Instant PDF delivery after payment, plus emailed invoice.
The next decoupling breakthrough may not be another capacitor on the board. It may be capacitance built into the package.
The Silicon Capacitors and Integrated Passives Technology Dossier 10/26 examines when passive functions should remain discrete—and when they should move into the substrate, interposer or die. It connects silicon capacitor technology, thin-film integrated passive devices, embedded components, precision networks and integrated protection to the architectures that make integration worthwhile.
From high-current AI accelerator power delivery to automotive interfaces, RF modules and implantable medical systems, the question is no longer simply how much capacitance fits into a footprint. It is how much useful electrical performance survives the mounting geometry, operating conditions, assembly process and qualification requirements.
This dossier brings those decisions together with named suppliers, example parts, published specifications, integration economics and a clearly separated view of production technologies and emerging roadmaps.
Why this matters now
AI power delivery is changing where capacitance belongs. As accelerator currents increase, the electrical path between the capacitor and the load becomes a limiting factor. Land-side, die-side, interposer and embedded capacitance are becoming distinct layers of the power delivery network—not interchangeable replacements for the board-level capacitor bank.
Integration changes the comparison with discrete components. Nominal capacitance and purchase price tell only part of the story. Effective capacitance under operating conditions, loop inductance, board area, placement count, matching and assembly yield can change which solution delivers the better system result.
Qualification and sourcing must follow the construction. A monolithic silicon capacitor, a ceramic array and an embedded passive network can perform similar functions while requiring different qualification evidence, manufacturing partners and lifecycle planning. Integration can reduce part count while increasing dependence on a specific process or supplier.
Choosing integration late can turn an electrical improvement into a packaging, qualification or supply-chain problem. This dossier puts those trade-offs into the architecture discussion before the design is locked.
What’s inside
Sixteen chapters connecting integrated-passive technology to practical design, qualification and sourcing decisions.
Silicon capacitor construction and performance—from planar MIS/MOS and MIM structures to deep-trench and nanostructured approaches, with density, voltage, thickness, ESR, ESL, stability, leakage and lifetime considered together.
Power delivery architecture mapping—showing the roles of board-level, land-side, die-side, interposer and on-die capacitance, and why placement can matter more than the nominal value.
Thin-film integrated passive devices—covering silicon and glass platforms, monolithic resistor–inductor–capacitor integration, precision matching and the applications where IPDs offer an advantage over discrete networks.
Embedded and in-substrate passives—including PCB embedding, package substrates and interposers, with a dedicated silicon-versus-Class II MLCC comparison.
Integrated networks, arrays and LTCC modules—connecting resistor ratio performance, capacitor arrays, R-C networks and RF integration to selection and sourcing decisions.
The economics of integration—examining placement cost, bill-of-materials simplification, board area, yield, rework, non-recurring engineering costs, second sourcing and lifecycle exposure.
Integrated EMI/EMC and circuit protection—covering filter topologies, common-mode filters, ESD arrays and interface-specific selection, with attention to parasitics and signal loading.
Reliability and qualification clarity—explaining the AEC-Q200, AEC-Q100 and AEC-Q101 distinctions, alongside embedded-component standards, assembly sensitivity and application-specific derating.
A dedicated AI power-delivery deep dive—exploring silicon capacitors in vertical power delivery for kilowatt-class accelerators and the growing connection between capacitance, regulation and advanced packaging.
Application examples and technology roadmaps—covering AI accelerator PDNs, automotive zonal interfaces, implantable and RF systems, plus emerging glass substrates, high-density dielectrics and power-delivery integration.
A segment-specific supplier and supply-chain map—distinguishing silicon capacitor manufacturers, thin-film specialists, substrate makers, foundries and protection-device suppliers, while explicitly identifying gaps and conflicting market estimates.
