon powder

    Lithium-Ion Capacitor Review Backs Hard Carbon//AC Pairing

    Rack power shelf in an AI data center with film DC-link capacitors, a supercapacitor bank and a converter board

    800 VDC AI Data Centers Reshape Capacitor Demand for 2027

    Schematic of a titanium nitride thin-film inductor within a CMOS poly-resistor stack beside its integrated resonator circuit.

    TiN Superinductors Bring Compact Cryogenic Inductance to CMOS

    Close-up of reddish-brown metallic rocks illustrating TTI MarketEYE’s connector raw material cost analysis

    Connector Raw Material Costs Rise 20.9% in Q2 2026

    AI and Passive Components: Structural Growth Beyond Data Centers

    YAGEO PMT6397 push-pull transformer with a segmented toroidal winding and surface-mount terminals

    YAGEO Releases Push-Pull Transformers for Isolated 3 W Supplies

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • Knowledge Blog
  • Dossiers
    • Aerospace and Defense Passive Components Dossier
    • AI Hardware Dossier
    • Automotive Dossier
    • Industrial Robotics Dossier
    • Power Converter Dossier
    • Capacitor Dossier
    • Circuit Protection Dossier
    • Inductor Dossier
    • Resistor Dossier
    • Silicon Capacitors and Integrated Passives Dossier
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • PCNS
    • PCNS 2025
    • PCNS 2023
    • PCNS 2021
    • PCNS 2019
    • PCNS 2017
  • Events
  • Home
  • News
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Optoelectronics and Isolation
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest
    Power line EMI filter on a copper ground-plane fixture connected to a vector network analyzer with a toroidal balun

    How to Measure Filter Performance: Insertion Loss, VNA Fixtures and CM/DM Separation

    Assorted EMI and RF filter components: common mode choke, ferrite beads, feedthrough filter, X2 capacitor, cavity filter, ceramic coaxial resonators, thin-film filter and SAW/BAW packages

    Passive Filter Technologies Compared: LC, Ferrite, Feedthrough, Ceramic, Cavity, Microstrip, SAW and BAW

    Illustration of a thin-film capacitor stack with TiN electrodes and an ultrathin hafnium zirconium oxide ferroelectric layer on silicon

    Sub-Volt Ferroelectric HZO Capacitor Pairs Speed and Endurance

    Cut-open lithium-ion capacitor pouch cell showing stacked carbon electrodes and separators, with vials of carbon powder

    Lithium-Ion Capacitor Review Backs Hard Carbon//AC Pairing

    Rack power shelf in an AI data center with film DC-link capacitors, a supercapacitor bank and a converter board

    800 VDC AI Data Centers Reshape Capacitor Demand for 2027

    Schematic of a titanium nitride thin-film inductor within a CMOS poly-resistor stack beside its integrated resonator circuit.

    TiN Superinductors Bring Compact Cryogenic Inductance to CMOS

    Close-up of reddish-brown metallic rocks illustrating TTI MarketEYE’s connector raw material cost analysis

    Connector Raw Material Costs Rise 20.9% in Q2 2026

    AI and Passive Components: Structural Growth Beyond Data Centers

    YAGEO PMT6397 push-pull transformer with a segmented toroidal winding and surface-mount terminals

    YAGEO Releases Push-Pull Transformers for Isolated 3 W Supplies

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • Knowledge Blog
  • Dossiers
    • Aerospace and Defense Passive Components Dossier
    • AI Hardware Dossier
    • Automotive Dossier
    • Industrial Robotics Dossier
    • Power Converter Dossier
    • Capacitor Dossier
    • Circuit Protection Dossier
    • Inductor Dossier
    • Resistor Dossier
    • Silicon Capacitors and Integrated Passives Dossier
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • PCNS
    • PCNS 2025
    • PCNS 2023
    • PCNS 2021
    • PCNS 2019
    • PCNS 2017
  • Events
No Result
View All Result
Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result

How to Optimize a Magnetic Design by Adjusting Core and Windings Parameters

10.10.2023
Reading Time: 6 mins read
A A

Pablo Blázquez, Power Εlectronics Εngineer of Frenetic in this blog discuss how to balance a Magnetic design by adjusting certain parameters in the core and windings.

