Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • NewsFilter
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest

    Binder Hybrid Connector Simplifies One Cable Automation

    Tapped Inductor Buck Converter Fundamentals

    TAIYO YUDEN Releases Mini Metal Power Inductors

    Molecular Memristor Shows Record 145 kH Emergent Inductance

    Planar vs Conventional Transformer: When it Make Sense

    Researchers Propose Next‑Gen Compact Memory Using Ultra-thin Ferroelectric Capacitors

    Nichicon ADN Automotive Hybrid Aluminum Capacitors Now Available in EMEA

    Wk 19 Electronics Supply Chain Digest

    Electrocaloric Multilayer Capacitors: Towards Quiet, Solid‑State Cooling Around Room Temperature

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • VideoFilter
    • All
    • Antenna videos
    • Capacitor videos
    • Circuit Protection Video
    • Filter videos
    • Fuse videos
    • Inductor videos
    • Inter-Connect Video
    • Non-linear passives videos
    • Oscillator videos
    • Passive sensors videos
    • Resistor videos

    Tapped Inductor Buck Converter Fundamentals

    Planar vs Conventional Transformer: When it Make Sense

    Modeling Fringing Field Losses in Inductors & Transformers

    Why Power Inductors Use a Ferrite Core With an Air Gap

    Transformer-Based Power-Line Harvester Magnetic Design

    Thermal Modeling of Magnetics

    Standard vs Planar LLC transformers Comparison for Battery Chargers

    How Modern Tools Model Magnetic Components for Power Electronics

    Advanced Loss Modeling for Planar Magnetics in the Frenetic Planar Tool

    Trending Tags

    • Capacitors explained
    • Inductors explained
    • Resistors explained
    • Filters explained
    • Application Video Guidelines
    • EMC
    • New Products
    • Ripple Current
    • Simulation
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
  • Knowledge Blog
  • DossiersNew
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • PCNS
    • PCNS 2025
    • PCNS 2023
    • PCNS 2021
    • PCNS 2019
    • PCNS 2017
  • Events
  • Home
  • NewsFilter
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest

    Binder Hybrid Connector Simplifies One Cable Automation

    Tapped Inductor Buck Converter Fundamentals

    TAIYO YUDEN Releases Mini Metal Power Inductors

    Molecular Memristor Shows Record 145 kH Emergent Inductance

    Planar vs Conventional Transformer: When it Make Sense

    Researchers Propose Next‑Gen Compact Memory Using Ultra-thin Ferroelectric Capacitors

    Nichicon ADN Automotive Hybrid Aluminum Capacitors Now Available in EMEA

    Wk 19 Electronics Supply Chain Digest

    Electrocaloric Multilayer Capacitors: Towards Quiet, Solid‑State Cooling Around Room Temperature

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • VideoFilter
    • All
    • Antenna videos
    • Capacitor videos
    • Circuit Protection Video
    • Filter videos
    • Fuse videos
    • Inductor videos
    • Inter-Connect Video
    • Non-linear passives videos
    • Oscillator videos
    • Passive sensors videos
    • Resistor videos

    Tapped Inductor Buck Converter Fundamentals

    Planar vs Conventional Transformer: When it Make Sense

    Modeling Fringing Field Losses in Inductors & Transformers

    Why Power Inductors Use a Ferrite Core With an Air Gap

    Transformer-Based Power-Line Harvester Magnetic Design

    Thermal Modeling of Magnetics

    Standard vs Planar LLC transformers Comparison for Battery Chargers

    How Modern Tools Model Magnetic Components for Power Electronics

    Advanced Loss Modeling for Planar Magnetics in the Frenetic Planar Tool

    Trending Tags

    • Capacitors explained
    • Inductors explained
    • Resistors explained
    • Filters explained
    • Application Video Guidelines
    • EMC
    • New Products
    • Ripple Current
    • Simulation
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
  • Knowledge Blog
  • DossiersNew
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • PCNS
    • PCNS 2025
    • PCNS 2023
    • PCNS 2021
    • PCNS 2019
    • PCNS 2017
  • Events
No Result
View All Result
Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result

Researchers Presented Lignin-based Electrolyte for 4V Supercapacitors with Low Self‑Discharge

19.3.2026
Reading Time: 7 mins read
A A
Schematic illustration of the electric double layer of porous carbon electrodes at elevated potentials in a a conventional electrolyte and b a weakly solvating electrolyte; source: authors

Schematic illustration of the electric double layer of porous carbon electrodes at elevated potentials in a a conventional electrolyte and b a weakly solvating electrolyte; source: authors

Researchers from Nanjing University in China published an article about upgrade of EDLC supercapacitors by a lignin-derived hierarchical porous carbon and a Li⁺ weakly solvating electrolyte to achieve 4.0 V operation with high energy density and strongly suppressed self-discharge.

