Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • NewsFilter
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest

    Two‑capacitor paradox explained for engineers

    YAGEO Releases Compact RJ45 Connector for Multi‑Gigabit Ethernet

    Circuit Protection Technology Annual Dossier

    ESA SPCD 26 Registration Open

    Capacitances of Nonlinear MLCCs: What Datasheets Don’t Tell You

    Stackpole Releases Automotive Wide‑Termination Resistors

    How a Digital Structural Twin Can Predict Tantalum Capacitor Reliability

    SCHURTER Buys Biaodi to Boost High-Voltage Protection Portfolio

    Binder Hybrid Connector Simplifies One Cable Automation

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • VideoFilter
    • All
    • Antenna videos
    • Capacitor videos
    • Circuit Protection Video
    • Filter videos
    • Fuse videos
    • Inductor videos
    • Inter-Connect Video
    • Non-linear passives videos
    • Oscillator videos
    • Passive sensors videos
    • Resistor videos

    Two‑capacitor paradox explained for engineers

    Capacitances of Nonlinear MLCCs: What Datasheets Don’t Tell You

    Tapped Inductor Buck Converter Fundamentals

    Planar vs Conventional Transformer: When it Make Sense

    Modeling Fringing Field Losses in Inductors & Transformers

    Why Power Inductors Use a Ferrite Core With an Air Gap

    Transformer-Based Power-Line Harvester Magnetic Design

    Thermal Modeling of Magnetics

    Standard vs Planar LLC transformers Comparison for Battery Chargers

    Trending Tags

    • Capacitors explained
    • Inductors explained
    • Resistors explained
    • Filters explained
    • Application Video Guidelines
    • EMC
    • New Products
    • Ripple Current
    • Simulation
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
  • Knowledge Blog
  • DossiersNew
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • PCNS
    • PCNS 2025
    • PCNS 2023
    • PCNS 2021
    • PCNS 2019
    • PCNS 2017
  • Events
  • Home
  • NewsFilter
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest

    Two‑capacitor paradox explained for engineers

    YAGEO Releases Compact RJ45 Connector for Multi‑Gigabit Ethernet

    Circuit Protection Technology Annual Dossier

    ESA SPCD 26 Registration Open

    Capacitances of Nonlinear MLCCs: What Datasheets Don’t Tell You

    Stackpole Releases Automotive Wide‑Termination Resistors

    How a Digital Structural Twin Can Predict Tantalum Capacitor Reliability

    SCHURTER Buys Biaodi to Boost High-Voltage Protection Portfolio

    Binder Hybrid Connector Simplifies One Cable Automation

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • VideoFilter
    • All
    • Antenna videos
    • Capacitor videos
    • Circuit Protection Video
    • Filter videos
    • Fuse videos
    • Inductor videos
    • Inter-Connect Video
    • Non-linear passives videos
    • Oscillator videos
    • Passive sensors videos
    • Resistor videos

    Two‑capacitor paradox explained for engineers

    Capacitances of Nonlinear MLCCs: What Datasheets Don’t Tell You

    Tapped Inductor Buck Converter Fundamentals

    Planar vs Conventional Transformer: When it Make Sense

    Modeling Fringing Field Losses in Inductors & Transformers

    Why Power Inductors Use a Ferrite Core With an Air Gap

    Transformer-Based Power-Line Harvester Magnetic Design

    Thermal Modeling of Magnetics

    Standard vs Planar LLC transformers Comparison for Battery Chargers

    Trending Tags

    • Capacitors explained
    • Inductors explained
    • Resistors explained
    • Filters explained
    • Application Video Guidelines
    • EMC
    • New Products
    • Ripple Current
    • Simulation
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
  • Knowledge Blog
  • DossiersNew
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • PCNS
    • PCNS 2025
    • PCNS 2023
    • PCNS 2021
    • PCNS 2019
    • PCNS 2017
  • Events
No Result
View All Result
Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result

Buck Regulators – Smaller, More Efficient DC-DC Converter Designs

24.8.2022
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A

DC-DC converters are fundamental building blocks used in electronics power management circuits. They convert one direct current (DC) voltage to another DC that is either a greater (step-up, boost) or lower (step-down, buck) voltage. Paul Golata, senior technology specialist at Mouser Electronics describes in his article published by TTI MarketEYE benefits of buck regulators as small, more efficient DC-DC converter designs.

Every part of an electronic design is like taking various building blocks and making them work together in harmony to accomplish the design goal. Electronic design engineers are always searching for further miniaturization of parts, increased functionality and higher reliability.

RelatedPosts

Two‑capacitor paradox explained for engineers

YAGEO Releases Compact RJ45 Connector for Multi‑Gigabit Ethernet

Circuit Protection Technology Annual Dossier

Today’s leading suppliers offer buck regulators with smaller footprints and as much as a one-third reduction in height, with significant improvements in power efficiency, transient performance, and electromagnetic interference (EMI).

