Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest

    August 2026 Interconnect, Passives and Electromechanical Components Market Insights

    AEM Introduced High-Power Fuses for Compact Automotive and Industrial Overcurrent Protection

    Knowles Cornell Dubilier 105C Flatpack Aluminum Electrolytic Capacitors Target Low-Profile High-Density Power Designs

    Vishay Thin Film Chip Resistors Combine up to 50 GHz Operation with High Power Density

    Samsung Electro-Mechanics Secures KRW 1.0722 Trillion AI Server MLCC Supply Contract

    KYOCERA AVX Adds 0201 C0G RF MLCCs to KGU Ultra-Low-ESR Capacitor Series

    Vishay Extends High-Current Common-Mode Chokes with 30 A EMI Filtering up to 150 °C

    Bourns Copper-Electrode MOV Series Targets High-Energy Line Surge Protection

    Bourns Expands 12 mm SMD Incremental Encoder with Shaft-Length Options for Compact HMI Controls

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • Knowledge Blog
  • Dossiers
    • AI Hardware Dossier
    • Automotive Dossier
    • Industrial Robotics Dossier
    • Power Converter Dossier
    • Capacitor Dossier
    • Resistor Dossier
    • Inductor Dossier
    • Circuit Protection Dossier
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • PCNS
    • PCNS 2025
    • PCNS 2023
    • PCNS 2021
    • PCNS 2019
    • PCNS 2017
  • Events
  • Home
  • News
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest

    August 2026 Interconnect, Passives and Electromechanical Components Market Insights

    AEM Introduced High-Power Fuses for Compact Automotive and Industrial Overcurrent Protection

    Knowles Cornell Dubilier 105C Flatpack Aluminum Electrolytic Capacitors Target Low-Profile High-Density Power Designs

    Vishay Thin Film Chip Resistors Combine up to 50 GHz Operation with High Power Density

    Samsung Electro-Mechanics Secures KRW 1.0722 Trillion AI Server MLCC Supply Contract

    KYOCERA AVX Adds 0201 C0G RF MLCCs to KGU Ultra-Low-ESR Capacitor Series

    Vishay Extends High-Current Common-Mode Chokes with 30 A EMI Filtering up to 150 °C

    Bourns Copper-Electrode MOV Series Targets High-Energy Line Surge Protection

    Bourns Expands 12 mm SMD Incremental Encoder with Shaft-Length Options for Compact HMI Controls

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • Knowledge Blog
  • Dossiers
    • AI Hardware Dossier
    • Automotive Dossier
    • Industrial Robotics Dossier
    • Power Converter Dossier
    • Capacitor Dossier
    • Resistor Dossier
    • Inductor Dossier
    • Circuit Protection Dossier
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • PCNS
    • PCNS 2025
    • PCNS 2023
    • PCNS 2021
    • PCNS 2019
    • PCNS 2017
  • Events
No Result
View All Result
Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result

Primary Fuse Protection Against Overvoltage Events

23.1.2025
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A

Overvoltages occur during events such as switching operations, electrostatic discharges as well as lightning discharges. Be they direct or indirect, they are introduced by galvanic, inductive or capacitive means to electrical lines, with the potential to create devastating effects.

Pulse-shaped load currents are a common circuit occurrence and a typical factor for consideration when designing in primary fuses. Pulses can arise individually (Surge), or recurrently (e.g. timed circuits). With individual pulses, the I²t value of the fuse wire becomes quite important. This is because the higher the i²t value the greater the pulse tolerance; with pulse-shaped continuous currents, the calculation of the rms value is crucial, and generally the displacement of the rated current should be taken into account as a result of a possible increase in aging (diffusion).

RelatedPosts

GDT Gas Discharge Tubes: Surge Protection Fundamentals, Selection, and Design‑in Tips

Thermistor Linearization Challenges

PPTC Resettable Fuses Fundaments and Applications

Basic protection options

Two common circuit protection options are typically used to protect a circuit from overvoltages, a fuse for line protection together with an SPD (Surge Protection Device):

Circuit protection option P1: Fuse at the input of the circuit before the SPD
Circuit protection option P2: Fuse at the input of the circuit behind the SPD.

Comparison of protection options:

P1 represents a clean, good solution for the circuit from a technical standpoint. In particular, when using an appliance inlet with integrated fuse, this provides an elegant solution. However, greater attention has to be given to the selection of the fuse with regard to pulse tolerance, due to the fact that the SPD R1 installed downstream results in a high current load for the fuse. The result is a larger I²t value and a lower loss resistance, which increase the pulse tolerance.