Introduction

Electrochemical double-layer supercapacitors (EDLCs) combine high power density and long cycle life but remain constrained by low energy density and pronounced self-discharge, which limits their use in energy-intensive applications such as electric vehicles and grid storage. Because the stored energy scales with the square of the cell voltage, extending the operating window from the commercial standard of about 2.7 V to around 4.0 V is an attractive route to boost energy density, but conventional aqueous and organic electrolytes tend to decompose at such elevated voltages.

RelatedPosts

Binder Hybrid Connector Simplifies One Cable Automation

Tapped Inductor Buck Converter Fundamentals

TAIYO YUDEN Releases Mini Metal Power Inductors

Previous strategies to reach higher voltages, including ionic liquid electrolytes and high-concentration electrolytes, improve electrochemical stability but suffer from high viscosity, sluggish ion transport, higher cost, and aggravated parasitic reactions that accelerate self-discharge. In parallel, lignin-derived porous carbons have emerged as sustainable EDLC electrodes, but effective high-voltage operation requires precise matching between pore structure, ion solvation, and electrolyte chemistry. This article addresses these coupled limitations through a co-design of a lignin-derived hierarchical porous carbon (HPC) electrode and a Li⁺-based weakly solvating electrolyte formulated with sulfolane (SUL) and a fluorinated ether diluent.

Key points

  • Demonstration of a lignin-derived hierarchical porous carbon (HPC) with high surface area (≈2844 m² g⁻¹) and dominant sub-nanometer pores (~0.8 nm), tailored for solvated Li⁺ and BF₄⁻ ions.
  • Formulation of a LiBF₄-based weakly solvating electrolyte using sulfolane (SUL) and a non-coordinating fluorinated ether diluent (TTE) to combine high oxidative stability with reduced viscosity and fast ion transport.
  • Achieved specific capacitance of 139 F g⁻¹ at 4.0 V in symmetric HPC-based EDLCs with excellent rate performance (92 F g⁻¹ at 10 A g⁻¹).
  • Realized a maximum energy density of 77.4 Wh kg⁻¹, exceeding typical carbon-based symmetric supercapacitors (≈25–35 Wh kg⁻¹), while operating stably at 4.0 V.
  • Demonstrated robust cycling stability with over 90% capacitance retention after 10,000 charge–discharge cycles at 10 A g⁻¹ and near-unity Coulombic efficiency.
  • Quantitatively analyzed self-discharge via open-circuit voltage decay and leakage current, showing that the weakly solvating electrolyte markedly suppresses both potential-driven ion redistribution and activation-controlled parasitic reactions.
  • XPS and LSV measurements confirmed reduced electrolyte decomposition and the formation of a more stable electrode–electrolyte interface in the weakly solvating electrolyte compared to conventional TEABF₄/PC systems.
  • Validated that geometric matching between sub-nanometer pores and solvated Li⁺ dimensions is essential for maximizing charge storage, outperforming both under-activated and over-activated carbons as well as commercial YP-50F.

Extended summary

The work targets two fundamental bottlenecks of EDLCs: low energy density and severe self-discharge at elevated voltages. Conventional aqueous electrolytes are limited to about 1.2 V by water decomposition, while widely used organic electrolytes based on TEABF₄ in acetonitrile or propylene carbonate start to degrade beyond about 2.7 V, leading to electrolyte breakdown and rapid self-discharge. Approaches relying on ionic liquids or high-concentration electrolytes can extend the voltage window but introduce excessive viscosity, increased cost, and more intense parasitic reactions at the carbon surface. In parallel, literature has shown that the capacitance of EDLCs is highly sensitive to the size compatibility between solvated ions and the carbon pore network, especially for nanoporous carbons. Building on this, the authors propose a synergistic strategy combining a pore-size-engineered lignin-derived carbon with a weakly solvating Li⁺ electrolyte to simultaneously improve voltage stability, energy density, and self-discharge behavior.

