Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • NewsFilter
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest

    Benefits of Tantalum Powder Stress–Strain Curve Evaluation vs Conventional Wet Test

    Electrolyte Selection and Performance in Supercapacitors

    Connector PCB Design Challenges

    Researchers Demonstrated High Energy Ceramic Capacitors Stable in Wide Temperature Range

    Stackpole Offers High Voltage Plate Resistors up to 40KV

    How to Manage Supercapacitors Leakage Current and Self Discharge 

    Qualification of Commercial Supercapacitors for Space Applications

    Experimental Evaluation of Wear Failures in SMD Inductors

    Resonant Capacitors in High-Power Resonant Circuits

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • VideoFilter
    • All
    • Antenna videos
    • Capacitor videos
    • Circuit Protection Video
    • Filter videos
    • Fuse videos
    • Inductor videos
    • Inter-Connect Video
    • Non-linear passives videos
    • Oscillator videos
    • Passive sensors videos
    • Resistor videos

    Connector PCB Design Challenges

    Efficient Power Converters: Duty Cycle vs Conduction Losses

    Ripple Steering in Coupled Inductors: SEPIC Case

    SEPIC Converter with Coupled and Uncoupled Inductors

    Coupled Inductors in SEPIC versus Flyback Converters

    Non-Linear MLCC Class II Capacitor Measurements Challenges

    Percolation Phenomenon and Reliability of Molded Power Inductors in DC/DC converters

    Root Causes and Effects of DC Bias and AC in Ceramic Capacitors

    How to Calculate the Output Capacitor for a Switching Power Supply

    Trending Tags

    • Capacitors explained
    • Inductors explained
    • Resistors explained
    • Filters explained
    • Application Video Guidelines
    • EMC
    • New Products
    • Ripple Current
    • Simulation
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
  • Knowledge Blog
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • Events
  • Home
  • NewsFilter
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest

    Benefits of Tantalum Powder Stress–Strain Curve Evaluation vs Conventional Wet Test

    Electrolyte Selection and Performance in Supercapacitors

    Connector PCB Design Challenges

    Researchers Demonstrated High Energy Ceramic Capacitors Stable in Wide Temperature Range

    Stackpole Offers High Voltage Plate Resistors up to 40KV

    How to Manage Supercapacitors Leakage Current and Self Discharge 

    Qualification of Commercial Supercapacitors for Space Applications

    Experimental Evaluation of Wear Failures in SMD Inductors

    Resonant Capacitors in High-Power Resonant Circuits

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • VideoFilter
    • All
    • Antenna videos
    • Capacitor videos
    • Circuit Protection Video
    • Filter videos
    • Fuse videos
    • Inductor videos
    • Inter-Connect Video
    • Non-linear passives videos
    • Oscillator videos
    • Passive sensors videos
    • Resistor videos

    Connector PCB Design Challenges

    Efficient Power Converters: Duty Cycle vs Conduction Losses

    Ripple Steering in Coupled Inductors: SEPIC Case

    SEPIC Converter with Coupled and Uncoupled Inductors

    Coupled Inductors in SEPIC versus Flyback Converters

    Non-Linear MLCC Class II Capacitor Measurements Challenges

    Percolation Phenomenon and Reliability of Molded Power Inductors in DC/DC converters

    Root Causes and Effects of DC Bias and AC in Ceramic Capacitors

    How to Calculate the Output Capacitor for a Switching Power Supply

    Trending Tags

    • Capacitors explained
    • Inductors explained
    • Resistors explained
    • Filters explained
    • Application Video Guidelines
    • EMC
    • New Products
    • Ripple Current
    • Simulation
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
  • Knowledge Blog
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • Events
No Result
View All Result
Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result

How to Suppress Leakage Inductance in Transformer Design

10.10.2023
Reading Time: 7 mins read
A A

In this blog article Pablo Blázquez, Frenetic Power Εlectronics Εngineer is exploring a key element in Transformer design: the leakage inductance!

Leakage Inductance

Leakage inductance is produced by the imperfect magnetic coupling between the transformer windings. The magnetic flux generated in the primary winding is never transferred 100% to the secondary winding. Its magnitude plays a key role in modern switched-mode power supplies. Whether it needs to be minimized or maximized, the use of complex prediction models, which are many times far from reality, is required.

