Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • NewsFilter
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest

    Binder Extends NCC Circular Connectors for Harsh Environments

    Standard vs Planar LLC transformers Comparison for Battery Chargers

    Würth Elektronik and Grinn Launch Edge AI Cooperation

    Bourns Expanded Semi-Shielded Low Profile Automotive Power Inductor

    Peak Nano to Develop Fusion Grade High Energy Film Capacitors

    Murata New Vibration Sensor Targets High‑Frequency Predictive Maintenance

    Kyocera Releases 30fs Jitter Differential Clock Oscillator

    Panasonic Expands Automotive PP Film Capacitors Voltage Range

    Panasonic Extends Automotive Power Inductor Line

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • VideoFilter
    • All
    • Antenna videos
    • Capacitor videos
    • Circuit Protection Video
    • Filter videos
    • Fuse videos
    • Inductor videos
    • Inter-Connect Video
    • Non-linear passives videos
    • Oscillator videos
    • Passive sensors videos
    • Resistor videos

    Standard vs Planar LLC transformers Comparison for Battery Chargers

    How Modern Tools Model Magnetic Components for Power Electronics

    Advanced Loss Modeling for Planar Magnetics in the Frenetic Planar Tool

    2026 Power Magnetics Design Trends: Flyback, DAB and Planar

    Enabling Software‑Defined Vehicle Architectures: Automotive Ethernet and Zonal Smart Power

    Calculating Resistance Value of a Flyback RC Snubber 

    One‑Pulse Characterization of Nonlinear Power Inductors

    Thermistor Linearization Challenges

    Coaxial Connectors and How to Connect with PCB

    Trending Tags

    • Capacitors explained
    • Inductors explained
    • Resistors explained
    • Filters explained
    • Application Video Guidelines
    • EMC
    • New Products
    • Ripple Current
    • Simulation
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
  • Knowledge Blog
  • DossiersNew
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • PCNS
    • PCNS 2025
    • PCNS 2023
    • PCNS 2021
    • PCNS 2019
    • PCNS 2017
  • Events
  • Home
  • NewsFilter
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest

    Binder Extends NCC Circular Connectors for Harsh Environments

    Standard vs Planar LLC transformers Comparison for Battery Chargers

    Würth Elektronik and Grinn Launch Edge AI Cooperation

    Bourns Expanded Semi-Shielded Low Profile Automotive Power Inductor

    Peak Nano to Develop Fusion Grade High Energy Film Capacitors

    Murata New Vibration Sensor Targets High‑Frequency Predictive Maintenance

    Kyocera Releases 30fs Jitter Differential Clock Oscillator

    Panasonic Expands Automotive PP Film Capacitors Voltage Range

    Panasonic Extends Automotive Power Inductor Line

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • VideoFilter
    • All
    • Antenna videos
    • Capacitor videos
    • Circuit Protection Video
    • Filter videos
    • Fuse videos
    • Inductor videos
    • Inter-Connect Video
    • Non-linear passives videos
    • Oscillator videos
    • Passive sensors videos
    • Resistor videos

    Standard vs Planar LLC transformers Comparison for Battery Chargers

    How Modern Tools Model Magnetic Components for Power Electronics

    Advanced Loss Modeling for Planar Magnetics in the Frenetic Planar Tool

    2026 Power Magnetics Design Trends: Flyback, DAB and Planar

    Enabling Software‑Defined Vehicle Architectures: Automotive Ethernet and Zonal Smart Power

    Calculating Resistance Value of a Flyback RC Snubber 

    One‑Pulse Characterization of Nonlinear Power Inductors

    Thermistor Linearization Challenges

    Coaxial Connectors and How to Connect with PCB

    Trending Tags

    • Capacitors explained
    • Inductors explained
    • Resistors explained
    • Filters explained
    • Application Video Guidelines
    • EMC
    • New Products
    • Ripple Current
    • Simulation
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
  • Knowledge Blog
  • DossiersNew
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • PCNS
    • PCNS 2025
    • PCNS 2023
    • PCNS 2021
    • PCNS 2019
    • PCNS 2017
  • Events
No Result
View All Result
Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result

Photoemission spectroscopy XPS how it works and assist in EEE parts analysis

6.6.2019
Reading Time: 5 mins read
A A

Source: Alter Technology article

by Francisco Javier Aparicio Rebollo, Senior materials and Test Engineer at Alter Technology.

RelatedPosts

Binder Extends NCC Circular Connectors for Harsh Environments

Standard vs Planar LLC transformers Comparison for Battery Chargers

Würth Elektronik and Grinn Launch Edge AI Cooperation

X-ray photoemission spectroscopy (XPS) also known as electron spectroscopy for chemical analysis (ESCA) is a surface-sensitive quantitative analysis method to accurately determine the elemental composition of solid materials.

The technique is the most extended tool for the chemical characterization of thin films coatings and surfaces either for industrial applications as well as for research. Amongst others, this is so due to:

  • The non-destructive
  • The broad analysis window that cover all the elements unless H and He.
  • The high sensitivity.
    • For heavy metals detection limit < 0.005 % atomic concertation (ppm in weight).
    • For light organic and inorganic elements detection limit < 1 %.
  • Free of matrix effects which compromise the reliability of other techniques such as EDS, XRF, and FTIR.