One of the key challenges in Magnetic design is to achieve a balance between different performance parameters such as power efficiency, magnetic flux density, and operating frequency. This is particularly important in those applications where the device is expected to operate under different load conditions or in a range of environments.

RelatedPosts

Transformer Losses and Thermal Design: Modelling and Validation

5 kW 800 V-to-50 V PSFB Transformer Design for Data Centers

Designing a USB Type‑C Flyback Planar Transformer with Frenetic’s Planar Tool

In this edition, we will explore some of the techniques and principles involved in the balancing of a Magnetic design. We will focus on the role of both the core and the windings in achieving optimal performance, and we will discuss how modifications to these parameters can affect the overall magnetic properties of the device.

Whether you are an engineer, a researcher, or someone with an interest in Electronics, I hope that this post will provide you with valuable insights and ideas for improving the performance of your Magnetic designs.

Balance, Why?

Let’s start with a simple question: why do we want the losses to be perfectly distributed between core and windings in our Magnetic? In a magnetic component, such as a Transformer or an Inductor, energy losses can occur in both the core and the windings. The losses in the core are primarily due to hysteresis and eddy currents, while those in the windings are due to the resistance of the wire.

Ideally, we want the losses to be evenly distributed between the core and the windings, because this can improve the overall efficiency and reliability of the magnetic itself. If the losses are concentrated primarily in one area, for example in the core, it can lead to increased heating and temperature rise, which can therefore degrade the performance of the component and reduce its lifespan.

By distributing the losses evenly between the core and the windings, we can ensure that the heat generated is dissipated in a more uniform way, reducing the risk of hot spots and thermal stress. Additionally, a more balanced distribution of losses can also help to reduce the overall size and weight of the component, making it more cost-effective and easier to integrate into a wide range of applications.

In summary, distributing the losses evenly between the core and the windings is key to the optimization of the efficiency, reliability, and performance of our magnetic components.

How you can do that?

There are several ways to balance losses between the core and the windings in our Magnetic. Let’s analyze them starting from a design that you can access here:

1. Choose the right core material

The choice of core material can have a significant impact on the distribution of losses. For example, using a core material with lower hysteresis losses can help you to reduce losses in the core. In Figure 1 you can see a comparison between the original design and two slightly different versions:

Figure 1. 3C97 VS 3C90 VS KoolMu 60 magnetic core material comparison

The first on the left is the original design. In the second version we have changed the original core material (Ferrite 3C97) to 3C90, while in the third one we have switched to powder material KoolMu 60. It is clearly visible that the core losses increase in both cases and, although the powder material provides more balance, it results in considerably higher losses.

2. Adjust the core size

The size of the core can also affect the distribution of losses: by Increasing the core size, you can reduce the magnetic flux density and decrease core losses. Figure 2 shows the result of increasing the core size compared to the original design.

Figure 2. PQ35 VS PQ40 VS E41 magnetic core material comparison

You can see how, in both examples, we have slightly increased the core losses. However, reducing the core temperature in the PQ 40 seems to have affected the overall temperature and this can be one of the reasons why the overall losses have decreased.

In the second example, the E41, we get the opposite result. The less efficient E core has raised the core losses and temperature, causing an increase in the winding losses and therefore a growth in the overall losses.

3. Change the number of turns

The number of turns in a magnetic component also affects the distribution of losses. Decreasing the number of turns can help you shift the winding losses to the core. In Figure 3 you can see the effect of changing the number of turns in the overall design: 

Table 1. Nº of turns effect to magnetic design
Figure 3. Losses Evolution with Nº of turns in magnetic design

4. Optimize the wire size

Using the right wire size can reduce the overall losses in the windings.

