Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • NewsFilter
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest

    Murata and Xona Partner on LEO Satellite Navigation for Industrial Applications

    Bourns Offers Custom Magnetics for 3‑Phase Flying Capacitor Inverters

    YAGEO Releases Cost Efficient Pt‑RTD Sensors with Ni wires

    Nvidia Vera Rubin: Why One AI Rack Needs So Many More MLCC Capacitors

    Stackpole Introduces 1400A Busbar Shunt Resistors

    Tecate Unveils High‑temp 105C Supercapacitors for Harsh‑Environment Designs

    Bourns Expands 1000V High‑Power Fuses for Semiconductor and Battery Protection

    Passive Components in 2026: From Invisible Commodity to Design Parameter

    Bourns Introduces High Current Chip Ferrite Beads for Dense Power Rails

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • VideoFilter
    • All
    • Antenna videos
    • Capacitor videos
    • Circuit Protection Video
    • Filter videos
    • Fuse videos
    • Inductor videos
    • Inter-Connect Video
    • Non-linear passives videos
    • Oscillator videos
    • Passive sensors videos
    • Resistor videos

    Current Sense Transformer Datasheet and Design‑in Guide

    Designing a USB Type‑C Flyback Planar Transformer with Frenetic’s Planar Tool

    Magnetics Design in High‑Frequency GaN Converters

    Qi2 Wireless Charging: Inductors, Capacitors and EMC Filters

    Two‑capacitor paradox explained for engineers

    Capacitances of Nonlinear MLCCs: What Datasheets Don’t Tell You

    Tapped Inductor Buck Converter Fundamentals

    Planar vs Conventional Transformer: When it Make Sense

    Modeling Fringing Field Losses in Inductors & Transformers

    Trending Tags

    • Capacitors explained
    • Inductors explained
    • Resistors explained
    • Filters explained
    • Application Video Guidelines
    • EMC
    • New Products
    • Ripple Current
    • Simulation
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
  • Knowledge Blog
  • DossiersNew
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • PCNS
    • PCNS 2025
    • PCNS 2023
    • PCNS 2021
    • PCNS 2019
    • PCNS 2017
  • Events
  • Home
  • NewsFilter
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest

    Murata and Xona Partner on LEO Satellite Navigation for Industrial Applications

    Bourns Offers Custom Magnetics for 3‑Phase Flying Capacitor Inverters

    YAGEO Releases Cost Efficient Pt‑RTD Sensors with Ni wires

    Nvidia Vera Rubin: Why One AI Rack Needs So Many More MLCC Capacitors

    Stackpole Introduces 1400A Busbar Shunt Resistors

    Tecate Unveils High‑temp 105C Supercapacitors for Harsh‑Environment Designs

    Bourns Expands 1000V High‑Power Fuses for Semiconductor and Battery Protection

    Passive Components in 2026: From Invisible Commodity to Design Parameter

    Bourns Introduces High Current Chip Ferrite Beads for Dense Power Rails

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • VideoFilter
    • All
    • Antenna videos
    • Capacitor videos
    • Circuit Protection Video
    • Filter videos
    • Fuse videos
    • Inductor videos
    • Inter-Connect Video
    • Non-linear passives videos
    • Oscillator videos
    • Passive sensors videos
    • Resistor videos

    Current Sense Transformer Datasheet and Design‑in Guide

    Designing a USB Type‑C Flyback Planar Transformer with Frenetic’s Planar Tool

    Magnetics Design in High‑Frequency GaN Converters

    Qi2 Wireless Charging: Inductors, Capacitors and EMC Filters

    Two‑capacitor paradox explained for engineers

    Capacitances of Nonlinear MLCCs: What Datasheets Don’t Tell You

    Tapped Inductor Buck Converter Fundamentals

    Planar vs Conventional Transformer: When it Make Sense

    Modeling Fringing Field Losses in Inductors & Transformers

    Trending Tags

    • Capacitors explained
    • Inductors explained
    • Resistors explained
    • Filters explained
    • Application Video Guidelines
    • EMC
    • New Products
    • Ripple Current
    • Simulation
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
  • Knowledge Blog
  • DossiersNew
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • PCNS
    • PCNS 2025
    • PCNS 2023
    • PCNS 2021
    • PCNS 2019
    • PCNS 2017
  • Events
No Result
View All Result
Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result

Researchers Presents High-Performance Carbon-Based Supercapacitors

1.8.2025
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A

Ivan Dědek et al from CATRIN, Palacky University Olomouc, Czech Republic published an article on “High-Performance Carbon-Based Supercapacitors” Published by IOP Publishing Ltd.

Introduction

This article explores the rapidly evolving landscape of carbon-based supercapacitors (SCs), focusing on electric double-layer capacitors (EDLCs).

RelatedPosts

Murata and Xona Partner on LEO Satellite Navigation for Industrial Applications

Bourns Offers Custom Magnetics for 3‑Phase Flying Capacitor Inverters

YAGEO Releases Cost Efficient Pt‑RTD Sensors with Ni wires

These devices offer fast charging, long cycle life, and high power density, making them suitable for a wide range of applications—from consumer electronics to aerospace. The discussion centers on advances in activated carbon (AC), graphene, and their derivatives, while emphasizing the challenges of transitioning high-performance materials from laboratory research to scalable commercial devices. Sustainability and systems-level optimization are recurring themes throughout the article.