Practical Applications

The figure shows a representative example of the XPS survey spectrum of a sample containing both heavy and light elements of interest for technological applications. This illustrates the suitability of the technique for the simultaneous detection of either heavy and light nucleus within the limit Z > 2. Hence, XPS is one of the most reliable approaches for the non-destructive quantification of the atomic concentration in solid coatings.

featured image: example of XPS survey spectrum

Considering the low escape depth of the photoelectrons the inspection thickness of typical XPS instruments is of ≈ 1-3 nm. This makes this technique the most suitable for the thin-film and surface applications and processes. Nonetheless, is not so surface sensitive that the inevitable contamination developed during industrial processes completely hidden the actual sample composition, in contrast to other techniques that require ultra-high cleanliness levels only achievable by preconditioning by sputtering.

Considering the low escape depth of the photoelectrons the inspection thickness of typical XPS instruments is of ≈ 1-3 nm. This makes this technique the most suitable for the thin-film and surface applications and processes. Nonetheless, is not so surface sensitive that the inevitable contamination developed during industrial processes completely hidden the actual sample composition, in contrast to other techniques that require ultra-high cleanliness levels only achievable by preconditioning by sputtering.

XPS analysis is demanded many industrial applications where the surface composition is a critical factor:XPS analysis

  • Photovoltaics.
  • Electronics devices and EEE parts.
  • Packaging systems.
  • Display technology.
  • Magnetic media.
  • Corrosion (oxidation).

How it works

XPS working principle is based upon the photoelectric effect described in the figure.

XPS Working principle

When a photon impinges into the sample surface its energy can be absorbed completely by the electronic cloud of the atoms present in the sample. If the energy is high enough, this can cause the sample ionization and the ejection of the so-called photoelectrons with a kinetic energy that according to the Einstein equation [1] is determined by the electron binding energy of the ejected electron and photon energy.

Ekinetic = hν – Ebinding                                                                                        [1]

The binding energy of valence band electrons does not only depend on the elemental composition but also on the material characteristics such as the crystalline phase and others, whereas in the case of internal core electrons the binding energy is characteristics of the atoms source and the electronic level. Thus, according to this principle, XPS makes use of high energy X-ray photons to induce the photoemission of the core electrons who escape with a kinetic energy that is specific to the emitting chemical element.

Additional advantages

In addition to surface analyses, it is also used for the fine characterization of heterogeneous samples where the composition changes along with the depth. Thus, in combination with sputtering guns, the technique is used to perform depth profiles elemental analyses.

Moreover, the core energy is slightly distorted by the chemical environment what is used in an advantageous way to determine the oxidation estate of the element by fitting procedures. This is illustrated in the next figure, which shows the technique resolve the presence of metallic nickel and (Ni0) and nickel oxide (NiO) and distinguishes between arsenic oxide and gallium arsenide.

Alter Technology compromises 

During the last decade, Alter technology has established a solid collaborating network with reputed research institutions and technological centers. This grant Alter access to different XPS instruments and specifically conceived for different applications: conventional XPS, depth profiles analyses. angle-resolved XPS, UPS, and others.

Related

Recent Posts

Standard vs Planar LLC transformers Comparison for Battery Chargers

13.3.2026
5

How Modern Tools Model Magnetic Components for Power Electronics

5.3.2026
46

Advanced Loss Modeling for Planar Magnetics in the Frenetic Planar Tool

4.3.2026
39

Mastering Galvanic Isolation in Power Electronics: Methods, Standards, and Implementation

2.3.2026
65

Earthing Systems and IEC Classification Explained

26.2.2026
140

2026 Power Magnetics Design Trends: Flyback, DAB and Planar

13.2.2026
118

Mechanical Drift Indicator of Tantalum Capacitor Anodes Degradation under Reverse Bias

23.2.2026
70

Enabling Software‑Defined Vehicle Architectures: Automotive Ethernet and Zonal Smart Power

2.2.2026
70

Calculating Resistance Value of a Flyback RC Snubber 

2.2.2026
126

Upcoming Events

Mar 19
13:00 - 14:00 CDT

Smart Consideration of Inductor Thermal Performance

Mar 21
All day

PSMA Capacitor Workshop 2026

Apr 21
16:00 - 17:00 CEST

Heatsink Solutions: Thermal Management in electronic devices

View Calendar

Popular Posts

  • Buck Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Boost Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Flyback Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • LLC Resonant Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • MLCC Manufacturers Consider Price Increase as AI Demand Outpaces Supply

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Dual Active Bridge (DAB) Topology

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Ripple Current and its Effects on the Performance of Capacitors

    3 shares
    Share 3 Tweet 0
  • MLCC and Ceramic Capacitors

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • MLCC Case Sizes Standards Explained

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • 3-Phase EMI Filter Design, Simulation, Calculation and Test

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Newsletter Subscription

 

Passive Components Blog

© EPCI - Leading Passive Components Educational and Information Site

  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • EPCI Membership & Advertisement
  • About

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Knowledge Blog
  • PCNS

© EPCI - Leading Passive Components Educational and Information Site

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.
Go to mobile version