| Section | Title | Page |
|---|---|---|
| — | Executive Overview | 4 |
| — | Scope and Methodology | 4 |
| 1 | Structural Trends Shaping Integrated Passives in 2026 | 6 |
| 2 | Market and Supply-Chain Environment | 8 |
| 2.1 | Market sizing and growth | 8 |
| 2.2 | Global leaders by segment | 10 |
| 2.3 | Lead times, pricing and capacity | 12 |
| 2.4 | Regional supply base and capacity additions | 13 |
| 3 | Architectures and the Role of Integrated Passives | 17 |
| 3.1 | The power delivery network and the decoupling hierarchy | 17 |
| 3.2 | Signal chain, RF front end and system partitioning | 18 |
| 4 | Silicon Capacitors: Construction, Density and Electrical Behaviour | 19 |
| 4.1 | Construction variants and dielectric stacks | 19 |
| 4.2 | Electrical behaviour and reliability | 21 |
| 4.3 | Suppliers and parts | 22 |
| 4.4 | Assembly, handling and thermal behaviour | 23 |
| 5 | Thin-Film Integrated Passive Devices on Silicon and Glass | 26 |
| 5.1 | Thin-film materials and process platforms | 26 |
| 5.2 | Monolithic R, L and C integration and product classes | 27 |
| 5.3 | Precision, matching and where IPDs beat discretes | 28 |
| 6 | Embedded and In-Substrate Passives | 30 |
| 6.1 | PCB and substrate embedding | 30 |
| 6.2 | Package- and interposer-level passives | 31 |
| 6.3 | Suppliers and parts | 32 |
| 6.4 | Silicon versus Class II MLCC in the substrate | 33 |
| 7 | Integrated Passive Networks, Arrays and LTCC Modules | 37 |
| 7.1 | From resistor SIPs to modern integrated networks | 37 |
| 7.2 | Resistor networks and precision ratio performance | 37 |
| 7.3 | Capacitor arrays, R-C networks and LTCC/MLO modules | 38 |
| 7.4 | Suppliers and selection guidance | 40 |
| 7.5 | RF integrated modules, filters and antenna front ends | 40 |
| 8 | The Economics of Integration: Discrete versus Integrated | 43 |
| 8.1 | Cost per placement and the assembly argument | 43 |
| 8.2 | Bill-of-materials, board area and total cost of ownership | 44 |
| 8.3 | Yield, value at risk and rework | 45 |
| 8.4 | NRE, second sourcing and lifecycle risk | 45 |
| Section | Title | Page |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Integrated EMI/EMC and Circuit Protection | 47 |
| 9.1 | Filter topology and the inductance argument | 47 |
| 9.2 | Integrated common-mode filters, ESD arrays and pi-filter networks | 48 |
| 9.3 | Suppliers and interface-rate selection | 49 |
| 10 | Reliability, Qualification and Standards | 51 |
| 10.1 | The AEC-Q200 versus AEC-Q100 distinction | 51 |
| 10.2 | Test regimes and severities | 51 |
| 10.3 | Capacitor and embedded-component standards | 52 |
| 10.4 | Derating and application-specific practice | 53 |
| 11 | Deep Dive: Silicon Capacitors in VPD for kW AI Accelerators | 54 |
| 11.1 | The power problem | 54 |
| 11.2 | Where the capacitance now goes | 54 |
| 11.3 | The capacitor becomes part of the regulator | 55 |
| 11.4 | Open challenges and the verdict | 56 |
| 12 | Application Examples | 57 |
| 12.1 | AI accelerator power delivery network | 57 |
| 12.2 | Automotive zonal gateway interface | 57 |
| 12.3 | Implantable and RF module | 58 |
| 12.4 | Additional application cases | 58 |
| 13 | Next-Generation Technologies | 61 |
| 13.1 | Substrates and dielectrics | 61 |
| 13.2 | Power delivery integration | 62 |
| 13.3 | RF, 6G and packaging integration | 62 |
| 14 | Design and Business Implications | 64 |
| 14.1 | Engineering implications | 64 |
| 14.2 | Procurement and supply-chain implications | 64 |
| 14.3 | Strategic outlook | 65 |
| 15 | Key Takeaways | 66 |
| 16 | About the Dossier | 67 |
| Appendix A | Abbreviations and Acronyms | 68 |
| Appendix B | Companies and Organisations Cited | 70 |
| — | References | 72 |
List of Figures
| Figure | Title | Page |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Capacitor market context and the two divergent silicon-capacitor forecast series | 9 |
| 2 | Quoted capacitor lead times by family against the all-technology average | 16 |
