Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • NewsFilter
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest

    YAGEO Introduces High Rel MLCCs Beyond MIL-Spec Limits

    Würth Elektronik Expanded Capacity for Validation and Services in Asia

    Samsung Introduces Ultra-High-Voltage 1500 V MLCCs for xEV Powertrains

    YAGEO Q1 2026 Results: AI Servers and Pricing Power Behind a Moderate Q2 Outlook

    TDK Introduces High‑Voltage Common‑Mode Chokes for Compact 1250 V DC Converters

    Vishay Extends Power Inductors for DC/DC with 1212 Compact Case

    Modeling Planar Magnetics Temperature: Practical Guidelines for Power Electronics Engineers

    YAGEO Releases Ferrite Shielded Power Inductors for High‑Density Designs

    Samsung Presents MLCC Selection Guide for Humanoids and Robotic Applications

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • VideoFilter
    • All
    • Antenna videos
    • Capacitor videos
    • Circuit Protection Video
    • Filter videos
    • Fuse videos
    • Inductor videos
    • Inter-Connect Video
    • Non-linear passives videos
    • Oscillator videos
    • Passive sensors videos
    • Resistor videos

    Transformer-Based Power-Line Harvester Magnetic Design

    Thermal Modeling of Magnetics

    Standard vs Planar LLC transformers Comparison for Battery Chargers

    How Modern Tools Model Magnetic Components for Power Electronics

    Advanced Loss Modeling for Planar Magnetics in the Frenetic Planar Tool

    2026 Power Magnetics Design Trends: Flyback, DAB and Planar

    Enabling Software‑Defined Vehicle Architectures: Automotive Ethernet and Zonal Smart Power

    Calculating Resistance Value of a Flyback RC Snubber 

    One‑Pulse Characterization of Nonlinear Power Inductors

    Trending Tags

    • Capacitors explained
    • Inductors explained
    • Resistors explained
    • Filters explained
    • Application Video Guidelines
    • EMC
    • New Products
    • Ripple Current
    • Simulation
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
  • Knowledge Blog
  • DossiersNew
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • PCNS
    • PCNS 2025
    • PCNS 2023
    • PCNS 2021
    • PCNS 2019
    • PCNS 2017
  • Events
  • Home
  • NewsFilter
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest

    YAGEO Introduces High Rel MLCCs Beyond MIL-Spec Limits

    Würth Elektronik Expanded Capacity for Validation and Services in Asia

    Samsung Introduces Ultra-High-Voltage 1500 V MLCCs for xEV Powertrains

    YAGEO Q1 2026 Results: AI Servers and Pricing Power Behind a Moderate Q2 Outlook

    TDK Introduces High‑Voltage Common‑Mode Chokes for Compact 1250 V DC Converters

    Vishay Extends Power Inductors for DC/DC with 1212 Compact Case

    Modeling Planar Magnetics Temperature: Practical Guidelines for Power Electronics Engineers

    YAGEO Releases Ferrite Shielded Power Inductors for High‑Density Designs

    Samsung Presents MLCC Selection Guide for Humanoids and Robotic Applications

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • VideoFilter
    • All
    • Antenna videos
    • Capacitor videos
    • Circuit Protection Video
    • Filter videos
    • Fuse videos
    • Inductor videos
    • Inter-Connect Video
    • Non-linear passives videos
    • Oscillator videos
    • Passive sensors videos
    • Resistor videos

    Transformer-Based Power-Line Harvester Magnetic Design

    Thermal Modeling of Magnetics

    Standard vs Planar LLC transformers Comparison for Battery Chargers

    How Modern Tools Model Magnetic Components for Power Electronics

    Advanced Loss Modeling for Planar Magnetics in the Frenetic Planar Tool

    2026 Power Magnetics Design Trends: Flyback, DAB and Planar

    Enabling Software‑Defined Vehicle Architectures: Automotive Ethernet and Zonal Smart Power

    Calculating Resistance Value of a Flyback RC Snubber 

    One‑Pulse Characterization of Nonlinear Power Inductors

    Trending Tags

    • Capacitors explained
    • Inductors explained
    • Resistors explained
    • Filters explained
    • Application Video Guidelines
    • EMC
    • New Products
    • Ripple Current
    • Simulation
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
  • Knowledge Blog
  • DossiersNew
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • PCNS
    • PCNS 2025
    • PCNS 2023
    • PCNS 2021
    • PCNS 2019
    • PCNS 2017
  • Events
No Result
View All Result
Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result

Cornell Dubilier: Why Military and Aerospace Designers Are Turning to Aluminum Electrolytic Capacitors

24.9.2017
Reading Time: 5 mins read
A A

Source: Electronics 360 article

Early conventional aluminum electrolytic capacitors were known to lose electrolyte over time through outgassing. The loss of electrolyte, called dry-out, results in loss of capacitance and increases in ESR. Modern packaging technology has resulted in commercially available parts with improved seals as compared with the electrolytic types of yesteryear, but even the newer components lose some electrolyte over time and concerns about dry-out persist today.

