Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • NewsFilter
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest

    5th PCNS Conference Registration Now Open!

    YAGEO Introduces Automotive Supercapacitors for Stable BMS in EVs

    Capacitance Definition of Non-Linear Voltage Dependent Capacitors

    Littelfuse Releases Harsh Environment Robust Tactile Switches

    Bourns Releases Noise Suppression Common Mode SMD Inductors

    Passive Electronic Components Lead-times Update

    Bourns Releases New SMD Line Filter for Enhanced EMI Suppression

    TDK Expands 3-terminal Automotive SMD Chip Filters to 35V

    Quantic Eulex Presents Ceramic Gap RF Capacitors

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • VideoFilter
    • All
    • Antenna videos
    • Capacitor videos
    • Circuit Protection Video
    • Filter videos
    • Fuse videos
    • Inductor videos
    • Inter-Connect Video
    • Non-linear passives videos
    • Oscillator videos
    • Passive sensors videos
    • Resistor videos

    Coupled Inductors Circuit Model and Examples of its Applications

    Inductor Resonances and its Impact to EMI

    Highly Reliable Flex Rigid PCBs, Würth Elektronik Webinar

    Causes of Oscillations in Flyback Converters

    How to design a 60W Flyback Transformer

    Modeling and Simulation of Leakage Inductance

    Power Inductor Considerations for AI High Power Computing – Vishay Video

    Coupled Inductors in Multiphase Boost Converters

    VPG Demonstrates Precision Resistor in Cryogenic Conditions

    Trending Tags

    • Capacitors explained
    • Inductors explained
    • Resistors explained
    • Filters explained
    • Application Video Guidelines
    • EMC
    • New Products
    • Ripple Current
    • Simulation
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
  • Knowledge Blog
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • Events
  • Home
  • NewsFilter
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest

    5th PCNS Conference Registration Now Open!

    YAGEO Introduces Automotive Supercapacitors for Stable BMS in EVs

    Capacitance Definition of Non-Linear Voltage Dependent Capacitors

    Littelfuse Releases Harsh Environment Robust Tactile Switches

    Bourns Releases Noise Suppression Common Mode SMD Inductors

    Passive Electronic Components Lead-times Update

    Bourns Releases New SMD Line Filter for Enhanced EMI Suppression

    TDK Expands 3-terminal Automotive SMD Chip Filters to 35V

    Quantic Eulex Presents Ceramic Gap RF Capacitors

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • VideoFilter
    • All
    • Antenna videos
    • Capacitor videos
    • Circuit Protection Video
    • Filter videos
    • Fuse videos
    • Inductor videos
    • Inter-Connect Video
    • Non-linear passives videos
    • Oscillator videos
    • Passive sensors videos
    • Resistor videos

    Coupled Inductors Circuit Model and Examples of its Applications

    Inductor Resonances and its Impact to EMI

    Highly Reliable Flex Rigid PCBs, Würth Elektronik Webinar

    Causes of Oscillations in Flyback Converters

    How to design a 60W Flyback Transformer

    Modeling and Simulation of Leakage Inductance

    Power Inductor Considerations for AI High Power Computing – Vishay Video

    Coupled Inductors in Multiphase Boost Converters

    VPG Demonstrates Precision Resistor in Cryogenic Conditions

    Trending Tags

    • Capacitors explained
    • Inductors explained
    • Resistors explained
    • Filters explained
    • Application Video Guidelines
    • EMC
    • New Products
    • Ripple Current
    • Simulation
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
  • Knowledge Blog
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • Events
No Result
View All Result
Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result

Optimization of 500W LLC Transformer – Case Study

10.10.2023
Reading Time: 8 mins read
A A

In this article Frenetic power electronics engineer Sotiris Zorbas, MSc try to identify the weak spot of 500W LLC Transformer design nad propose new construction design as a case study of transformer design optimization.