Key Points

  • Carbon-based SCs are poised to bridge the gap between traditional capacitors and lithium-ion batteries.
  • Activated carbon and graphene are key electrode materials, but real-world performance lags behind lab results.
  • Device architecture, electrode thickness, and testing methods impact performance outcomes.
  • Emerging materials like N-doped graphene and graphdiyne offer potential but face scalability issues.
  • Electrolyte selection and thermal operating range are critical for optimizing energy and power density.
  • Environmental and safety standards must be met for industrial adoption.

Extended Summary

The article begins by highlighting the role of supercapacitors in meeting the UN’s energy goals through improved electrochemical energy storage. EDLCs offer advantages such as fast charge/discharge cycles, long life, and reduced safety risks. Carbon-based materials, particularly AC and graphene, dominate current SC technology due to their conductivity and abundance.

Real-world SC performance, however, often falls short of lab benchmarks. The discrepancy stems from differences in electrode thickness, device design, and performance reporting standards. Thin lab-scale electrodes perform better due to full ion accessibility, while practical devices with thicker electrodes exhibit lower capacitance. Furthermore, volumetric energy densities tend to be diluted due to excessive porosity and low packing density of nanomaterials like graphene.

The paper explores various carbon materials used for electrodes. Activated carbon, derived from biomass or plastic waste, is porous and cost-effective but hydrophobic. Surface functionalization or N-doping improves ion accessibility and adds pseudocapacitive effects. Graphene, although promising, suffers from restacking issues, which reduce surface area. Curved or defective graphene mitigates these limitations and has already shown scalability in commercial devices. Graphdiyne, a newer carbon allotrope, has great potential but faces production and consistency challenges.

Device form factor influences SC performance. Wound-cell configurations offer manufacturing scalability, while pouch-type cells are ideal for space-constrained designs. Each architecture comes with trade-offs in energy density, mechanical stability, and cost. The market demands SCs with higher energy densities, thermal stability, and compatibility with surface-mount technology, especially for high-temperature reflow soldering.

Electrolytes are crucial for determining performance. Aqueous electrolytes are voltage-limited; organic electrolytes and ionic liquids offer wider windows and better energy density. However, ionic liquids are expensive and often viscous, limiting ion transport. Strategies such as blending ILs with low-viscosity solvents or developing eutectic mixtures are being explored to extend operational temperature ranges.

Manufacturing processes also play a pivotal role. NMP is commonly used as a solvent but poses environmental risks, driving research into safer alternatives like water-based or green organic solvents. Nonetheless, performance trade-offs remain a challenge.

The paper concludes with a call for holistic optimization. Improvements should target not only active materials but also electrolytes, device architecture, and regulatory alignment. Micro-supercapacitors and hybrid devices combining SCs and batteries represent emerging directions. Continued interdisciplinary research is needed to close the performance gap and make carbon-based SCs viable for widespread adoption.

Conclusion

Carbon-based supercapacitors hold significant promise for energy storage solutions that require rapid charge-discharge cycles, safety, and sustainability. While advanced materials such as curved graphene and graphdiyne offer excellent electrochemical properties, industrial implementation is hindered by scalability, cost, and integration challenges. Addressing these requires a systems-level approach, from material innovation to manufacturing processes and regulatory compliance. The future of SCs lies in their adaptability across diverse applications, and with ongoing research, they are well-positioned to become indispensable components of next-generation energy systems.

Read the complete article here:

High-Performance Carbon-Based Supercapacitors, Ivan Dědek, Veronika Šedajová, Vojtěch Kupka, Tomáš Zedníček, Luca Primavesi, Doron Aurbach, Malachi Noked and Michal Otyepka, Accepted Manuscript. Published by IOP Publishing Ltd, DOI 10.1088/2053-1583/adf653, https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2053-1583/adf653

Related

Source: IOP Publishing

Recent Posts

Nvidia Vera Rubin: Why One AI Rack Needs So Many More MLCC Capacitors

2.6.2026
41

Tecate Unveils High‑temp 105C Supercapacitors for Harsh‑Environment Designs

2.6.2026
10

Passive Components in 2026: From Invisible Commodity to Design Parameter

2.6.2026
21

May 2026 Interconnect, Passives and Electromechanical Components Market Insights

29.5.2026
93

Passive Components Enable Safe and Reliable ADAS Architectures

28.5.2026
68

YMIN Releases Square Supercapacitors for AI Server Power System

27.5.2026
51

Exxelia Extends Temperature Range of its PP Film Capacitors to 140C

1.6.2026
47

Nichicon Presents Self-Charging LTO Board for Maintenance-Free IoT Nodes

26.5.2026
28

Mechanical SSC Testing as a Structural Diagnostic Tool for Tantalum Capacitor Anodes

25.5.2026
53

Upcoming Events

Jun 16
16:00 - 17:00 CEST

EMC with EMC – EMC‑compliant design with electromechanical connectors

View Calendar

Popular Posts

  • Buck Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Boost Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Flyback Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • MLCC and Ceramic Capacitors

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • LLC Resonant Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Capacitor Charging and Discharging

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • What Electronics Engineer Needs to Know About Passive Low Pass Filters

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Dual Active Bridge (DAB) Topology

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Ripple Current and its Effects on the Performance of Capacitors

    3 shares
    Share 3 Tweet 0
  • SEPIC Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Newsletter Subscription

 

Passive Components Blog

© EPCI - Leading Passive Components Educational and Information Site

  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • EPCI Membership & Advertisement
  • About

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Knowledge Blog
  • Dossiers
  • PCNS

© EPCI - Leading Passive Components Educational and Information Site

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.
Go to mobile version