| 3 | The decoupling hierarchy by frequency band, technology and distance from the die | 17 |
| 4 | Construction variants of silicon capacitors in cross-section | 20 |
| 5 | Capacitance density by construction and generation, logarithmic scale | 21 |
| 6 | Layer sequence of a monolithic thin-film integrated passive device | 26 |
| 7 | Placement classes for integrated capacitance in a 2.5D accelerator package | 31 |
| 8 | Cumulative Class II capacitance loss and relative strength by selection criterion | 34 |
| 9 | Published placement costs and two integration case studies | 45 |
| 10 | Qualification route by component construction | 53 |
| 11 | Accelerator package power and published capacitance density by placement location | 55 |
| 12 | Published roadmap dates by programme, 2025 to 2030 | 63 |
List of Tables
| Table | Title | Page |
|---|---|---|
| 1-1 | The seven forces and the number that defines each in 2026 | 7 |
| 2-1 | Market sizing and forecasts by segment | 10 |
| 2-2 | Silicon and IPD global leaders | 12 |
| 2-3 | Manufacturing sites and published capacity additions by region | 15 |
| 3-1 | Decoupling hierarchy: bands, technologies and placement | 18 |
| 4-1 | Capacitance density and voltage rating by generation and technology | 21 |
| 4-2 | Electrical parameters, silicon capacitor versus Class II ceramic | 22 |
| 4-3 | Suppliers, example part numbers and ratings | 23 |
| 4-4 | Assembly, handling and thermal data: published values and gaps | 25 |
| 5-1 | Thin-film resistor and dielectric material properties | 27 |
| 5-2 | IPD product classes, part numbers and key ratings | 28 |
| 6-1 | Embedding materials and embeddable component classes | 30 |
| 6-2 | Package- and interposer-level capacitor technologies | 32 |
| 6-3 | Head-to-head parameter matrix, silicon versus Class II MLCC | 34 |
| 6-4 | Embedding-capable parts from both camps | 35 |
| 7-1 | Resistor networks: ratio tolerance, tracking TCR and package | 38 |
| 7-2 | Capacitor arrays and R-C networks: configuration and ratings | 39 |
| 7-3 | LTCC, MLO and integrated module technologies: design rules and material data | 40 |
| 7-4 | RF integrated modules: example parts and published ratings | 42 |
| 8-1 | Published cost-per-placement and assembly cost evidence | 43 |
| 8-2 | Integration case studies: BOM lines, area, cost and yield | 44 |
| 9-1 | Filter topologies and integrated filter parts, with insertion loss | 48 |
| 9-2 | Silicon protection arrays vs multilayer varistors | 49 |
| 10-1 | Standards register for integrated and embedded passives | 52 |
| 11-1 | Capacitance placement locations in a vertically powered accelerator package | 55 |
| 11-2 | Commercial and supply events in vertical-power silicon capacitance, 2026 | 56 |
| 12-1 | AI accelerator PDN component budget | 57 |
| 12-2 | Automotive interface protection bill of materials | 58 |
| 12-3 | Further application cases with named parts and published numeric requirements | 60 |
| 13-1 | Capacitance-density roadmap by technology and year | 62 |
| 13-2 | Consolidated roadmap dates by programme | 63 |
| B-1 | Manufacturers and technology suppliers cited, with segment and chapter references | 70 |
| B-2 | Standards bodies, research organisations and information sources cited | 71 |
COMPONENT MANUFACTURERS, SUPPLIERS AND SYSTEM COMPANIES CITED
| Company | Segment or role | Chapters |
|---|---|---|
| Absolics | Glass substrates | Front, 1, 2, 6, 11, 13 |
| AT&S | Substrates, embedded passives | 2, 6 |
| API Technologies | Filters, MIL-qualified modules | 7 |
| Bourns | Resistor networks, circuit protection | 2, 7, 9, 10, 12 |
| Daeduck Electronics | Substrates, embedded silicon capacitors | 6, 13 |
| Elohim | Embedded silicon capacitors | 6, 13 |
| Empower Semiconductor | Silicon capacitors, integrated power | Front, 2, 4, 6, 11, 12, 13, 15 |
| Ibiden | IC package substrates | 2, 6, 14 |
| Intel / Intel Foundry | Logic process, on-die MIM, glass substrates | Front, 1, 2, 4, 6, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, App. A |