The electrode material is obtained from industrial lignin using a KOH activation–pyrolysis route in a tube furnace under nitrogen. Lignin is mixed with KOH at a mass ratio of 1:2, heated first to 250 °C, then to 800 °C, and subsequently washed with water and HCl to remove inorganic residues, yielding a highly porous carbon denoted HPC. XRD shows broad (002) and (110) reflections characteristic of disordered carbon, while Raman spectroscopy exhibits an ID/IG ratio of 0.97, indicating a highly defective, non-graphitic structure. Nitrogen adsorption–desorption measurements give a very high specific surface area of 2844 m² g⁻¹ and a combined Type I/IV isotherm, implying abundant micropores and mesopores. Pore size analysis reveals a dominant peak around 0.8 nm, which is close to the solvated size of Li⁺ in sulfolane (~0.8 nm) and BF₄⁻ (~0.6 nm), enabling efficient ion confinement. Scanning electron microscopy reveals a three-dimensional, interconnected porous network that contrasts with the dense morphology of commercial YP-50F carbon, and EDS/XPS confirm uniformly distributed carbon and oxygen with surface C–O and C=O functionalities that enhance wettability.

To probe the role of activation, two additional carbons are prepared with KOH:lignin ratios of 1:1 (HPCinsu) and 3:1 (HPCexce). HPCinsu exhibits smaller micropores (~0.6 nm) that are too tight for solvated Li⁺, while HPCexce shows a broad 1–8 nm pore distribution with reduced sub-nanometer fraction. When tested in Li⁺-based electrolytes, HPC delivers a specific capacitance of 133 F g⁻¹ at 2.7 V, outperforming HPCinsu and HPCexce as well as commercial YP-50F (≈90 F g⁻¹), which is attributed to the optimal pore–ion size matching. In contrast, TEA⁺ cations with a solvated size of 1.3–1.4 nm show poor utilization of the 0.8 nm pores, resulting in shorter discharge times and lower capacitance, highlighting the importance of ion–pore compatibility.

On the electrolyte side, the authors first investigate LiBF₄ in sulfolane at varying concentrations to extend the voltage window. Increasing the LiBF₄ concentration enhances electrochemical stability via a high-concentration electrolyte effect, but at the cost of higher viscosity and reduced capacitance. Cyclic voltammetry and galvanostatic charge–discharge reveal that 4 M LiBF₄/SUL gives the best trade-off, with a specific capacitance of 97.5 F g⁻¹ and Coulombic efficiency of 94%; higher concentrations further reduce capacitance, whereas lower concentrations exacerbate electrolyte decomposition and lower Coulombic efficiency. To circumvent the viscosity issue, the electrolyte is transformed into a weakly solvating system by adding 1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl-2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropyl ether (TTE) as a non-coordinating diluent. TTE is miscible with sulfolane but does not bind Li⁺, thereby preserving local Li⁺–SUL clusters while diluting the bulk and lowering viscosity.

The optimized weakly solvating electrolyte consists of 4 M LiBF₄ in SUL mixed with TTE at SUL:TTE = 1:2 by volume. In this medium, the HPC electrodes exhibit nearly rectangular CV curves up to 4.0 V, longer discharge times, and lower charge-transfer resistance, indicating more ideal capacitive behavior and faster ion kinetics. Galvanostatic data show a maximum specific capacitance of 139 F g⁻¹, with 92 F g⁻¹ retained even at 10 A g⁻¹, confirming excellent rate capability. Long-term cycling at 10 A g⁻¹ over 10,000 cycles reveals capacitance retention above 90% and almost unity Coulombic efficiency, demonstrating that the co-designed electrode–electrolyte system is stable under high-voltage, high-rate conditions. The Ragone plot places this device at an energy density of 77.4 Wh kg⁻¹, more than double that of typical symmetric carbon supercapacitors and among the best reported carbon-based systems.

Self-discharge behavior is analyzed in detail because it is a critical limiting factor for practical deployment. The authors distinguish two main regimes: an initial fast voltage drop driven by potential-driven ion redistribution within the porous network, and a slower long-term decay governed by parasitic Faradaic reactions. Open-circuit voltage decay measurements after charging to 4.0 V show that the weakly solvating electrolyte exhibits the slowest initial voltage drop, suggesting that it forms a more ordered Helmholtz layer that resists ion redistribution. To quantify the contributions of different processes, the OCV curves are fitted with a model that decomposes the decay into an initial Ohmic drop, diffusion-controlled Faradaic reactions (DCFR), and activation-controlled Faradaic reactions (ACFR). The fitted parameters indicate a markedly reduced ACFR component in the weakly solvating electrolyte compared to both 1 M LiBF₄/SUL and 4 M LiBF₄/SUL, pointing to effectively suppressed slow parasitic reactions at high voltage.

