Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • NewsFilter
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest

    Binder Hybrid Connector Simplifies One Cable Automation

    Tapped Inductor Buck Converter Fundamentals

    TAIYO YUDEN Releases Mini Metal Power Inductors

    Molecular Memristor Shows Record 145 kH Emergent Inductance

    Planar vs Conventional Transformer: When it Make Sense

    Researchers Propose Next‑Gen Compact Memory Using Ultra-thin Ferroelectric Capacitors

    Nichicon ADN Automotive Hybrid Aluminum Capacitors Now Available in EMEA

    Wk 19 Electronics Supply Chain Digest

    Electrocaloric Multilayer Capacitors: Towards Quiet, Solid‑State Cooling Around Room Temperature

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • VideoFilter
    • All
    • Antenna videos
    • Capacitor videos
    • Circuit Protection Video
    • Filter videos
    • Fuse videos
    • Inductor videos
    • Inter-Connect Video
    • Non-linear passives videos
    • Oscillator videos
    • Passive sensors videos
    • Resistor videos

    Tapped Inductor Buck Converter Fundamentals

    Planar vs Conventional Transformer: When it Make Sense

    Modeling Fringing Field Losses in Inductors & Transformers

    Why Power Inductors Use a Ferrite Core With an Air Gap

    Transformer-Based Power-Line Harvester Magnetic Design

    Thermal Modeling of Magnetics

    Standard vs Planar LLC transformers Comparison for Battery Chargers

    How Modern Tools Model Magnetic Components for Power Electronics

    Advanced Loss Modeling for Planar Magnetics in the Frenetic Planar Tool

    Trending Tags

    • Capacitors explained
    • Inductors explained
    • Resistors explained
    • Filters explained
    • Application Video Guidelines
    • EMC
    • New Products
    • Ripple Current
    • Simulation
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
  • Knowledge Blog
  • DossiersNew
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • PCNS
    • PCNS 2025
    • PCNS 2023
    • PCNS 2021
    • PCNS 2019
    • PCNS 2017
  • Events
  • Home
  • NewsFilter
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest

    Binder Hybrid Connector Simplifies One Cable Automation

    Tapped Inductor Buck Converter Fundamentals

    TAIYO YUDEN Releases Mini Metal Power Inductors

    Molecular Memristor Shows Record 145 kH Emergent Inductance

    Planar vs Conventional Transformer: When it Make Sense

    Researchers Propose Next‑Gen Compact Memory Using Ultra-thin Ferroelectric Capacitors

    Nichicon ADN Automotive Hybrid Aluminum Capacitors Now Available in EMEA

    Wk 19 Electronics Supply Chain Digest

    Electrocaloric Multilayer Capacitors: Towards Quiet, Solid‑State Cooling Around Room Temperature

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • VideoFilter
    • All
    • Antenna videos
    • Capacitor videos
    • Circuit Protection Video
    • Filter videos
    • Fuse videos
    • Inductor videos
    • Inter-Connect Video
    • Non-linear passives videos
    • Oscillator videos
    • Passive sensors videos
    • Resistor videos

    Tapped Inductor Buck Converter Fundamentals

    Planar vs Conventional Transformer: When it Make Sense

    Modeling Fringing Field Losses in Inductors & Transformers

    Why Power Inductors Use a Ferrite Core With an Air Gap

    Transformer-Based Power-Line Harvester Magnetic Design

    Thermal Modeling of Magnetics

    Standard vs Planar LLC transformers Comparison for Battery Chargers

    How Modern Tools Model Magnetic Components for Power Electronics

    Advanced Loss Modeling for Planar Magnetics in the Frenetic Planar Tool

    Trending Tags

    • Capacitors explained
    • Inductors explained
    • Resistors explained
    • Filters explained
    • Application Video Guidelines
    • EMC
    • New Products
    • Ripple Current
    • Simulation
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
  • Knowledge Blog
  • DossiersNew
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • PCNS
    • PCNS 2025
    • PCNS 2023
    • PCNS 2021
    • PCNS 2019
    • PCNS 2017
  • Events
No Result
View All Result
Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result

Impact of Thermal Crosstalk on Dependent MLCC Failures

16.1.2025
Reading Time: 7 mins read
A A

Researchers from PennState, USA published scientific paper entitled “Impact of thermal crosstalk on dependent failure rates of multilayer ceramic capacitors undergoing lifetime testing” in Journal of Applied Physics.

The study investigates the impact of thermal crosstalk on the failure rates of multilayer ceramic capacitors (MLCCs) during lifetime testing.

RelatedPosts

Binder Hybrid Connector Simplifies One Cable Automation

Tapped Inductor Buck Converter Fundamentals

TAIYO YUDEN Releases Mini Metal Power Inductors

The research focuses on the degradation of BaTiO3-based dielectric capacitor materials and how thermal crosstalk influences dependent and independent failure rates.