| IPDiA | Silicon capacitors (now Murata) | 2, 4, 6, App. A |
| KEMET | Capacitors | 2 |
| Knowles Precision Devices | Capacitor arrays, X2Y, RF | 2, 4, 7 |
| KOA Speer | Thin-film resistors and networks | 7 |
| KYOCERA AVX | Capacitors, arrays, thin-film IPD | 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13 |
| LG Innotek | FC-BGA substrates | 2, 11 |
| Murata | Silicon capacitors, MLCC, IPD, LTCC | 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, App. A |
| Nexperia | Circuit protection | 2, 9, 10 |
| Octavo Systems | System-in-package | 8 |
| Ohmega Technologies | Embedded resistor foils | 5, 6, 8 |
| onsemi | Integrated passive devices, EMI filters | 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 12 |
| Oak-Mitsui / FaradFlex | Embedded capacitor laminates | 6 |
| Panasonic | Capacitors, resistor arrays, MLV | 7, 9 |
| Presidio Components | High-reliability ceramic capacitors | 2 |
| Samsung Electro-Mechanics | MLCC, silicon capacitors, glass substrates | 2, 4, 6, 11, 13, 14 |
| Samtec | Interconnect, integrated passives | 2, 6, 7 |
| Company | Segment or role | Chapters |
|---|---|---|
| Shinko Electric | IC package substrates | 2, 6 |
| Skyworks Solutions | RF front ends, silicon capacitors | 2, 4 |
| Smoltek | Carbon-nanofibre MIM capacitors | 2, 4, 6, 13 |
| STMicroelectronics | Silicon capacitors, EMI filters | 2, 7, 9 |
| Susumu | Thin-film resistors and networks | 7 |
| Ticer Technologies | Embedded resistor foils | 6 |
| TDK | MLCC, thin-film capacitors, EMI filters | 2, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12, App. A |
| TSMC | Foundry, deep-trench capacitors, CoWoS | 2, 4, 6, 11, 13, 15, App. A |
| TT Electronics | Resistor networks | 5, 7 |
| Unimicron | IC package substrates | 2, 6 |
| Vicor | Power delivery modules | 12 |
| Vishay | Resistor networks, capacitors, protection | 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10 |
| X-FAB | Foundry for passive integration | 5 |
| YAGEO | MLCC, resistors | 2, 6, 7 |
| Zowie Technology | Embeddable MLCC | 6 |
| Analog Devices | Power management; owner of Empower since 2026 | Front, 2, 11, 15 |
| Launchip | 3D silicon capacitors (China) | 2, 4, 6, 10, 11 |
| Senmaru Electronics | Deep-trench silicon capacitors, IPD (China) | 2, 11 |
| Torch Electron | Deep-trench silicon capacitors (China) | 2, 4, 11 |
| Marvell | Custom AI silicon, deep-trench test vehicles | 2, 5, 11 |
| NVIDIA | AI accelerators | Front, 11 |
| AMD | AI accelerators | Front, 11 |
| SKC | Glass substrates (Absolics parent) | 2, 11, 13 |
| Taiyo Yuden | MLCC, inductors | 2 |
Hardware and power-integrity engineers designing accelerator, processor and FPGA power delivery networks who need to evaluate capacitance, placement and package parasitics together.
Advanced-packaging and substrate engineers assessing embedded components, interposer capacitance and land-side or die-side integration.
RF and precision-analog designers comparing discrete networks with thin-film IPDs, matched arrays and LTCC modules.
Automotive and medical component engineers who need to connect electrical performance with qualification evidence, assembly constraints and long-life reliability.
Procurement and supply-chain teams evaluating supplier capabilities, custom-process dependence, second-source options and lifecycle risk.
Product and technology leaders deciding whether integration delivers enough performance, space or manufacturing value to justify its development cost and sourcing commitments.
This is not simply a silicon capacitor market report. It is a decision framework for when passive integration earns its place in a design—and when discrete components remain the better choice.
By connecting device physics, electrical placement, manufacturing economics, qualification and supplier capabilities, the dossier helps engineering and sourcing teams evaluate the complete integration trade-off rather than optimise one specification in isolation.