Leakage current measurements provide complementary evidence: cells with the weakly solvating electrolyte show the lowest steady-state leakage current at both 2.7 and 4.0 V, confirming reduced continuous charge loss. XPS analysis of HPC electrodes after 10,000 cycles in different electrolytes further elucidates the interfacial chemistry. Electrodes cycled in conventional 1 M TEABF₄/PC display a strong C–F signal and increased C=O content in the C 1s spectrum, indicative of substantial electrolyte decomposition and the formation of fluorinated surface species. In contrast, electrodes cycled in 4 M LiBF₄/SUL:TTE retain their original C–O and C=O features without detectable C–F peaks, demonstrating that the weakly solvating electrolyte preserves the carbon surface and limits parasitic reactions. Linear sweep voltammetry corroborates these findings, showing that TEABF₄/PC begins to oxidize above about 2.5 V, while the TTE-containing electrolyte remains stable up to around 4.2 V.

Overall, the study shows that combining a lignin-derived HPC with sub-nanometer pores and a carefully formulated weakly solvating Li⁺ electrolyte yields a device with high capacitance, extended 4.0 V operation, high energy density, and strongly suppressed self-discharge. The key mechanisms are geometric matching between pore size and solvated ion size, which maximizes double-layer charge storage, and a weakly solvating, fluorinated diluent environment that reduces viscosity, accelerates ion transport, and stabilizes the electrode–electrolyte interface against oxidative degradation.

Conclusion

This work demonstrates a sustainable, high-performance EDLC concept by co-designing a lignin-derived hierarchical porous carbon and a LiBF₄/SUL–TTE weakly solvating electrolyte to overcome the intrinsic voltage and self-discharge limitations of conventional supercapacitors. The resulting symmetric devices combine high specific capacitance, an unprecedented 4.0 V operating window, energy density of 77.4 Wh kg⁻¹, and excellent cycling stability with strongly reduced self-discharge and leakage.

The main limitations include the need for controlled synthesis of the HPC to finely tune pore size distribution and the use of a relatively specialized fluorinated ether diluent whose large-scale cost and environmental footprint will require further assessment. Future work could explore scaling the lignin-based carbon synthesis, optimizing electrolyte composition for other cations or solvents, integrating this design into larger-format devices, and extending the weakly solvating electrolyte strategy to hybrid or pseudocapacitive systems.

References

  1. Shichao Zhang, Shenglin Liu, Suyang Si, Keqi Zeng, Chenxin Cai, Xiangzhou Yuan, Yawen Tang, Feng Gong, Hualin Ye, “Lignin-derived hierarchical porous carbons enabling high-voltage electrochemical capacitors with low self-discharge,” Carbon Research, Volume 5, Article 11, 2026.

Related

Recent Posts

Tapped Inductor Buck Converter Fundamentals

13.5.2026
11

Molecular Memristor Shows Record 145 kH Emergent Inductance

12.5.2026
11

Planar vs Conventional Transformer: When it Make Sense

11.5.2026
35

Researchers Propose Next‑Gen Compact Memory Using Ultra-thin Ferroelectric Capacitors

11.5.2026
28

Nichicon ADN Automotive Hybrid Aluminum Capacitors Now Available in EMEA

11.5.2026
23

Electrocaloric Multilayer Capacitors: Towards Quiet, Solid‑State Cooling Around Room Temperature

7.5.2026
186

High-Crystallinity Nanocrystalline Composites for MHz Chip Inductors

7.5.2026
63

KYOCERA 10 µF 0201 MLCC Brings High‑Capacitance into Mobile Designs

6.5.2026
54

Energy Localization in Tantalum Anode Formation: A Structural Perspective

4.5.2026
46

Upcoming Events

May 19
16:00 - 17:00 CEST

Designing Qi2 Wireless Power Systems: Practical Development and EMC Optimization

Jun 2
16:00 - 17:00 CEST

Calculation, Simulation and Measurement of 800V EMC Filters

Jun 16
16:00 - 17:00 CEST

EMC with EMC – EMC‑compliant design with electromechanical connectors

View Calendar

Popular Posts

  • Buck Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Boost Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Flyback Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • LLC Resonant Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • MLCC and Ceramic Capacitors

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Dual Active Bridge (DAB) Topology

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Capacitor Charging and Discharging

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • What Electronics Engineer Needs to Know About Passive Low Pass Filters

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Ripple Current and its Effects on the Performance of Capacitors

    3 shares
    Share 3 Tweet 0
  • MLCC Case Sizes Standards Explained

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Newsletter Subscription

 

Passive Components Blog

© EPCI - Leading Passive Components Educational and Information Site

  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • EPCI Membership & Advertisement
  • About

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Knowledge Blog
  • PCNS

© EPCI - Leading Passive Components Educational and Information Site

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.
Go to mobile version