Referring to Texas Instruments application note for a 500W LLC Half bridge (PMP40379)1 power supply I started off searching through the app note to see if I could find some info about the magnetic components.

RelatedPosts

How to design a 60W Flyback Transformer

How to Design LLC Transformer

Leakage Inductance Model; Frenetic Webinar Recording

Without having a clear image about the transformer materials or the exact construction, I tried to simulate a compatible transformer to get similar results and see if we can improve the design further.

In Table 1 you can have a look at the most relevant specs for the construction of the transformer:

Table 1. Relevant specification of 500W LLC transformer

Transformer Thermal Simulation

Figure 1 shows the Frenetic simulation and an actual thermal picture of the transformer for the same operating conditions.

Figure 1. Performance of the simulated transformer VS app note thermal image

We predict that the maximum hotspot temperature is in the center leg of the transformer at 94°C (we can’t see that in the image). The windings temperature is predicted at 88°C, while they appear to be at 94-99°C and the core surface temperature is really close to the actual one, around 78-80°C.

DISCLAIMER: The exact Litz wire dimensions and winding arrangements were unknown from the online material, so any differences in temperature can be easily explained in this case. Despite this fact, the overall temperature behavior of this design is in line with the actual transformer behavior.

The main idea of this simulation was to get as close as possible to the actual transformer built for the Texas Instruments app note, and not to optimize it! What I needed was a starting point to make iterations later.

Transformer Design Improvements

In the next step, I will focus on the weak points of this transformer, trying to improve the design and to realize a more efficient component!

Now the question is, where is the design’s weak spot? And by weak spot I mean looking at the temperature at different places on the Transformer. Focusing on the Transformer thermal image under test, we can easily notice a ~20°C difference between the temperature of the windings and the one of the core. In the simulation, which again isn’t an exact one because of the lack of data, we can come up with an observation about the hotspot location at the center leg of the Transformer.

The core losses elevate the core temperature. The skin, proximity and fringing losses elevate the temperature at the windings. But the windings and the core conduct heat between them because they are thermally coupled with the bobbin as a medium.

That said, the weak spot of many Transformer designs is usually located in the center leg. That’s the area where we don’t have any air convection, plus the fact the center leg is in contact with the bobbin, which can easily make the temperature rise even more.

Therefore, the hypothesis is that the weak spot here is the temperature of the center leg. That is not obvious in the thermal image, but it is clear in the simulation graph on the right. That might be true, but unfortunately there isn’t a way to just lower the temperature of the Transformer’s center leg.

What can we do?

  • Plan A: Decrease the core losses.
  • Plan B: Decrease the winding losses.
  • Plan C: Decrease both the core and the winding losses.
  • Plan D: Change the ratio of losses closer to 50-50, keeping the total losses (core + winding) approximately the same.
  • Plan E: Change the ratio of losses closer to 50-50 and decrease the total losses.

Out of the five options, Plan E is definitely the best one, and I’ve decided this will be my approach in this case: lowering the core and the winding losses, whilst trying to keep a 50-50 balance. Seeking to list the other plans by effectiveness is debatable, and it depends on the design.

The game of conflicts

Let’s focus on the plan now. Plan E’s mission starts with lowering the core losses.

To control the flux density, we must change the number of primary/secondary turns. That means that the wire length used for the Transformer is longer, resulting in more resistance and more losses in the windings.

Figure 2. Increasing the turns affects power losses

I aimed at increasing the number of turns to a point where core losses decrease, but not so much as to cause an abrupt increase in winding losses. How aggressively we increase the turns of the primary (and the secondary to maintain the turns ratio) is going to dictate if the winding losses will increase a lot or not.

We can see in Figure 2 that 57% of the losses are from the core, and 43% of the losses are from the winding. Although the ratio of losses isn’t that bad, the core losses by themselves (in Watts) are significant. That is supported by the fact that the peak flux density swings, which dictates that the core losses are close to 200mT. Literature suggest 100-150mT as a nice operating point. There is no reason why we cannot operate at 200-250mT whatsoever, except the fact that the core losses increase roughly at about the 2.7th power of the flux density swing.

