• Latest
  • Trending
  • All
  • Capacitors
  • Resistors
  • Inductors
  • Filters
  • Fuses
  • Non-linear Passives
  • Applications
  • Integrated Passives
  • Oscillators
  • Passive Sensors
  • New Technologies
  • Aerospace & Defence
  • Automotive
  • Industrial
  • Market & Supply Chain
  • Medical
  • RF & Microwave
  • Telecommunication

USB PD 3.0 Flyback Transformer Optimisation

30.1.2023

September 23 – Interconnect, Passives & Electromechanical Components Market Insights

3.10.2023

Choosing the Right Noise Filters for Automotive Networks

3.10.2023

Ceramic Capacitors Supporting DC Link Filters

3.10.2023

KYOCERA AVX is Acquiring Bliley Technologies, A Global Leader in Low-Noise Frequency Control Products

3.10.2023

Resonant MLCC OBC Application Guide

2.10.2023

Bourns Releases New Compact Size High Current Ferrite Beads

2.10.2023
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • EPCI Membership & Advertisement
  • About
No Result
View All Result
NEWSLETTER
Passive Components Blog
  • Home
  • NewsFilter
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest

    September 23 – Interconnect, Passives & Electromechanical Components Market Insights

    Choosing the Right Noise Filters for Automotive Networks

    Ceramic Capacitors Supporting DC Link Filters

    KYOCERA AVX is Acquiring Bliley Technologies, A Global Leader in Low-Noise Frequency Control Products

    Resonant MLCC OBC Application Guide

    Bourns Releases New Compact Size High Current Ferrite Beads

    Skeleton Demonstrated Supercapacitor Based Shuttle Charging in Seconds

    NICHICON SLB Small Lithium-Titanate Rechargeable Batteries

    Wk 40 Electronics Supply Chain Digest

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • VideoFilter
    • All
    • Antenna videos
    • Capacitor videos
    • Filter videos
    • Fuse videos
    • Inductor videos
    • Non-linear passives videos
    • Oscillator videos
    • Passive sensors videos
    • Resistor videos
    • Sensors

    Charging/Discharging of Linear andNon-linear Capacitors

    How to Select Inductor For Switching Power Supply

    Oscillators Integration, Selection Guide and Design In

    Input Capacitor Selection for Power Supplies – Part 3: Electrolytic Capacitors

    Input Capacitor Selection for Power Supplies Part 2 – Ceramic Capacitors

    Input Capacitor Selection for Power Supplies Video (Part 1)

    Vishay Webinar: Components Selection for Solar Panel Systems

    Capacitors Basics: Decoupling

    Totem Pole PFC Design for E-Mobility; Microchip and WE Video

    Trending Tags

    • Capacitors explained
    • Inductors explained
    • Resistors explained
    • Filters explained
    • Application Video Guidelines
    • EMC
    • New Products
    • Ripple Current
    • Simulation
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
  • Knowledge Blog
  • Suppliers
    • Preferred Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • Events
  • Home
  • NewsFilter
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest

    September 23 – Interconnect, Passives & Electromechanical Components Market Insights

    Choosing the Right Noise Filters for Automotive Networks

    Ceramic Capacitors Supporting DC Link Filters

    KYOCERA AVX is Acquiring Bliley Technologies, A Global Leader in Low-Noise Frequency Control Products

    Resonant MLCC OBC Application Guide

    Bourns Releases New Compact Size High Current Ferrite Beads

    Skeleton Demonstrated Supercapacitor Based Shuttle Charging in Seconds

    NICHICON SLB Small Lithium-Titanate Rechargeable Batteries

    Wk 40 Electronics Supply Chain Digest

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • VideoFilter
    • All
    • Antenna videos
    • Capacitor videos
    • Filter videos
    • Fuse videos
    • Inductor videos
    • Non-linear passives videos
    • Oscillator videos
    • Passive sensors videos
    • Resistor videos
    • Sensors

    Charging/Discharging of Linear andNon-linear Capacitors

    How to Select Inductor For Switching Power Supply

    Oscillators Integration, Selection Guide and Design In

    Input Capacitor Selection for Power Supplies – Part 3: Electrolytic Capacitors

    Input Capacitor Selection for Power Supplies Part 2 – Ceramic Capacitors

    Input Capacitor Selection for Power Supplies Video (Part 1)