RelatedPosts

Common Mistakes in Flyback Transformer Specs

Accelerating Full Bridge LLC Resonant Converter Design with Frenetic AI

How to design a 60W Flyback Transformer

In cases where higher leakage inductance is required, a magnetic shunt can be inserted between layers, while another possibility would be the use of fractional turns.

Leakage inductance depends on:

  • Winding geometry.
  • Core geometry.
  • Number of turns.

Due to the fact that the winding geometry and arrangement have a high influence on the leakage inductance, it gets really complicated to calculate it analytically and get reliable results. However, if you know the effect these parameters have on the leakage, you will be able to control it.

How to Reduce it?

Here are some solutions to reduce the leakage inductance:

  • Decreasing the number of turns and layers. 
  • Reducing the insulator layer thickness. 
  • Using the interleaving arrangement. 
  • Lowering the mean turn length. 
  • Increasing the core window width.
  • Decreasing the core window height.

The reduction of the leakage inductance is fundamental to obtain better power efficiency, but it goes at the expense of other parameters. For example, reducing the number of turns will also produce higher core losses. On the other hand, it is important to bear in mind the relationship between leakage inductance and parasitic capacitance: lower leakage inductances will lead to higher capacitances (C1= 1/w2 lk1).

In other cases, where higher leakage inductance is required, a magnetic shunt can be inserted between layers. Yet another possibility would be the use of fractional turns.

Experimental Results

Let’s analyse now several case studies with a focus on the leakage inductance. By changing the construction of our transformer and transformer topology, we’ll see what are the effects induced on the leakage inductance value.

Case Study 1: change construction parameters

In this experiment we can see how different cores, winding arrangement and number of turns, while keeping the turns ratio constant, influence the leakage inductance values:

  • Experiment 1: PQ26/25 transformer with a turns ratio of 2:1.
  • Experiment 2: PQ26/25 transformer with a turns ratio of 2:1 but the number of turns is half than in experiment 1. 
  • Experiment 3: PQ26/25 transformer with a turns ratio of 2:1 and P-S-S-P arrangement. 
  • Experiment 4: PQ26/20 transformer with a turns ratio of 2:1 and a P-S-S-P arrangement.
Figure 1. Case Study 1 Results

The results are summarized in Figure 1. Table.

For experiments 1 and 2 show how the reduction of the number of turns leads to a consequent decrease in the leakage inductance.

Comparing experiments 1 and 3, it is clear how the leakage changes when the primary and secondary wires are alternated. Experiments 3 and 4 show the effect of the change in the height of the window: higher core windows will have higher leakage inductances. 

Case Study 2: influence of the winding arrangement in different topologies

Let’s change now the winding arrangement in different topologies and see the effect of the leakage inductance.

Values of leakage inductance will be measured for different converters with four different winding configurations – see Figure 2., from the high-pot winding arrangement (Conf. 1) to two layers interleaving arrangement (Conf. 4) passing through simple P-S configuration (Conf. 2) and simple interleaving (Conf. 3).

Figure 2. Transformer winding arrangement configurations used for the measurements
Table 1. Data of the different converters used in the experiment

Table 1 shows the Converters used for this experiment for each topology with different winding configurations. Results demonstrate how the smaller the difference between primary and secondary turns, and the better the interleaving arrangement, the smaller the leakage inductance achieved.

Case Study 2: Experiment 1

Figure 3 shows how the leakage inductance is reduced by 50% from Conf. 1 to Conf. 3 in an RM8/I. The more the winding is interleaved, the lower the leakage.

Minimization of the leakage inductance in flyback Converters is generally a must, otherwise high voltage spikes at the switching node would be present with the increased stress that this involves in the semiconductors. The interleaved planar Transformer could be used in this case, but taking a special care of the parasitic capacitance that will create a path for common-mode noise.