I run the numbers going from 200mT -> 150mT and that would equate to 50-55% less core losses for the same core. But my goal is to go from 24T to 30T at the primary, which is problematic given the bobbin space that I have. Truth is, initially I went for it and changed the windings, only to realize that the space of the bobbin forced me to change the windings altogether. That increased the winding losses more than I was comfortable with, meaning that at the end the total power losses didn’t decrease so much.

Therefore, I picked a slightly bigger core. I was lucky enough that the next standard core didn’t have much bigger dimensions, as shown in Figure 3. What it does have though is 34% higher volume and 22% more effective area (Ae) which is what we are actually interested in.

Figure 3. Old vs New transformer core.
Faradays’ law applied to transformer number of turns

As Faraday’s simply suggests, the number of primary turns for a 22% increased Ae will decrease by 18%. In other words, we need less turns for the same operating ∆Bpk.

OLD vs NEW 500W LLC Transformer Design Performance Comparison

You can find all the Magnetics that we design in our Newsletters in the Frenetic Library section.

To get to the point now I choose 28T for the primary turns, that translates into 137mT of flux density swing. Given the fact that the bobbin space has increased (Figure 3) as well, I’ll give this solution a try. In Figure 4 you can see comparison between the two designs.

Figure 4. Old vs New LLC transformer performance and specs.

Conclusion

What have we achieved here in the new LLC transformer version?

  • Core losses dropped by 1.27W or by 46%.
  • Winding losses stayed the same!
  • Total losses decreased by 26.4%

PLAN E was successfully achieved!

Moreover:

  • Transformer dimensions increased only by WxHxD(mm): 6×3.5×4.8
  • The hotspot temperature dropped to 59°C from 88°C (natural convection)

References

  1. Texas Instruments, September 2018, “500-W, Single Stage LLC Power Supply Reference Design for Audio Amplifier”, PMP40379

Related

Source: Frenetic

Recent Posts

5th PCNS Conference Registration Now Open!

5.6.2025
2

Capacitance Definition of Non-Linear Voltage Dependent Capacitors

5.6.2025
5

Bourns Releases Noise Suppression Common Mode SMD Inductors

4.6.2025
10

Passive Electronic Components Lead-times Update

4.6.2025
23

Coilcraft Unveils 165C High-Temperature Coupled Inductors

3.6.2025
10

Murata Expands its Automotive Common Mode Choke Coils to 150C and High Current Capability

29.5.2025
31

Bourns Releases New Current Transformer

29.5.2025
20

Bourns Releases New Shielded Power Inductors for DDR5

29.5.2025
34

Samsung Electro-Mechanics Releases 165C Automotive 0806 Size Power Inductors

21.5.2025
36

Coupled Inductors Circuit Model and Examples of its Applications

21.5.2025
99

Upcoming Events

Jun 24
17:00 - 18:00 CEST

Ultra-Compact and Efficient Switched-Capacitor Power Converters

View Calendar

Popular Posts

  • Buck Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Boost Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Flyback Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • What is a Dielectric Constant and DF of Plastic Materials?

    4 shares
    Share 4 Tweet 0
  • LLC Resonant Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Ripple Current and its Effects on the Performance of Capacitors

    3 shares
    Share 3 Tweet 0
  • Dual Active Bridge (DAB) Topology Explained

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • SEPIC Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • How to Design an Inductor

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Flying Capacitors Explained

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Newsletter Subscription

 

Passive Components Blog

© EPCI - Leading Passive Components Educational and Information Site

  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • EPCI Membership & Advertisement
  • About

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Knowledge Blog
  • Premium Suppliers

© EPCI - Leading Passive Components Educational and Information Site

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.
Go to mobile version