Using finite element analysis thermal modeling and infrared thermography, the study examines the effects of circuit layout and component spacing on heat dissipation and thermal crosstalk under various electrical stress conditions.

Key findings include:

  • Thermal crosstalk significantly affects the failure rates of MLCCs, with closer spacing between components leading to higher failure rates.
  • The β′ factor is used to quantify the impact of common cause failures due to thermal crosstalk.
  • Experimental and statistical analyses show that reducing thermal crosstalk can improve the reliability of MLCCs.
  • The study highlights the importance of optimizing circuit layout design to mitigate dependent failures and enhance overall reliability.

The research provides valuable insights into the relationship between MLCC failure testing and operational lifetime implications, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of thermal management in high-density electronic circuits.

Abstract

Several studies have examined the degradation of BaTiO3-based dielectric capacitors, focusing on composition, defect chemistry, and microstructural design to limit oxygen vacancy electromigration under electric fields at finite temperatures. Electromigration is a key factor in determining capacitor failure rates in multilayer ceramic capacitors (MLCCs) during highly accelerated lifetime testing (HALT), which assesses the mean time to failure (MTTF) of MLCCs on printed circuit boards (PCBs). Traditionally, these failures are seen as independent, with no component interaction on the PCB.

Introduction

This study uses a Physics of Failure (PoF) approach to analyze transient degradation and its effect on MLCC reliability, particularly thermal crosstalk. Finite element analysis and infrared thermography were employed to evaluate circuit layout and component spacing on heat dissipation and thermal crosstalk under various electrical stresses. The study identifies dependent and independent failures under HALT using a β′ factor, which indicates common cause failures due to thermal crosstalk.

Experimental and statistical analyses evaluated the β′ factor concerning temperature, voltage, and component spacing. These findings underscore the need to understand reliability testing data and optimize high-density circuit layouts to reduce dependent failures, enhancing overall reliability and guiding better design and packaging strategies.

As electronics evolve toward higher density and power, miniaturization in hybrid circuits is achieved by reducing component size and spacing. This trend challenges device reliability and thermal management. The work focuses on base metal electrode (BME) MLCCs, the most common passive components in modern electronics. The number of MLCCs is increasing to meet circuit capacitive demands. Among MLCC failure mechanisms under electrical bias, time-dependent degradation is particularly interesting and requires further understanding to mitigate risks.

MLCCs perform various functions in electronic circuits, such as charge storage, DC blocking, noise and frequency filtering, and circuit tuning. Under DC or AC bias with ripples, MLCCs experience time-dependent degradation due to oxygen vacancy electromigration, reducing insulation resistance. Mitigation strategies include compositional development, grain size reduction, microstructural development like core–shell structures, and electrode roughness reduction in BaTiO3-based MLCCs. These developments tailor dielectric temperature dependence while limiting oxygen vacancy concentrations and mobilities. Materials in MLCCs must be designed to restrict oxygen vacancy electromigration.

Recent reliability analysis advancements emphasize the PoF approach, moving beyond traditional empirical models. PoF explores how external stressors, like heat, affect components and their collective impact on system reliability, providing a comprehensive understanding of component behavior and failure dynamics. When assessing MLCC reliability, HALT is crucial in determining voltage and temperature ratings under long-term conditions. Understanding failure nature and probability under HALT is essential. Reliability data from HALT samples must represent a larger production batch. Under accelerated conditions of higher voltage and temperatures, predictions about MLCC component lifetime under operating conditions are necessary. Typically, data are analyzed from MTTF under specific voltage and temperature conditions. Two approaches are used to extrapolate MTTF under various conditions: the Eyring Equation and Tipping point model. Under HALT conditions, MLCC components must be mounted in fixtures or PCBs to ensure independent failures and help identify a single root cause of failure with well-processed samples. Ideally, independent failure events occur across multiple MLCC components without affecting neighboring ones in the HALT.

Results and Discussion

The HALT results highlighted in Fig.1. below demonstrate the impact of different PCB designs on failure distribution. Decreasing the spacing between MLCCs shortens their lifetime. This impact is quantified by analyzing the α and β values of the Weibull distribution for the MLCCs failure time distribution and summarized in Table I. A reduction in the α value, along with an increase in the β value, was observed for MLCCs mounted on the N-PCB compared to those on the M-PCB. These data indicate that the MLCCs mounted closer together tend to have a shorter MTTF. These findings suggest that thermal crosstalk among mounted MLCCs serves as a catalyst for their failures. Thermal analysis was performed to further explain the observed trend.