MOSFETs (metal-oxide semiconductor field-effect transistors) are commonly employed as electronic switches. Buck regulators often utilize internal power FETs. As part of the effort to simplify buck regulators and reduce their size, especially for output currents of less than 20A, many parts are offered with a controller and integrated FETs within one package.

A controller with an integrated FET can compromise efficiency because, in specifying for a wide range of applications, these FETs’ voltage ratings can be much higher than those needed for a given application, resulting in increased switching losses. In addition, the dimensioning of the FETs will almost certainly be sub-optimal for a specific duty cycle – a significant compromise, especially in low-duty cycle applications.

Packaging technology is deployed to reduce the size and squeeze every possible milliohm of parasitic losses from the powertrain to glean efficiency improvements. Integration of complete powertrains—control plus FETs, output inductor, and input/output filters—is impeded primarily by the physically large inductors that are still required.

Updates to power architecture from leading suppliers resolve many of these issues, allowing for switching frequencies that remain in the 1MHz to 2MHz range while reducing the amount of inductance required – and also improving overall power conversion efficiency.

The current source used in this style of component is, in effect, an inductor in a buck stage – a close approximation to a current source, used to absorb all of the charge redistribution losses typically made in the switch. Because this current source inductor can be in the output stage, the energy, rather than being lost, can be recycled as useful energy to the load.

In this manner, the recycled energy allows the series resistance of the charge pump switch (and associated parasitic impedances) to be as small as possible due to the fact that inrush current is no longer an issue. This also minimizes the charge redistribution losses in this part of the circuit. In terms of efficiency, a charge pump with this design is 97 percent to 99 percent more efficient.

The charge pump itself is also two-phased and interleaved, and presents to the input an almost 100 percent duty cycle. When contrasted with a traditional buck regulator, where the duty cycle might be only 10 percent, this makes a massive difference to the input current ripple and the amount of input filtering needed.

This approach to architecture also breaks down the whole voltage transition into many small voltage steps, executed across multiple input and output phases. Compared to single-stage buck designs, the net result is a much lower EMI signature for this architecture, for both conducted and radiated EMI. A major source of EMI in single-stage bucks is the inductor (V(t) = L * (di/dt)).

This type of DC/DC converter module is well-suited for use in PCIe/server applications, field-programmable gate array (FPGA), and digital signal processing (DSP), datacom/telecom systems, distributed bus architectures (DBA), programmable logic and mixed voltage systems. Select versions can also be used in I2C 6.0-compatible serial interfaces operating up to 1MHz.

This two-stage buck is an architectural innovation using standard off-the-shelf FETs in a very mature CMOS semiconductor process. Because the inductor is no longer the dominant component in the bill of materials, power conversion shrinks from occupying some 30 percent to 40 percent of a system’s circuit area to half of that, without compromising efficiency.

Furthermore, because the inductor usually is one of the tallest components in a system, this architecture allows for thinner solutions, improving packing density and enabling mobile devices to be slimmer.

Related article: How to Choose the Right Inductor for DC-DC Buck Applications

Related

Source: TTI MarketEYE

Recent Posts

Two‑capacitor paradox explained for engineers

18.5.2026
21

ESA SPCD 26 Registration Open

15.5.2026
21

Capacitances of Nonlinear MLCCs: What Datasheets Don’t Tell You

14.5.2026
76

How a Digital Structural Twin Can Predict Tantalum Capacitor Reliability

14.5.2026
50

Tapped Inductor Buck Converter Fundamentals

13.5.2026
37

TAIYO YUDEN Releases Mini Metal Power Inductors

13.5.2026
46

Molecular Memristor Shows Record 145 kH Emergent Inductance

12.5.2026
42

Planar vs Conventional Transformer: When it Make Sense

11.5.2026
72

High-Crystallinity Nanocrystalline Composites for MHz Chip Inductors

7.5.2026
69

Upcoming Events

May 19
16:00 - 17:00 CEST

Designing Qi2 Wireless Power Systems: Practical Development and EMC Optimization

Jun 2
16:00 - 17:00 CEST

Calculation, Simulation and Measurement of 800V EMC Filters

Jun 16
16:00 - 17:00 CEST

EMC with EMC – EMC‑compliant design with electromechanical connectors

View Calendar

Popular Posts

  • Buck Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Boost Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Flyback Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • LLC Resonant Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • MLCC and Ceramic Capacitors

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Capacitor Charging and Discharging

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • What Electronics Engineer Needs to Know About Passive Low Pass Filters

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Dual Active Bridge (DAB) Topology

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Ripple Current and its Effects on the Performance of Capacitors

    3 shares
    Share 3 Tweet 0
  • Samsung Electro-Mechanics Releases High-Capacitance MLCCs for AI Server Applications

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Newsletter Subscription

 

Passive Components Blog

© EPCI - Leading Passive Components Educational and Information Site

  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • EPCI Membership & Advertisement
  • About

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Knowledge Blog
  • PCNS

© EPCI - Leading Passive Components Educational and Information Site

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.
Go to mobile version