Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • NewsFilter
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest

    Binder Hybrid Connector Simplifies One Cable Automation

    Tapped Inductor Buck Converter Fundamentals

    TAIYO YUDEN Releases Mini Metal Power Inductors

    Molecular Memristor Shows Record 145 kH Emergent Inductance

    Planar vs Conventional Transformer: When it Make Sense

    Researchers Propose Next‑Gen Compact Memory Using Ultra-thin Ferroelectric Capacitors

    Nichicon ADN Automotive Hybrid Aluminum Capacitors Now Available in EMEA

    Wk 19 Electronics Supply Chain Digest

    Electrocaloric Multilayer Capacitors: Towards Quiet, Solid‑State Cooling Around Room Temperature

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • VideoFilter
    • All
    • Antenna videos
    • Capacitor videos
    • Circuit Protection Video
    • Filter videos
    • Fuse videos
    • Inductor videos
    • Inter-Connect Video
    • Non-linear passives videos
    • Oscillator videos
    • Passive sensors videos
    • Resistor videos

    Tapped Inductor Buck Converter Fundamentals

    Planar vs Conventional Transformer: When it Make Sense

    Modeling Fringing Field Losses in Inductors & Transformers

    Why Power Inductors Use a Ferrite Core With an Air Gap

    Transformer-Based Power-Line Harvester Magnetic Design

    Thermal Modeling of Magnetics

    Standard vs Planar LLC transformers Comparison for Battery Chargers

    How Modern Tools Model Magnetic Components for Power Electronics

    Advanced Loss Modeling for Planar Magnetics in the Frenetic Planar Tool

    Trending Tags

    • Capacitors explained
    • Inductors explained
    • Resistors explained
    • Filters explained
    • Application Video Guidelines
    • EMC
    • New Products
    • Ripple Current
    • Simulation
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
  • Knowledge Blog
  • DossiersNew
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • PCNS
    • PCNS 2025
    • PCNS 2023
    • PCNS 2021
    • PCNS 2019
    • PCNS 2017
  • Events
  • Home
  • NewsFilter
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest

    Binder Hybrid Connector Simplifies One Cable Automation

    Tapped Inductor Buck Converter Fundamentals

    TAIYO YUDEN Releases Mini Metal Power Inductors

    Molecular Memristor Shows Record 145 kH Emergent Inductance

    Planar vs Conventional Transformer: When it Make Sense

    Researchers Propose Next‑Gen Compact Memory Using Ultra-thin Ferroelectric Capacitors

    Nichicon ADN Automotive Hybrid Aluminum Capacitors Now Available in EMEA

    Wk 19 Electronics Supply Chain Digest

    Electrocaloric Multilayer Capacitors: Towards Quiet, Solid‑State Cooling Around Room Temperature

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • VideoFilter
    • All
    • Antenna videos
    • Capacitor videos
    • Circuit Protection Video
    • Filter videos
    • Fuse videos
    • Inductor videos
    • Inter-Connect Video
    • Non-linear passives videos
    • Oscillator videos
    • Passive sensors videos
    • Resistor videos

    Tapped Inductor Buck Converter Fundamentals

    Planar vs Conventional Transformer: When it Make Sense

    Modeling Fringing Field Losses in Inductors & Transformers

    Why Power Inductors Use a Ferrite Core With an Air Gap

    Transformer-Based Power-Line Harvester Magnetic Design

    Thermal Modeling of Magnetics

    Standard vs Planar LLC transformers Comparison for Battery Chargers

    How Modern Tools Model Magnetic Components for Power Electronics

    Advanced Loss Modeling for Planar Magnetics in the Frenetic Planar Tool

    Trending Tags

    • Capacitors explained
    • Inductors explained
    • Resistors explained
    • Filters explained
    • Application Video Guidelines
    • EMC
    • New Products
    • Ripple Current
    • Simulation
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
  • Knowledge Blog
  • DossiersNew
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • PCNS
    • PCNS 2025
    • PCNS 2023
    • PCNS 2021
    • PCNS 2019
    • PCNS 2017
  • Events
No Result
View All Result
Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result

Detecting Defective MLCCs with Inaccurate Margin Ratios

18.12.2024
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A

Korean researchers published their study of “Detection and segmentation framework for defect detection on multi-layer ceramic capacitors” in ETRI Journal.