Figure 4. Different Wires impact comparison

In Figure 4 you can see a comparison between several wires with different sizes and types. We have the litz wires on the top, and the round wires in the bottom. In terms of losses, you can clearly see that litz wire has much lower losses than the round ones. Moreover, in both examples the size incrementation of the wire reduces the overall losses.

5. Adjust the operating frequency

The operating frequency of a magnetic component can also impact the losses distribution. Operating at a lower frequency can help you reduce core losses, while operating at a higher frequency can help you reduce winding losses. You can read more on this topic in post here: Optimal Frequency for a PSFB.

Conclusions

In practice, achieving a perfectly balanced distribution of losses may not always be possible. However, by using a combination of the techniques explained today, it is possible to optimize the design of a magnetic component for a given application and therefore achieve a more balanced losses distribution.

It is completely up to you which options to choose, if not all of them work for you. Just bear in mind that you’re not always going to be able to have a balanced design that meets your requirements, and you might have to make the decision whether to have fewer losses or a balanced design

Related

Source: Frenetic

Recent Posts

Power line EMI filter on a copper ground-plane fixture connected to a vector network analyzer with a toroidal balun

How to Measure Filter Performance: Insertion Loss, VNA Fixtures and CM/DM Separation

6.11.2026
3
Assorted EMI and RF filter components: common mode choke, ferrite beads, feedthrough filter, X2 capacitor, cavity filter, ceramic coaxial resonators, thin-film filter and SAW/BAW packages

Passive Filter Technologies Compared: LC, Ferrite, Feedthrough, Ceramic, Cavity, Microstrip, SAW and BAW

6.11.2026
8
Schematic of a titanium nitride thin-film inductor within a CMOS poly-resistor stack beside its integrated resonator circuit.

TiN Superinductors Bring Compact Cryogenic Inductance to CMOS

5.11.2026
14
YAGEO PMT6397 push-pull transformer with a segmented toroidal winding and surface-mount terminals

YAGEO Releases Push-Pull Transformers for Isolated 3 W Supplies

5.11.2026
8

Transformer Losses and Thermal Design: Modelling and Validation

4.11.2026
20
Würth Elektronik WE-SLSP SMT common-mode choke with a square package and four terminals.

Würth Elektronik Releases Common-Mode Chokes for 100 V Data and Power Lines

4.11.2026
20

AI Server Power Supply Efficiency Under Pulsed Loads

4.11.2026
11
Schematic diagrams illustrating the physical model of the stripline microinductor.

Stripline Microinductors with Nickel–Iron Oxide Cores

4.11.2026
9
Würth Elektronik WE-LHMI and WE-HCI power inductor comparison slide showing current ratings and maximum operating temperatures

Power Inductor Selection: Ferrite vs Powder Core Trade-Offs, Würth Elektronik Webinar

3.11.2026
34

Upcoming Events

Nov 24
16:00 - 17:00 CET

Select the Correct Components for Your DC/DC Converter

Dec 1
16:00 - 17:00 CET

Developing low-noise mixed-signal systems

Dec 8
16:00 - 17:00 CET

WE-CCMF: Design Principles, Layout Guidelines and Measurement Results for High-Speed EMI Filtering

View Calendar

Popular Posts

  • Buck Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • September 2026 Interconnect, Passives and Electromechanical Components Market Insights

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Boost Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Capacitor Charging and Discharging

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • LLC Resonant Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • RF Connector Types: How To Choose the Right One

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Flyback Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Passive Low Pass Filters: Fundamentals and EMI Design

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Audio Capacitors: Choosing Capacitors for Crossover Circuits

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • MLCC and Ceramic Capacitors

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Newsletter Subscription

 

Passive Components Blog

© 2015–2026
All rights reserved

  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • EPCI Membership & Advertisement
  • About

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Knowledge Blog
  • Dossiers
  • PCNS

© 2015–2026
All rights reserved