Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • NewsFilter
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest

    Samsung Introduced Low ESL 3-Terminal Reverse-Geometry MLCCs for High-Performance ADAS

    Würth Elektronik Presents New Bidirectional Digital Isolators

    Using Stress–Strain Curves to Diagnose Tantalum Powders for Capacitors

    Coilcraft Introduces SMT Current Sense Transformers for High‑Performance Power Electronics

    Samsung Launches Ultra-Compact 008004 High Q MLCC for Next-Generation RF Applications

    Nichicon Extends Rechargeable Batteries Temperature to Rival Supercapacitors

    Two‑capacitor paradox explained for engineers

    YAGEO Releases Compact RJ45 Connector for Multi‑Gigabit Ethernet

    Circuit Protection Technology Annual Dossier

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • VideoFilter
    • All
    • Antenna videos
    • Capacitor videos
    • Circuit Protection Video
    • Filter videos
    • Fuse videos
    • Inductor videos
    • Inter-Connect Video
    • Non-linear passives videos
    • Oscillator videos
    • Passive sensors videos
    • Resistor videos

    Two‑capacitor paradox explained for engineers

    Capacitances of Nonlinear MLCCs: What Datasheets Don’t Tell You

    Tapped Inductor Buck Converter Fundamentals

    Planar vs Conventional Transformer: When it Make Sense

    Modeling Fringing Field Losses in Inductors & Transformers

    Why Power Inductors Use a Ferrite Core With an Air Gap

    Transformer-Based Power-Line Harvester Magnetic Design

    Thermal Modeling of Magnetics

    Standard vs Planar LLC transformers Comparison for Battery Chargers

    Trending Tags

    • Capacitors explained
    • Inductors explained
    • Resistors explained
    • Filters explained
    • Application Video Guidelines
    • EMC
    • New Products
    • Ripple Current
    • Simulation
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
  • Knowledge Blog
  • DossiersNew
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • PCNS
    • PCNS 2025
    • PCNS 2023
    • PCNS 2021
    • PCNS 2019
    • PCNS 2017
  • Events
  • Home
  • NewsFilter
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest

    Samsung Introduced Low ESL 3-Terminal Reverse-Geometry MLCCs for High-Performance ADAS

    Würth Elektronik Presents New Bidirectional Digital Isolators

    Using Stress–Strain Curves to Diagnose Tantalum Powders for Capacitors

    Coilcraft Introduces SMT Current Sense Transformers for High‑Performance Power Electronics

    Samsung Launches Ultra-Compact 008004 High Q MLCC for Next-Generation RF Applications

    Nichicon Extends Rechargeable Batteries Temperature to Rival Supercapacitors

    Two‑capacitor paradox explained for engineers

    YAGEO Releases Compact RJ45 Connector for Multi‑Gigabit Ethernet

    Circuit Protection Technology Annual Dossier

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • VideoFilter
    • All
    • Antenna videos
    • Capacitor videos
    • Circuit Protection Video
    • Filter videos
    • Fuse videos
    • Inductor videos
    • Inter-Connect Video
    • Non-linear passives videos
    • Oscillator videos
    • Passive sensors videos
    • Resistor videos

    Two‑capacitor paradox explained for engineers

    Capacitances of Nonlinear MLCCs: What Datasheets Don’t Tell You

    Tapped Inductor Buck Converter Fundamentals

    Planar vs Conventional Transformer: When it Make Sense

    Modeling Fringing Field Losses in Inductors & Transformers

    Why Power Inductors Use a Ferrite Core With an Air Gap

    Transformer-Based Power-Line Harvester Magnetic Design

    Thermal Modeling of Magnetics

    Standard vs Planar LLC transformers Comparison for Battery Chargers

    Trending Tags

    • Capacitors explained
    • Inductors explained
    • Resistors explained
    • Filters explained
    • Application Video Guidelines
    • EMC
    • New Products
    • Ripple Current
    • Simulation
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
  • Knowledge Blog
  • DossiersNew
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • PCNS
    • PCNS 2025
    • PCNS 2023
    • PCNS 2021
    • PCNS 2019
    • PCNS 2017
  • Events
No Result
View All Result
Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result

Use LT SPICE to analyze input filters

29.8.2022
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A

by Kenneth Wyatt. EMC engineers are often called on to design low-pass filters for client projects, which is usually required to meet radiated susceptibility tests. While the most common radiated-immunity standard (IEC/EN 61000-4-3) requires testing from 80 MHz to 1000 MHz, this case study required immunity from a nearby 50 W, 500 kHz source.

In this case, the prototype product included a simple “PI” filter, comprising a parallel 330 pF capacitor, a series ferrite bead, and a parallel 100 pF capacitor. The load was 4.02 kΩ.

