Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • NewsFilter
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest

    Samsung Introduces 35V MLCCs Flying Capacitors for USB PD Fast Charging

    New J‑STD‑075B Standard Elevates Process Sensitivity Classification for Passive and Solid-State Components

    Modelithics Expands COMPLETE+3D Library for Ansys HFSS

    DigiKey Launches “Engineering Unlocked” Video Series

    Equivalent Circuit Constants of Crystal Units Explained

    Vishay Releases Compact High‑Accuracy Hall Effect Linear Position Sensor

    Nanocrystalline Cores for Low‑Loss MHz Chip Inductors

    Exxelia Miniaturized 400 MHz Inverted‑F Antenna

    Würth Elektronik Unveils High-Current Automotive Power Inductor

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • VideoFilter
    • All
    • Antenna videos
    • Capacitor videos
    • Circuit Protection Video
    • Filter videos
    • Fuse videos
    • Inductor videos
    • Inter-Connect Video
    • Non-linear passives videos
    • Oscillator videos
    • Passive sensors videos
    • Resistor videos

    Transformer-Based Power-Line Harvester Magnetic Design

    Thermal Modeling of Magnetics

    Standard vs Planar LLC transformers Comparison for Battery Chargers

    How Modern Tools Model Magnetic Components for Power Electronics

    Advanced Loss Modeling for Planar Magnetics in the Frenetic Planar Tool

    2026 Power Magnetics Design Trends: Flyback, DAB and Planar

    Enabling Software‑Defined Vehicle Architectures: Automotive Ethernet and Zonal Smart Power

    Calculating Resistance Value of a Flyback RC Snubber 

    One‑Pulse Characterization of Nonlinear Power Inductors

    Trending Tags

    • Capacitors explained
    • Inductors explained
    • Resistors explained
    • Filters explained
    • Application Video Guidelines
    • EMC
    • New Products
    • Ripple Current
    • Simulation
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
  • Knowledge Blog
  • DossiersNew
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • PCNS
    • PCNS 2025
    • PCNS 2023
    • PCNS 2021
    • PCNS 2019
    • PCNS 2017
  • Events
  • Home
  • NewsFilter
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest

    Samsung Introduces 35V MLCCs Flying Capacitors for USB PD Fast Charging

    New J‑STD‑075B Standard Elevates Process Sensitivity Classification for Passive and Solid-State Components

    Modelithics Expands COMPLETE+3D Library for Ansys HFSS

    DigiKey Launches “Engineering Unlocked” Video Series

    Equivalent Circuit Constants of Crystal Units Explained

    Vishay Releases Compact High‑Accuracy Hall Effect Linear Position Sensor

    Nanocrystalline Cores for Low‑Loss MHz Chip Inductors

    Exxelia Miniaturized 400 MHz Inverted‑F Antenna

    Würth Elektronik Unveils High-Current Automotive Power Inductor

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • VideoFilter
    • All
    • Antenna videos
    • Capacitor videos
    • Circuit Protection Video
    • Filter videos
    • Fuse videos
    • Inductor videos
    • Inter-Connect Video
    • Non-linear passives videos
    • Oscillator videos
    • Passive sensors videos
    • Resistor videos

    Transformer-Based Power-Line Harvester Magnetic Design

    Thermal Modeling of Magnetics

    Standard vs Planar LLC transformers Comparison for Battery Chargers

    How Modern Tools Model Magnetic Components for Power Electronics

    Advanced Loss Modeling for Planar Magnetics in the Frenetic Planar Tool

    2026 Power Magnetics Design Trends: Flyback, DAB and Planar

    Enabling Software‑Defined Vehicle Architectures: Automotive Ethernet and Zonal Smart Power

    Calculating Resistance Value of a Flyback RC Snubber 

    One‑Pulse Characterization of Nonlinear Power Inductors

    Trending Tags

    • Capacitors explained
    • Inductors explained
    • Resistors explained
    • Filters explained
    • Application Video Guidelines
    • EMC
    • New Products
    • Ripple Current
    • Simulation
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
  • Knowledge Blog
  • DossiersNew
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • PCNS
    • PCNS 2025
    • PCNS 2023
    • PCNS 2021
    • PCNS 2019
    • PCNS 2017
  • Events
No Result
View All Result
Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result

3D-printed Magnetic Material from Non-Magnetic Powder

14.1.2022
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
The magnetic properties of the metal rod continuously change from para- to ferromagnetic and back due to the shift in the relative proportions of the two constituent materials: marine-grade stainless steel (labeled 316L) and aluminum bronze (Al-Bronze). Credit: Oleg Dubinin et al./The Journal of Materials Processing Technology

The magnetic properties of the metal rod continuously change from para- to ferromagnetic and back due to the shift in the relative proportions of the two constituent materials: marine-grade stainless steel (labeled 316L) and aluminum bronze (Al-Bronze). Credit: Oleg Dubinin et al./The Journal of Materials Processing Technology

Scientists from Skoltech and their colleagues have used a 3D printer to fuse two materials in an alloy whose composition continuously changes from one region of the sample to the other, endowing the alloy with gradient magnetic properties. Despite the nonmagnetic nature of the constituent materials, the alloy exhibits magnetic properties. Published in The Journal of Materials Processing Technology, the study also offers a theoretical explanation for the phenomenon.