Detecting defective multi-layer ceramic capacitors (MLCCs) during the inspection stage is a crucial production task to effectively manage production yield and maintain quality.

RelatedPosts

Binder Hybrid Connector Simplifies One Cable Automation

Tapped Inductor Buck Converter Fundamentals

TAIYO YUDEN Releases Mini Metal Power Inductors

However, this task presents two challenges: the necessity of pixel-level segmentation in high-resolution images and unexplored defect patterns. To address these challenges, this paper introduces an MLCC defect-detection framework based on deep learning with an MLCC dataset we constructed and a comprehensive analysis of MLCC images.

Our framework employs an object-detection model to identify dielectric regions in input MLCC images, followed by a semantic segmentation model to create dielectric masks for calculating the margin ratio. This approach follows the traditional inspection process but can be performed without specialized personnel. Furthermore, we generated pseudo-defect images using generative adversarial networks to obtain sufficient training data. Experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework, which achieved a defect-detection accuracy of 93.1%, as revealed by an in-depth error analysis.

INTRODUCTION

Multi-layer ceramic capacitors (MLCCs) are widely used in electronic products such as mobile devices and autonomous vehicles, contributing to a growing demand. To effectively manage high-quality production yields, it is crucial to detect defective MLCCs.

The production process encompasses an inspection stage, which examines the alignment of stacked MLCCs and identifies defects at an early stage. The inspection stage is divided into three steps: i) dielectric detection, ii) dielectric segmentation, and iii) margin inspection. An MLCC cross-sectional image is analyzed to determine the dielectric region. Subsequently, pixel-level segmentation is performed to create dielectric masks within the detected regions. Finally, the margin ratio is computed using the dielectric masks to determine whether the MLCC is defective.

Existing methods for dielectric detection rely on visual assessments and manual interventions by operators, which can reduce accuracy. In addition, histogram-based algorithms for dielectric segmentation have limitations such as the potential misidentification of patterns caused by noise and lifting. These limitations can lead to errors in detecting defective MLCCs due to inaccurate margin ratios. Recently, defect-detection methods in semiconductor manufacturing have been enhanced using deep-learning models trained on large datasets and have outperformed traditional algorithms. Representative methods employ object detection or image classification models to identify defect patterns within scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images or wafer maps, effectively eliminating the need for specialized personnel. However, MLCC defect detection remains challenging for two reasons. First, pixel-level segmentation is essential for calculating the margin ratio for each row; however, it requires extensive computations for high-resolution cross-sectional images (for example, 2048 × 2048). Therefore, an efficient method is necessary for handling high-resolution images that are continuously generated by multiple production lines. Second, MLCC defect patterns remain relatively unexplored because of the absence of benchmark or in-house datasets.

To address these challenges, this study presents an MLCC defect-detection framework that effectively interprets the inspection stage by leveraging appropriate deep-learning-based detection and segmentation models, which are trained on our constructed MLCC defect dataset. As shown in Figure 1, our framework consists of three parts. First, an object-detection model is employed to identify the dielectric regions within an MLCC cross-sectional image. Second, a semantic segmentation model is used to identify the dielectric masks within each region. Finally, the margin ratios are computed based on the identified dielectric masks. More precisely, we obtain dielectric masks by segmenting only the dielectric regions rather than the entire image. Our MLCC defect dataset, consisting of 3000 cross-sectional images, was constructed for training and evaluation. In a comprehensive analysis of the MLCC images, we identified three types of defects. However, we faced challenges in gathering sufficient defective patterns during data collection because of a shortage of defective MLCCs. It is evident that insufficient training data leads to low performance. To address this limitation, we employed pseudo-defect images generated using a generative adversarial network (GAN), which significantly enhanced performance. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study on the detection of MLCC defects using deep learning. Our approach is distinctive in systemizing and automating the current MLCC defect-detection process. The main contributions of this study are summarized as follows:

  • We propose an MLCC defect-detection framework that employs deep-learning models for object detection and semantic segmentation rather than classification, representing a pioneering effort in systemizing and automating the MLCC defect-detection process using deep learning.
  • We validated the effectiveness of our framework on our MLCC defect dataset constructed through a comprehensive analysis identifying the characteristics of three distinct defect types. We leveraged a GAN to mitigate the challenges of insufficient data by generating pseudo-defect images.

CONCLUSION

This paper proposes a deep-learning-based MLCC defect-detection framework composed of dielectric detection, dielectric segmentation, and margin ratio computation.

Our framework is pioneering research in the systemization and automation of the MLCC defect-detection process that addresses the absence of public or in-house MLCC datasets.

We constructed an MLCC defect dataset of 3000 cross-sectional images for training and evaluation. To overcome the problem of insufficient training data, we generated pseudo-images with various defect patterns using a GAN.

We demonstrated the superiority of our framework through a comprehensive error analysis of our MLCC dataset. In future research, we plan to investigate additional MLCC images to uncover defect patterns and develop a unified model for dielectric detection and segmentation.

Read the full paper at the link:

Heung-Seon Oh, School of Computer Science Engineering, University of Technology and Education, Cheonan, Republic of Korea, Detection and segmentation framework for defect detection on multi-layer ceramic capacitors, https://doi.org/10.4218/etrij.2024-0066

Related

Source: ETRI Journal

Recent Posts

Tapped Inductor Buck Converter Fundamentals

13.5.2026
11

Molecular Memristor Shows Record 145 kH Emergent Inductance

12.5.2026
11

Planar vs Conventional Transformer: When it Make Sense

11.5.2026
36

Researchers Propose Next‑Gen Compact Memory Using Ultra-thin Ferroelectric Capacitors

11.5.2026
28

Nichicon ADN Automotive Hybrid Aluminum Capacitors Now Available in EMEA

11.5.2026
23

Electrocaloric Multilayer Capacitors: Towards Quiet, Solid‑State Cooling Around Room Temperature

7.5.2026
186

High-Crystallinity Nanocrystalline Composites for MHz Chip Inductors

7.5.2026
64

KYOCERA 10 µF 0201 MLCC Brings High‑Capacitance into Mobile Designs

6.5.2026
54

Energy Localization in Tantalum Anode Formation: A Structural Perspective

4.5.2026
47

Upcoming Events

May 19
16:00 - 17:00 CEST

Designing Qi2 Wireless Power Systems: Practical Development and EMC Optimization

Jun 2
16:00 - 17:00 CEST

Calculation, Simulation and Measurement of 800V EMC Filters

Jun 16
16:00 - 17:00 CEST

EMC with EMC – EMC‑compliant design with electromechanical connectors

View Calendar

Popular Posts

  • Buck Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Boost Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Flyback Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • LLC Resonant Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • MLCC and Ceramic Capacitors

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Dual Active Bridge (DAB) Topology

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Capacitor Charging and Discharging

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • What Electronics Engineer Needs to Know About Passive Low Pass Filters

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Ripple Current and its Effects on the Performance of Capacitors

    3 shares
    Share 3 Tweet 0
  • MLCC Case Sizes Standards Explained

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Newsletter Subscription

 

Passive Components Blog

© EPCI - Leading Passive Components Educational and Information Site

  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • EPCI Membership & Advertisement
  • About

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Knowledge Blog
  • PCNS

© EPCI - Leading Passive Components Educational and Information Site

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.
Go to mobile version