Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • NewsFilter
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest

    Power Electronics Tools for Passives and Magnetic Designs

    Modelithics Releases Component Model Library for SIMULIA CST Studio Suite

    Exxelia Publishes Micropen White Papers for Printed Electronics

    Stackpole Releases AlN High‑Power Thick Film Chip Resistors

    Samsung Q4 2025 Results: MLCC focus for AI, Server and Automotive

    Würth Elektronik Developed a Custom Transformer for Active Hand Orthosis

    Wk 4 Electronics Supply Chain Digest

    Capacitor Technology Dossier

    ROHM Extends 2012 Shunt Resistors Power Rating up to 1.25 W

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • VideoFilter
    • All
    • Antenna videos
    • Capacitor videos
    • Circuit Protection Video
    • Filter videos
    • Fuse videos
    • Inductor videos
    • Inter-Connect Video
    • Non-linear passives videos
    • Oscillator videos
    • Passive sensors videos
    • Resistor videos

    One‑Pulse Characterization of Nonlinear Power Inductors

    Thermistor Linearization Challenges

    Coaxial Connectors and How to Connect with PCB

    PCB Manufacturing, Test Methods, Quality and Reliability

    Transformer Behavior – Current Transfer and Hidden Feedback

    Choosing the Right Capacitor: The Importance of Accurate Measurements

    RF Inductors: Selection and Design Challenges for High-Frequency Circuits

    Transformer Safety IEC 61558 Standard

    3-Phase EMI Filter Design, Simulation, Calculation and Test

    Trending Tags

    • Capacitors explained
    • Inductors explained
    • Resistors explained
    • Filters explained
    • Application Video Guidelines
    • EMC
    • New Products
    • Ripple Current
    • Simulation
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
  • Knowledge Blog
  • DossiersNew
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • PCNS
    • PCNS 2025
    • PCNS 2023
    • PCNS 2021
    • PCNS 2019
    • PCNS 2017
  • Events
  • Home
  • NewsFilter
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest

    Power Electronics Tools for Passives and Magnetic Designs

    Modelithics Releases Component Model Library for SIMULIA CST Studio Suite

    Exxelia Publishes Micropen White Papers for Printed Electronics

    Stackpole Releases AlN High‑Power Thick Film Chip Resistors

    Samsung Q4 2025 Results: MLCC focus for AI, Server and Automotive

    Würth Elektronik Developed a Custom Transformer for Active Hand Orthosis

    Wk 4 Electronics Supply Chain Digest

    Capacitor Technology Dossier

    ROHM Extends 2012 Shunt Resistors Power Rating up to 1.25 W

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • VideoFilter
    • All
    • Antenna videos
    • Capacitor videos
    • Circuit Protection Video
    • Filter videos
    • Fuse videos
    • Inductor videos
    • Inter-Connect Video
    • Non-linear passives videos
    • Oscillator videos
    • Passive sensors videos
    • Resistor videos

    One‑Pulse Characterization of Nonlinear Power Inductors

    Thermistor Linearization Challenges

    Coaxial Connectors and How to Connect with PCB

    PCB Manufacturing, Test Methods, Quality and Reliability

    Transformer Behavior – Current Transfer and Hidden Feedback

    Choosing the Right Capacitor: The Importance of Accurate Measurements

    RF Inductors: Selection and Design Challenges for High-Frequency Circuits

    Transformer Safety IEC 61558 Standard

    3-Phase EMI Filter Design, Simulation, Calculation and Test

    Trending Tags

    • Capacitors explained
    • Inductors explained
    • Resistors explained
    • Filters explained
    • Application Video Guidelines
    • EMC
    • New Products
    • Ripple Current
    • Simulation
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
  • Knowledge Blog
  • DossiersNew
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • PCNS
    • PCNS 2025
    • PCNS 2023
    • PCNS 2021
    • PCNS 2019
    • PCNS 2017
  • Events
No Result
View All Result
Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result

IPC Class 2 vs Class 3 Solder Joints Requirements Explained

27.2.2025
Reading Time: 5 mins read
A A

In this post, inspired by the Samtec blog, we’ll briefly examine IPC-A-610 Class 2 and Class 3 J-lead and Gull Wing solder joints, along with their respective requirements.

In the manufacturing world there are standards for just about everything, and they all are typically there to ensure a product can perform as expected for the end application. Among these standards is IPC-A-610 covering solder joints for varying types of connector termination styles.

RelatedPosts

Coaxial Connectors and How to Connect with PCB

PCB Manufacturing, Test Methods, Quality and Reliability

Key Interconnect Technologies for 2025

What is IPC-A-610

IPC-A-610 delves into the concept of “Acceptability of Electronic Assemblies,” and for the purpose of this blog, we will specifically focus on the requirements for J-Lead and Gull Wing solder connections. Considering the diverse applications that necessitate varying requirements, IPC has established different classes, each specifying the aesthetic characteristics of solder joints that must conform to those class specifications.

Class 2 

J-Lead Components

IPC-A-610 Class 2 is the standard requirement for J-lead component termination soldering. Class 2 products need extended reliability, but it’s not a critical requirement. We’ll cover some of the requirements below, but not all of them.