RelatedPosts

YAGEO Introduces High Rel MLCCs Beyond MIL-Spec Limits

Würth Elektronik Expanded Capacity for Validation and Services in Asia

Samsung Introduces Ultra-High-Voltage 1500 V MLCCs for xEV Powertrains

Military and aerospace engineers are integrating COTS parts where appropriate but tend to favor electrolytic capacitors with tight seals and true hermetic capacitors, including hermetic wet tantalum capacitors, for their mission critical applications.

Figure 1. Non-hermetic Flatpack aluminum electrolytics are used in fighter aircraft and ground-based and ship-board radar. Source: Cornell DubilierFigure 1. Non-hermetic Flatpack aluminum electrolytics are used in fighter aircraft and ground-based and ship-board radar. Source: Cornell Dubilier

Cornell Dubilier’s Flatpack aluminum electrolytic capacitors have made inroads into military and aerospace applications, largely due to their highly reliable seals, long life and space-saving, flat form factor. Over the past two decades they have been used extensively in power supplies for military and commercial aircraft, as well as ground-based and ship-board radar systems.

The Hermetic Slimpack

About one year ago, Cornell Dubilier introduced a hermetically sealed aluminum electrolytic capacitor called the MLSH Slimpack, which offers a true glass-to-metal seal housed in a stainless steel case that results in no electrolyte loss and no dry-out. With stainless steel cases and welded seals, these capacitors (measuring 1.0 x 1.5 x 0.5 in.) are built to withstand the challenging environments of military and aerospace applications.

Figure 2. The graph compares the weight loss of electrolyte over time for a non-hermetic Flatpack versus a hermetically sealed MLSH Slimpack. Although the weight loss for non-hermetic Flatpack capacitors is minuscule, as indicated by the orange curve, the blue line on the graph shows that the hermetically sealed MLSH Slimpack has not lost electrolyte over time on test. Source: Cornell DubilierFigure 2. The graph compares the weight loss of electrolyte over time for a non-hermetic Flatpack versus a hermetically sealed MLSH Slimpack. Although the weight loss for non-hermetic Flatpack capacitors is minuscule, as indicated by the orange curve, the blue line on the graph shows that the hermetically sealed MLSH Slimpack has not lost electrolyte over time on test. Source: Cornell Dubilier

Advantages of MLSH Hermetic Slimpack Over Wet Tantalum

With the concern for dry-out addressed, aerospace and military designers are taking advantage of the benefits of the Hermetic Slimpack aluminum electrolytic capacitors. One of the most striking advantages of aluminum electrolytic capacitor technology versus wet tantalum is its superior capacitance retention at low temperatures. Most military aerospace electronics circuits must be designed to operate at -55° C. Wet tantalum capacitors have poor capacitance retention at low temperatures, making it necessary for the design engineer to integrate more wet tantalum capacitors in parallel just to meet the minimum capacitance required at -55° C.

Figure 3. The table compares one MLSH Hermetic Slimpack (2200 µF @ 40 Vdc) with a parallel bank of four (1000 µF @ 40 Vdc) wet tantalum caps. The high temperature (125° C) capacitance of the wet tantalum bank is much higher, but at -55° C the roll-off in the wet tantalum capacitance is huge, measuring less than the single MLSH capacitor. The single MLSH capacitor also weighs less than four wet tantalums and its cost is roughly half that of the wet tantalum solution. Source: Cornell Dubilier          

Figure 3. The table compares one MLSH Hermetic Slimpack (2200 µF @ 40 Vdc) with a parallel bank of four (1000 µF @ 40 Vdc) wet tantalum caps.