Figure 3. Leakage inductance in two RM8/I with a turns ratio of 5:1
Figure 4. Leakage inductance in two PQ40/40 with a turns ratio of 8:1

Case Study 2: Experiment 2

In experiment 2, we used a PQ40/40 with a turn ratio of 1:1. The Llk is reduced by a factor of 4. The decrease in the leakage inductance appears as a consequence of the division of the winding on a higher number of layers with interleaving arrangement, from P-S to P-S-P-S arrangement. 

Case Study 2: Experiment 3

Experiment 3 in Figure 4. uses the same core shape as in case 2, but with 8 times higher turns ratio (8:1). Winding Conf. 1 and 2 do not seem very different, however, as we can see in the results, the Llk is reduced 2.6 times, from 5.2 to 2 uH.

Compared to experiment 2, it seems to have lower Llk change. But talking in absolute values, it has a higher impact, as in experiment 2 the leakage is reduced 0.6 uH, and in experiment 7 is of 3.2 uH. 

Conclusions

Knowing the leakage inductance in advance can give you an idea of the total efficiency of the magnetic component before manufacturing it. Theoretical calculations can give you an approach to the leakage inductance of a planar Transformer, but calculations become much harder and less accurate when it is not a planar.

Here is what I’ve learned from this experiment:

  • When turns ratio is closer to 1, we have better coupling between windings and leakage below 1uH.
  • Winding arrangement has a great influence on leakage results.
  • Knowing the leakage value can help you create more efficient designs.

By using Frenetic you can get accurate results of the leakage inductance in your design in a matter of seconds. This will help you further optimize your design and reduce the time you need for designing magnetics.

Related

Source: Frenetic

Recent Posts

Benefits of Tantalum Powder Stress–Strain Curve Evaluation vs Conventional Wet Test

3.10.2025
8

Electrolyte Selection and Performance in Supercapacitors

3.10.2025
7

Connector PCB Design Challenges

3.10.2025
12

Researchers Demonstrated High Energy Ceramic Capacitors Stable in Wide Temperature Range

2.10.2025
17

How to Manage Supercapacitors Leakage Current and Self Discharge 

1.10.2025
21

Experimental Evaluation of Wear Failures in SMD Inductors

1.10.2025
26

Resonant Capacitors in High-Power Resonant Circuits

1.10.2025
24
a Schematic diagram of the BNT-based components constructed based on the entropy-increase strategy. b Digital photograph, cross-sectional SEM image, and EDS mappings of the MLCCs. c Unipolar P-E loops of MLCCs as a function of applied E. d Wrec and η of the MLCCs as a function of applied E. The comparison of (e) Wrec and η, (f) η and UF of the MLCCs with those of other recently reported state-of-the-art MLCCs. source: Nature Communications

Researchers Proposed Enhanced Energy Storage MLCC

1.10.2025
13

Improving SMPS Performance with Thermal Interface Material

30.9.2025
10

Polymer Tantalum Capacitors Beyond AEC-Q200 LEO Satellites

30.9.2025
43

Upcoming Events

Oct 8
11:00 - 12:00 CEST

PCB Online Shop – simply “Made in Germany” by Würth Elektronik

Oct 14
16:00 - 17:00 CEST

Smart Sensors, Smarter AI: Building Reliable Edge Systems

Oct 17
12:00 - 14:00 EDT

External Visual Inspection per MIL-STD-883 TM 2009

Oct 20
October 20 - October 23

Digital WE Days 2025 – Virtual Conference

Oct 21
October 21 @ 12:00 - October 23 @ 14:15 EDT

Space and Military Standards for Hybrids and RF Microwave Modules

View Calendar

Popular Posts

  • Buck Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Boost Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Flyback Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • LLC Resonant Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • SEPIC Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Dual Active Bridge (DAB) Topology Explained

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Ripple Current and its Effects on the Performance of Capacitors

    3 shares
    Share 3 Tweet 0
  • What is a Dielectric Constant and DF of Plastic Materials?

    4 shares
    Share 4 Tweet 0
  • Flying Capacitors Explained

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • MLCC and Ceramic Capacitors

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Newsletter Subscription

 

Passive Components Blog

© EPCI - Leading Passive Components Educational and Information Site

  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • EPCI Membership & Advertisement
  • About

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Knowledge Blog
  • Premium Suppliers

© EPCI - Leading Passive Components Educational and Information Site

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.
Go to mobile version