    Vishay Webinar: Components Selection for Solar Panel Systems

    Capacitors Basics: Decoupling

    Totem Pole PFC Design for E-Mobility; Microchip and WE Video

    Trending Tags

    • Capacitors explained
    • Inductors explained
    • Resistors explained
    • Filters explained
    • Application Video Guidelines
    • EMC
    • New Products
    • Ripple Current
    • Simulation
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
  • Knowledge Blog
  • Suppliers
    • Preferred Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • Events
No Result
View All Result
Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result

USB PD 3.0 Flyback Transformer Optimisation

30.1.2023
Reading Time: 8 mins read
A A
84
VIEWS

In this blog article Sotiris Zorbas, MSc, Frenetic power electronics engineer, suggests USB PD 3.0 compatible flyback transformer optimisation, and how to select the best fit core type using the Core Optimizer™️ tool in Frenetic Magnetics design software.

Let’s consider the drawbacks of flyback transformer designs as in example of Frenetic EQ25 design (Figure 1.):

RelatedPosts

Designing a Small Integrated 500W LLC Transformer

Benefits of Custom Cores

Physical Transformer Modelling in LTSpice

1. Flying leads at the secondary side

For those of you that haven’t heard of this before, that’s just one design choice when we have a winding ending. There are two options:

  • Terminate the wire to the coil former pin.
  • Leave some cm of extra wire to solder it directly to the PCB. Although this might seem like a simple design choice, the truth is that doing so creates extra manual labour when it comes to the assembly of the PCB board the flyback transformer will be mounted on to. Human intervention is costly!
Figure 1. Frenetic EQ25 USB PD 3.0 Flyback Transformer (conventional “old” design)

Question: Why do we need flying leads in the first place?

Answer: There are a couple of reasons to go for flying leads. In low power transformers/inductors, the reason is high voltages. For a transformer to pass safety standards and be safe to use, many times the distances of the pins between themselves, or with respect to the core, are not enough. For high power applications, the current levels resulting in the use of big wire dimensions create mounting issues. Up to certain wire dimensions things are simple, and the wires can be soldered to the pins. After a point though, that is not an option anymore and flying leads is the decision to go for.

For the flyback design we’re analysing, the problem is high voltages (up to 375VDC in the primary side). Reinforced insulation was selected and, based on IEC61558-1 automotive standard, >6mm of creepage distance is necessary to pass regulation. The EQ25 design shown in Figure 1 can’t pass the standard, if we terminate the secondary winding to the pins, so flying leads are necessary here.

2. Insulating tape for the core (externally)

Just to remind the situation here, the core itself is made of ferrite. We have a primary and a secondary winding. We insulate the primary and/or the secondary to achieve isolation, comply with the standards and pass Hi-pot testing. But the core itself is considered an electrically conductive material, unless coated with insulation, which is not the case with ferrites.

Therefore, we have a conductive material between isolated windings. The transformer will develop some potential if left floating. A solid design choice is to ground the core, either from it clips or by using some copper tape. Conducted EMI is lowered with this design choice.

Question: At which ground should I ground the core?

Answer: We have 2 grounds in USB-PD 3.0 flyback design. The input ground (which is floating – lethal voltages!) and the output ground (safe to touch). Electrically I don’t find a very good reason why grounding the core to one of the grounds is a better option. But I do find that grounding the core at the secondary – safe to touch – ground is a much better option for obvious reasons!

Figure 2. Flyback design – grounds

Without getting into more details, I’ll say that the wire insulation choices at the primary-secondary will either leave the core grounding options open or limit us to a specific choice.

That is the drawback of the EQ25 design. Grounding the core at the secondary side is not allowed, and we are forced to ground the core on the primary side ground. Insulating tape all around the core is needed, being careful to completely cover the ferrite core.

3. Available coil formers.

Unfortunately, the EQ family is not a standard part. EQ cores are planar cores, and that limits the options of coil formers significantly.

Planar cores are called that way because they are designed for planar transformers. That does not exclude them from the classic coil former style approach. The reverse is also applicable. We can design a planar transformer using standard cores. What’s the price of these choices? Availability issues and a limited range of components choices.