The high temperature (125° C) capacitance of the wet tantalum bank is much higher, but at -55° C the roll-off in the wet tantalum capacitance is huge, measuring less than the single MLSH capacitor. The single MLSH capacitor also weighs less than four wet tantalums and its cost is roughly half that of the wet tantalum solution. Source: Cornell Dubilier

Another important advantage to the Hermetic Slimpack is that voltage ratings are readily available up to 250 Vdc @ 125° C, while the maximum rated voltage of wet tantalum capacitors at the same temperature is 85 Vdc. For applications greater than 85 Vdc, it is necessary to use two or more wet tantalum capacitors in series.

Circuit designs that use a single component versus multiple components offer greater reliability as there is less risk of failure when fewer components and connection points are relied upon.

Hermetic Slimpack capacitors are made as every bit robust as their wet tantalum counterparts. These devices can handle up to 80 G of vibration, withstand altitudes of 80,000 ft. and offer exceedingly long life of 5000 hours at 125° C without de-rating for voltage. Standard ratings for the MLSH Hermetic Slimpack range from 220 µF to 24,000 µF in 30 Vdc to 250 Vdc at their full-rated temperature of 125° C.

Looking Toward the Future

While the new technology is not a drop-in replacement for multiple wet tantalum capacitors (although it can’t be ruled out), the next generation of military and aerospace designs focused on aircraft and equipment two to three years down the road might well reap the benefits of these rugged components.

Figure 4. Slimpack aluminum electrolytic capacitors are rugged and able to withstand high altitudes, making them well-suited for military and aerospace applications. Source: Cornell DubilierFigure 4. Slimpack aluminum electrolytic capacitors are rugged and able to withstand high altitudes, making them well-suited for military and aerospace applications. Source: Cornell Dubilier

As more designers learn about the benefits of the technology, there may be a sea change where these discrete components become the preferred option in the design of future aircraft, military equipment or even spacecraft.

Cornell Dubilier has not specifically aimed its Slimpack aluminum electrolytic capacitors at the space market, but the company knows that the devices can withstand the harsh conditions of space. However, they require more energy density than what is currently offered. As of yet, Cornell Dubilier has not released a standard product for space, but the company is exploring the option for future iterations of spacecraft and satellites.

Next Generations Welcome

Cornell Dubilier has a variety of options to choose from when selecting a hermetically sealed aluminum electrolytic capacitor for your next-generation aerospace or military designs. For more than 20 years, the company has been in the business of delivering these capacitors to market and with its latest innovation, designers no longer need to fear dry-out occurring while receiving the additional functionality that these discrete components bring to the table.

Related

Recent Posts

YAGEO Introduces High Rel MLCCs Beyond MIL-Spec Limits

16.4.2026
4

KYOCERA AVX MIL-PRF-32535 BME NP0 MLCCs Approved to the DLA QPD

16.4.2026
20

ECIA March 2026 Industry Pulse Points to Best Sales Climate in Five Years

13.4.2026
29

Exxelia Releases Updated Microwave Materials and Frequency Tuning Catalogues

8.4.2026
18

Molex Completes Acquisition of Smiths Interconnect, Expanding Portfolio of High-Reliability Connectivity Solutions

1.4.2026
14

New J‑STD‑075B Standard Elevates Process Sensitivity Classification for Passive and Solid-State Components

27.3.2026
64

Exxelia Miniaturized 400 MHz Inverted‑F Antenna

24.3.2026
16

Samsung Electro-Mechanics Enters LEO Satellite Market With High‑Reliability MLCCs

19.3.2026
64

Vishay Introduced Space-Grade SMT Common Mode Choke

19.3.2026
34

Upcoming Events

Apr 21
16:00 - 17:00 CEST

Heatsink Solutions: Thermal Management in electronic devices

Apr 22
17:00 - 17:30 CEST

Magnetics in a high frequency GaN era

Apr 22
17:00 - 18:00 CEST

Derating Tantalum, Film, and Ceramic Capacitors

View Calendar

Popular Posts

  • Buck Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Boost Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Flyback Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • LLC Resonant Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • MLCC and Ceramic Capacitors

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Dual Active Bridge (DAB) Topology

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Capacitor Charging and Discharging

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Plastic Materials Dielectric Constant and DF

    4 shares
    Share 4 Tweet 0
  • MLCC Case Sizes Standards Explained

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Ripple Current and its Effects on the Performance of Capacitors

    3 shares
    Share 3 Tweet 0

Newsletter Subscription

 

Passive Components Blog

© EPCI - Leading Passive Components Educational and Information Site

  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • EPCI Membership & Advertisement
  • About

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Knowledge Blog
  • PCNS

© EPCI - Leading Passive Components Educational and Information Site

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.
Go to mobile version