RelatedPosts

Samsung Introduced Low ESL 3-Terminal Reverse-Geometry MLCCs for High-Performance ADAS

Würth Elektronik Presents New Bidirectional Digital Isolators

Using Stress–Strain Curves to Diagnose Tantalum Powders for Capacitors

Figure 1. Basic filter topologies chart. (Source: Würth Electronik)

I thought this would be a good time to use Linear Technology’s free LT SPICE software to perform some quick simulations. LT SPICE is a PC-based analysis software with a convenient schematic entry front-end. It’s also very easy to add voltage and current “probes” throughput your circuit to monitor the performance.

But first, which of the several filter topologies would be most appropriate? Würth Electronik has a very nice filter design section in its book, Trilogy of Magnetics. It turns out the right filter topology depends on the input and out impedances of the system. I’ve reproduced a handy chart (Figure 1) from page 184 of the book that you should copy and tuck into your lab notebook.

For the series filter impedance (the ferrite bead, in this case) to work, it must “see” a low impedance at each end. For example, placing a 200 Ω ferrite bead into a system with 1000 Ω and 4 kΩ input-and-output impedances wouldn’t offer sufficient series impedance to affect interfering signals. On the other hand, that same 200 Ω ferrite would work fine if the input and output impedances were near 1 Ω. That’s the purpose of the parallel capacitors.

In this case, the input impedance to the filter could vary, depending on the sensor impedance, and we knew the output impedance was 4.02 kΩ. The designer had already used a PI filter topology, which should perform well for any impedance from low to high, per the chart.

Figure 2. The input filter to be analyzed.

Here’s the original input filter circuit (Figure 2). For the purposes of this simulation, I ignored the Transzorb® D13. The input is on the left and output on the right.

By inspection, I could tell the current values of capacitors were way too small to provide a low impedance to ground for a frequency of 500 kHz, so the first thing I tried was to increase them to 0.47 µF, each. But first, let’s simulate the current circuit to see where the impedance starts to roll off.

Here’s the LT SPICE simulation (Figure 3). I used an input impedance of 50 Ω, but with the proper valued capacitor, it really doesn’t matter much. Note that the 3 dB rolloff (solid line) occurs about 16 MHz; way too high to help at 500 kHz.

Here’s the final LT SPICE simulation with 0.47 µF capacitors and the ferrite replaced with a 0.47 mH inductor (Figure 4). Note the improved filter starts rolling off at 20 kHz — well below the critical 500 kHz interfering signal and provides about 90 dB of attenuation at 500 kHz. The client was able to use the same real estate on the PC board to mount the new components. While there were other circuit changes and better shielding required, due to the proximity of the source, the filter reduced the high level of interference.

Figure 3. Initial SPICE analysis of the current filter circuit.
Figure 4. Final SPICE analysis of the improved filter circuit.

Related

Source: EDN

Recent Posts

Würth Elektronik Presents New Bidirectional Digital Isolators

20.5.2026
11

Using Stress–Strain Curves to Diagnose Tantalum Powders for Capacitors

20.5.2026
18

Coilcraft Introduces SMT Current Sense Transformers for High‑Performance Power Electronics

20.5.2026
12

Two‑capacitor paradox explained for engineers

18.5.2026
49

ESA SPCD 26 Registration Open

15.5.2026
25

Capacitances of Nonlinear MLCCs: What Datasheets Don’t Tell You

14.5.2026
89

How a Digital Structural Twin Can Predict Tantalum Capacitor Reliability

14.5.2026
64

Tapped Inductor Buck Converter Fundamentals

13.5.2026
44

TAIYO YUDEN Releases Mini Metal Power Inductors

13.5.2026
48

Upcoming Events

Jun 2
16:00 - 17:00 CEST

Calculation, Simulation and Measurement of 800V EMC Filters

Jun 16
16:00 - 17:00 CEST

EMC with EMC – EMC‑compliant design with electromechanical connectors

View Calendar

Popular Posts

  • Buck Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Boost Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Flyback Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • LLC Resonant Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • MLCC and Ceramic Capacitors

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Capacitor Charging and Discharging

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • What Electronics Engineer Needs to Know About Passive Low Pass Filters

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Dual Active Bridge (DAB) Topology

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Ripple Current and its Effects on the Performance of Capacitors

    3 shares
    Share 3 Tweet 0
  • Samsung Electro-Mechanics Releases High-Capacitance MLCCs for AI Server Applications

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Newsletter Subscription

 

Passive Components Blog

© EPCI - Leading Passive Components Educational and Information Site

  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • EPCI Membership & Advertisement
  • About

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Knowledge Blog
  • PCNS

© EPCI - Leading Passive Components Educational and Information Site

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.
Go to mobile version