Once perceived as a mere novelty tool for rapid prototyping, 3D printing has grown into a full-blown industrial technology used to produce airplane parts, patient-matched implants and prosthetics, jewelry, and custom-fit shoes, among other things.

RelatedPosts

Electroninks Releases Gold and Platinum Particle-Free Conductive Inks

Peak Nano Installs Production Line for Innovative Capacitor Films

Electrical Properties Study of SMD Resistor Integrated Metallic Yarn for Smart Textiles

The main advantage of 3D printing is the ability to produce objects with very complex shapes that are impossible or too expensive to make with conventional manufacturing techniques, such as casting, rolling, and stamping. The technology also enables faster and riskier prototyping, and greater flexibility in terms of product customization and how many items are produced. And then there’s the added benefit of reduced waste.

One of the limitations of 3D printing is that it tends to use one homogeneous material or mixture throughout the entire item produced. By varying the composition from one part of the item to another, it could be endowed with properties that continuously change.

Image. The 3D printer used in the study. Credit: Oleg Dubinin et al./The Journal of Materials Processing Technology

An example of this would be a rod made of an alloy of two metals whose ratio changes from 100% metal A to fifty-fifty, to 100% metal B, and so on. Provided that the metals in question mix well, without giving rise to defects, the rod’s gradient properties — including magnetic ones — could be technologically useful, for example, for motor rotors, strips for magnetic encoders, or transformators.

The authors of a recent Skoltech-led study published in The Journal of Materials Processing Technology report an experiment where they produced such an alloy. Its two components — the metals A and B above — are themselves alloys: aluminum bronze (copper, aluminum, and iron) and marine-grade stainless steel (mostly iron, chromium, and nickel). Both are technically known as paramagnetic, or “nonmagnetic” in layman’s terms. That is, they don’t stick to a magnet. Yet when they are mixed in equal proportions, the resulting alloy turns out to be a “soft” ferromagnet. That is, it is attracted to “hard” ferromagnets — like the one on the fridge — but does not itself become one.

“We used these two paramagnetic materials to create a gradient alloy with an InssTek MX-1000 3D printer. It employs a technique called directed energy deposition, which involves depositing powdered material from a nozzle and simultaneously melting it with a laser. The resulting alloy exhibited ferromagnetic properties to an extent that depended on the ratio between the two constituent materials,” said the study’s lead author Oleg Dubinin from the Additive Manufacturing Lab at Skoltech.

“Our study also provides a theoretical explanation of the emergence of ferromagnetic properties in the alloy in terms of its atomic structure,” the researcher went on. “While the two initial materials have a so-called face-centered cubic crystal structure, their combination results in a body-centered cubic structure.”

In the former, metal atoms sit in the corners of imaginary cubes and on their faces. In the latter, there are metal atoms at the centers of the invisible cubes instead of on their faces. This second arrangement gives the material its ferromagnetic properties.

“Gradient soft magnetic alloys could find applications in machine engineering, for example, in electrical motors,” commented PI Stanislav Evlashin, a leading research scientist at Skoltech. “Our findings show that directed energy deposition is not just a way to 3D-print gradient materials, but also a way to discover new alloys. Besides that, the technology is highly efficient and suitable for manufacturing even large-size parts quickly.”

Related

Source: Skoltech

Recent Posts

New J‑STD‑075B Standard Elevates Process Sensitivity Classification for Passive and Solid-State Components

27.3.2026
10

Modelithics Expands COMPLETE+3D Library for Ansys HFSS

27.3.2026
4

Nanocrystalline Cores for Low‑Loss MHz Chip Inductors

25.3.2026
28

Würth Elektronik Unveils High-Current Automotive Power Inductor

24.3.2026
23

Transformer-Based Power-Line Harvester Magnetic Design

24.3.2026
14

Middle East Conflict: The Potential Impact to Passive Components

23.3.2026
122

LLC Transformer: Designing a 2 kW LLC Transformer with Integrated Resonant Inductor

26.3.2026
72

Inductor Technology Dossier

19.3.2026
49

Coilcraft Releases TLVR Inductors for High Density VRMs and PoL Converters

19.3.2026
47

Upcoming Events

Apr 21
16:00 - 17:00 CEST

Heatsink Solutions: Thermal Management in electronic devices

May 5
16:00 - 17:00 CEST

Understanding and Selecting Capacitors – Fundamentals, Technologies and Latest Trends

May 19
16:00 - 17:00 CEST

Designing Qi2 Wireless Power Systems: Practical Development and EMC Optimization

View Calendar

Popular Posts

  • Buck Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Boost Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Flyback Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • LLC Resonant Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Dual Active Bridge (DAB) Topology

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • MLCC and Ceramic Capacitors

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Ripple Current and its Effects on the Performance of Capacitors

    3 shares
    Share 3 Tweet 0
  • MLCC Case Sizes Standards Explained

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Capacitor Charging and Discharging

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • What is a Dielectric Constant and DF of Plastic Materials?

    4 shares
    Share 4 Tweet 0

Newsletter Subscription

 

Passive Components Blog

© EPCI - Leading Passive Components Educational and Information Site

  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • EPCI Membership & Advertisement
  • About

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Knowledge Blog
  • PCNS

© EPCI - Leading Passive Components Educational and Information Site

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.
Go to mobile version