The improved design

Assuming the problems of the previous design, I decided to work on a better version, trying to respect most specs of the previous design to be compatible. The design goals of the new transformer are:

  • No flying leads (solve drawback No1)
  • Core can be grounded on the secondary side ground (solve drawback No2)
  • Standard core (solve drawback No3)
  • Maximum power raised at 100W (previous design at 60W)

Let’s focus now on the core selection process. Other aspects of the design will be discussed in the next Newsletters, so stay tuned!

To start the design, I used the Core Optimizer™️ feature of our magnetics design program. This new powerful tool available in Frenetic Online is helping engineers find the appropriate core for a particular application without having to rely on experience and empirical formulas.

Step 1. Decide on the core family/dimensions

As shown in Figure 3, different families of cores were plotted in a volume-primary turns graph. Using height as the deciding factor, I selected the ETD29/16/10 core. To be honest, other similar high options were also available, but they were excluded because of insulation reasons, that have to do with the non-flying lead design choice, made for this design.

Having the ETD29/16/10 core in mind, I moved on to the second graph of the Core Optimizer, that gave me a clear perspective of the core losses under different operating conditions (worst case scenarios).

Figure 3. Core Optimizer™️
Figure 4. Core losses of different materials – same operating conditions

Step 2. Decide on the core loss target

Core loss target set at <0.5W. Three core materials were selected (for ETD29/16/10). Plotting the core losses under the same operating conditions (worst case scenario), we got the following graph shown in Figure 4.

Figure 5. Core losses at different operating conditions

We see a difference of ~0.1W between 50-100 turns for 3C95-3C97. That’s not a lot and both materials could be used. On the other hand, N87 material is not a good option here, having almost x2 power losses. So I picked the 3C97 material.

Step 3. Decide on the number of turns

In Figure 5, having selected 3C97 material, the core losses are shown for different operating conditions. The worst-case scenario, as far as the core losses are concerned, is the combination of 265VAC input voltage and output power at 100W. Selecting 54 turns would be ok for losses <0.5W, but in the end I chose 56 turns to make sure the turns ratio (Np/Ns = 7) would result in an integer number of secondary turns.

The New ETD29 Transformer Design

You can have a look now at the new ETD29 transformer design in Figure 6. and online with details here.

The table 1. shows the specs and differences between the old and new design.

Figure 6. New Frenetic ETD29 USB PD 3.0 Flyback Transformer
Table 1. Frenetic ETD29 (new) vs EQ25 (old) USB PD 3.0 Flyback Transformer Specification comparison

References

[1]  Applications Engineering Department, “Reference Design Report for a 65 W Power Supply Using InnoSwitchTM3-EP PowiGaNTM INN3679C-H606”, Power Integrations 

Source: Frenetic

Related Posts

Filters

Choosing the Right Noise Filters for Automotive Networks

3.10.2023
4
Capacitors

Ceramic Capacitors Supporting DC Link Filters

3.10.2023
5
Capacitors

Resonant MLCC OBC Application Guide

2.10.2023
18

Upcoming Events

Oct 3
October 3 @ 12:00 - October 5 @ 14:00 EDT

Design and Test of Non-Hermetic Microelectronic

Oct 11
11:00 - 12:00 CEST

Stretchable Electronics

Oct 16
October 16 - October 19

Digital WE Days 2023 – Virtual Conference

View Calendar

Popular Posts

  • What is a Dielectric Constant of Plastic Materials ?

    4 shares
    Share 4 Tweet 0
  • Ripple Current and its Effects on the Performance of Capacitors

    3 shares
    Share 3 Tweet 0
  • Understanding High-Precision Resistor Temperature Coefficient of Resistance

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Leakage Current Characteristics of Capacitors

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Why Low ESR Matters in Capacitor Design

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • How to Choose the Right Inductor for DC-DC Buck Applications

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Capacitor Selection for Coupling and Decoupling Applications

    28 shares
    Share 28 Tweet 0
  • Resonant MLCC OBC Application Guide

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Coefficient of Linear Thermal Expansion on Polymers Explained

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • What is the Difference Between X8G, X8L and X8R Ceramic Capacitor Dielectrics?

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Newsletter Subscription

 

Archive

2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017

Symposium

Passive Components Networking Symposium

Passives e-Learning

Knowledge Blog

  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • EPCI Membership & Advertisement
  • About

© EPCI - Premium Passive Components Educational and Information Site

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Video
  • Knowledge Blog
  • Preferred Suppliers
  • Events

© EPCI - Premium Passive Components Educational and Information Site

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.