The P2 wiring is more universal. Only small loads arise in the fuse, F2, due to minimal surge pulses caused by the SPD (e.g. varistor) R2 installed upstream. In this case, the designer has much more leeway when selecting the fuse.

Damages to the SPDs R1 and R2 do not necessarily trigger the fuse in either circuit variant.

Recommendation: A combination of SPD with a temperature-controlled fuse is recommended for both circuit variants P1 and P2.

Aging caused by surge pulses

When selecting fuse performance characteristics and size, it should always be kept in mind that the behavior of every fuse is changed as a result of current impulses.

The fuse wire often has a coating, which diffuses increasingly deeper into the base material. This ongoing occurrence produces a new alloy, which in turn leads to in a displacement of the rated current and a continuous weakening of the fuse.

Measurement according to IEC 61000-4-5

The ability of a device to cope with these high-energy pulses is measured according to IEC 61000-4-5 with the pulse form 8/20μs for the short-circuit current and 1.2/50μs for the open-circuit voltage. Further details for testing the pulse tolerance [2].

Setup S1 without SPD / Setup S2 with SPD Setup S1 is a surge of 8/20μs directly to fuse F1. This test achieves the highest load for the fuse through the overvoltage test. Variant S2 is a realistic setup for some applications with an SPD in a row. The combination wave overvoltage generator creates a mixed signal of 1.2/50μs voltage and 8/20μs current pulse. The fuse current values shown in the SCHURTER datasheets are tested with the S1 setup and in Unify Tests with S1 and S2. If the fuses perform properly in the circuit, they must be checked individually. There are no stated tests for fuses behind the SPD – analog to protective circuit P2 – since the overvoltage does not represent a high load for the fuse.

Note: In some of the selected SCHURTER datasheets, the fuses were tested either in the P1 arrangement, without varistor (Setup S1) or the P1 arrangement with varistor (Setup S2).

According to the tests carried out, the above pulse tolerances can be proposed in accordance with the classification into the various standard classes. The characteristic values for the respective products are listed depending on the rated current.

Test comparison according to current standards

Test comparisons between standards have been carried out, according to the differing international standards (IEC), e.g. in the USA according to ANSI and/or DOE. This is to ensure that the products tested fulfill all the local requirements.

Related

Source: Schurter

Recent Posts

AEM Introduced High-Power Fuses for Compact Automotive and Industrial Overcurrent Protection

4.9.2026
4

Knowles Cornell Dubilier 105C Flatpack Aluminum Electrolytic Capacitors Target Low-Profile High-Density Power Designs

4.9.2026
5

Vishay Thin Film Chip Resistors Combine up to 50 GHz Operation with High Power Density

3.9.2026
9

Vishay Extends High-Current Common-Mode Chokes with 30 A EMI Filtering up to 150 °C

3.9.2026
14

Bourns Copper-Electrode MOV Series Targets High-Energy Line Surge Protection

1.9.2026
12

Bourns Expands 12 mm SMD Incremental Encoder with Shaft-Length Options for Compact HMI Controls

1.9.2026
8

Bourns UT-A Wirewound Power Resistors Target High-Temperature and Pulse-Load Applications

31.8.2026
19

Filter Capacitors in Electric Vehicles: Knowles Safety MLCCs for BMS and Isolated DC/DC Converters

28.8.2026
44

YAGEO Expands Aluminum Polymer Capacitors for High-Temperature AI Server Power Rails

28.8.2026
59

Upcoming Events

Sep 10
11:00 - 12:00 CEST

Equipment models and model strategies for Space Missions

Sep 16
17:00 - 18:00 CEST

Designing a 5 kW, 800 V-to-50 V PSFB Converter for Next-Generation Data Centers

Sep 29
16:00 - 17:00 CEST

Cybersecurity 2026

View Calendar

Popular Posts

  • Buck Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • LLC Resonant Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Boost Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Earthing Systems and IEC Classification Explained

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • MLCC and Ceramic Capacitors

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Flyback Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Capacitor Charging and Discharging

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Audio Capacitors: Choosing Capacitors for Crossover Circuits

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Resistor Symbols

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Thermistors Basics, NTC and PTC Thermistors

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Newsletter Subscription

 

Passive Components Blog

© 2015–2026
All rights reserved

  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • EPCI Membership & Advertisement
  • About

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Knowledge Blog
  • Dossiers
  • PCNS

© 2015–2026
All rights reserved