Class 2 allows the manufacturer more room for imperfections in the assembly, such as a larger toe offset (1) and side overhang (2), and a thinner end joint width (3) as shown in Figures 1 and 2 below. For side overhang, Class 2 states that the component lead may overhang the side of the pad (2), a maximum of 50% the width of the lead.

The end joint width (3) is the width of the solder joint at the most narrow point and must be a minimum of 50% of the lead width (4).

Figure 1. solder joint toe offset
Figure 2. solder joint side overhang, joint width and lead width

The solder thickness (5) between the lead and the pad landing is not specified, but a properly wetted fillet must be present. The side joint length (6) of the solder joint, at the narrowest point, must be at least 150% the width of the lead (4).

Figure 3. solder joint thickness
Figure 4. solder joint length

Class 2 is typically focused on a commercial type of product where continued performance and extended life is required, and an uninterrupted service of the product is desired but not mission critical. The normal environment (temperature and contamination) for this end user is not considered extreme.

Gull Wing Components

Because Class 2 provides the manufacturer a larger degree of imperfection in the solder joint, it is easier to manufacture at this level and often cheaper to produce. An example of this is the “pad offset” or the overhang of the contact from the pad. The Toe Overhang is defined in similar way as shown in Figure 1 for J-lead also for Gull Wing termination style, and is acceptable as long as it does not violate electrical clearance. This also means there is no requirement for a Toe Filet. The Side Overhang is shown in Figure 2., and Joint Width is also measured as is shown in (3) on the same figure.

Side Overhang (2), for Class 2, states a component lead may overhang the side of the land (contact pad) with a maximum of 50% the lead width(4), or 0.02 in. (0.5 mm), whichever is less. End Joint Width (3) is the width of the solder joint at the most narrow point. This width must be a minimum of 50% the width of the lead (4) . 

Side Joint Length (6) for a “long foot,” or a Lead Foot Length (5) that is equal to or greater than three lead widths (4), the Side Joint Length (6) must be a minimum of 3 (4) or 75% of (5); which ever is the longer of the two.

Class 3

J-Lead Components

Many high-reliability components and connectors can meet IPC-A-610 Class 3, which is usually required when a product must maintain high performance in extreme or harsh conditions. Military, aerospace, and medical applications typically require Class 3 products.

Class 3 imposes stricter inspection requirements for solder joints compared to Class 2. While the solder thickness (5) remains unchanged, the side joint length (6) is the same as Class 2. However, several other specifications have increased requirements.

For instance, the side overhang (2) and end joint width (3) are both tightened by 25% in both directions. The side overhang is limited to a maximum of 25% of the lead width (4), while the end joint thickness (3) is increased to a minimum of 75% of the lead width (4). Although this may not appear to be a significant increase, it does pose challenges in producing conforming products.

Gull Wing Components

Some requirements are similar in Class 2 and Class 3; such as the Solder Joint Length (6) and Toe Overhang (1). However, many of requirements are significantly more difficult to meet in a Class 3 solder joint.

End Joint Width (3) and Side Overhang (2), are both required to meet a more stringent specification. The End Joint (3) must be at least 75% of the lead width (4), and the Side Overhang (2) only affords the lead width (4) a maximum 25% of the lead width (4) or 0.02 in. (0.5 mm), whichever is less of overhang on the side of land.

Related

Source: Samtec

Recent Posts

Power Electronics Tools for Passives and Magnetic Designs

27.1.2026
13

Exxelia Publishes Micropen White Papers for Printed Electronics

26.1.2026
24

Würth Elektronik Developed a Custom Transformer for Active Hand Orthosis

26.1.2026
28

Exxelia Offers Custom Naval Transformers and Inductors

21.1.2026
15

Conductive Polymer Capacitor Market and Design‑In Guide to 2035

20.1.2026
124

Littelfuse Unveils Ultra-Low-Power TMR Magnetic Switches

13.1.2026
35

DC/DC Push‑Pull Converter vs PSFB Design Guide

12.1.2026
127

Energy-Controlled Structural Evolution of Amorphous Ta₂O₅ in Tantalum Anodes

6.1.2026
57

Exxelia Releases Custom Smart Integrated Magnetics for Space Applications

5.1.2026
65

Upcoming Events

Feb 24
16:00 - 17:00 CET

Designing Qi2 Wireless Power Systems: Practical Development and EMC Optimization

Mar 3
16:00 - 17:00 CET

Cybersecurity at the Eleventh Hour – from RED to CRA – Information and Discussion

Mar 21
All day

PSMA Capacitor Workshop 2026

View Calendar

Popular Posts

  • Buck Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Boost Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • LLC Resonant Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Flyback Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Ripple Current and its Effects on the Performance of Capacitors

    3 shares
    Share 3 Tweet 0
  • How Metal Prices Are Driving Passive Component Price Hikes

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • MLCC and Ceramic Capacitors

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • What is a Dielectric Constant and DF of Plastic Materials?

    4 shares
    Share 4 Tweet 0
  • Degradation of Capacitors and its Failure Mechanisms

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Dual Active Bridge (DAB) Topology

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Newsletter Subscription

 

Passive Components Blog

© EPCI - Leading Passive Components Educational and Information Site

  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • EPCI Membership & Advertisement
  • About

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Knowledge Blog
  • PCNS

© EPCI - Leading Passive Components Educational and Information Site

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.
Go to mobile version