Fig.1. Weibull and probability density function (inset) plots of MLCCs mounted on the N-, M-, W-, and four-layer W-PCBs under an ambient temperature condition of 150 °C and a DC applied voltage of 275 V.
PCBsα (min)β1000λ
Narrow spacing (N) 2700 ± 100 6.0 ± 0.8 0.37 ± 0.01 
Moderate spacing (M) 3100 ± 200 3.8 ± 0.6 0.32 ± 0.02 
Wide spacing (W) 3700 ± 100 6.1 ± 0.9 0.27 ± 0.01 
Wide spacing (four-layer) 4100 ± 200 5.1 ± 0.8 0.24 ± 0.01 
Tab I. Weibull distribution parameters and failure rate (λ) of the MLCCs mounted on the N-, M-, W-, and four-layer W-PCB under an ambient temperature of 150 °C and a DC voltage of 275 V.

Summary and Conclusions

The critical role of component spacing in managing thermal crosstalk becomes evident as a population of MLCC components undergo degradation. As individual components start to heat through a Joule heating process, they can perturb the degradation rate of neighboring components on the circuit board. Through FEA thermal modeling, IR thermography, HALT, and a statistical analysis of dependent and independent failure rates, these studies evaluate the impact of spacing, voltage, and ambient temperature on different circuit boards.

MLCC component spacing significantly affects thermal interactions, with closer spacings, like those observed on the N-PCB, leading to more pronounced thermal crosstalk. This underscores the need for strategic spatial separation and thermal management in circuit design to ensure component integrity in densely packed circuits and emphasizes the necessity of accounting for both dependent and independent failures in HALT to comprehensively understand MLCC failure dynamics.

The statistical β′ factor analyses conducted in this study revealed correlations between β′, temperature, voltage, and component spacing. The minimal sensitivity of β′ to the ambient temperature in the testing range of 145–155 °C was supported by thermal modeling. However, the linear relationships of β′ with voltage and spacing are found. The weakest components in the first quartile of the lifetime distribution become sources of the thermal crosstalk, driving up the failure rate.

The extent of this effect depends on the operating voltage and the component spacings in each circuit board design. Therefore, understanding and quantifying the failure-dependent factor are crucial for correlating independent failure distributions observed during HALT. The critical findings highlight the importance of strategic circuit design and packaging to more effectively mitigate dependent failures in similar components, such as capacitor arrays. As the electronics industry continues to push toward smaller and more densely packed circuits, the findings from this study highlight the increasing importance of employing standardized methods for failure analysis and advanced physical models for circuit design.

Read the full article here:

Pedram Yousefian, Daniel C. Shoemaker, Javier Mena-Garcia, Michael Norrell, Jeff Long, Sukwon Choi, Clive A. Randall; Impact of thermal crosstalk on dependent failure rates of multilayer ceramic capacitors undergoing lifetime testing. J. Appl. Phys. 21 January 2025; 137 (3): 034104. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0245201

Related

Source: Journal of Applied Physics

Recent Posts

Tapped Inductor Buck Converter Fundamentals

13.5.2026
11

Molecular Memristor Shows Record 145 kH Emergent Inductance

12.5.2026
11

Planar vs Conventional Transformer: When it Make Sense

11.5.2026
35

Researchers Propose Next‑Gen Compact Memory Using Ultra-thin Ferroelectric Capacitors

11.5.2026
28

Nichicon ADN Automotive Hybrid Aluminum Capacitors Now Available in EMEA

11.5.2026
23

Electrocaloric Multilayer Capacitors: Towards Quiet, Solid‑State Cooling Around Room Temperature

7.5.2026
186

KYOCERA 10 µF 0201 MLCC Brings High‑Capacitance into Mobile Designs

6.5.2026
54

Energy Localization in Tantalum Anode Formation: A Structural Perspective

4.5.2026
46

YAGEO Introduces C0G Flexible Termination Automotive MLCCs

30.4.2026
41

Upcoming Events

May 19
16:00 - 17:00 CEST

Designing Qi2 Wireless Power Systems: Practical Development and EMC Optimization

Jun 2
16:00 - 17:00 CEST

Calculation, Simulation and Measurement of 800V EMC Filters

Jun 16
16:00 - 17:00 CEST

EMC with EMC – EMC‑compliant design with electromechanical connectors

View Calendar

Popular Posts

  • Buck Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Boost Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Flyback Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • LLC Resonant Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • MLCC and Ceramic Capacitors

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Dual Active Bridge (DAB) Topology

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Capacitor Charging and Discharging

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • What Electronics Engineer Needs to Know About Passive Low Pass Filters

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Ripple Current and its Effects on the Performance of Capacitors

    3 shares
    Share 3 Tweet 0
  • MLCC Case Sizes Standards Explained

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Newsletter Subscription

 

Passive Components Blog

© EPCI - Leading Passive Components Educational and Information Site

  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • EPCI Membership & Advertisement
  • About

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Knowledge Blog
  • PCNS

© EPCI - Leading Passive Components Educational and Information Site

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.
Go to mobile version