Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • NewsFilter
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest

    Binder Hybrid Connector Simplifies One Cable Automation

    Tapped Inductor Buck Converter Fundamentals

    TAIYO YUDEN Releases Mini Metal Power Inductors

    Molecular Memristor Shows Record 145 kH Emergent Inductance

    Planar vs Conventional Transformer: When it Make Sense

    Researchers Propose Next‑Gen Compact Memory Using Ultra-thin Ferroelectric Capacitors

    Nichicon ADN Automotive Hybrid Aluminum Capacitors Now Available in EMEA

    Wk 19 Electronics Supply Chain Digest

    Electrocaloric Multilayer Capacitors: Towards Quiet, Solid‑State Cooling Around Room Temperature

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • VideoFilter
    • All
    • Antenna videos
    • Capacitor videos
    • Circuit Protection Video
    • Filter videos
    • Fuse videos
    • Inductor videos
    • Inter-Connect Video
    • Non-linear passives videos
    • Oscillator videos
    • Passive sensors videos
    • Resistor videos

    Tapped Inductor Buck Converter Fundamentals

    Planar vs Conventional Transformer: When it Make Sense

    Modeling Fringing Field Losses in Inductors & Transformers

    Why Power Inductors Use a Ferrite Core With an Air Gap

    Transformer-Based Power-Line Harvester Magnetic Design

    Thermal Modeling of Magnetics

    Standard vs Planar LLC transformers Comparison for Battery Chargers

    How Modern Tools Model Magnetic Components for Power Electronics

    Advanced Loss Modeling for Planar Magnetics in the Frenetic Planar Tool

    Trending Tags

    • Capacitors explained
    • Inductors explained
    • Resistors explained
    • Filters explained
    • Application Video Guidelines
    • EMC
    • New Products
    • Ripple Current
    • Simulation
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
  • Knowledge Blog
  • DossiersNew
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • PCNS
    • PCNS 2025
    • PCNS 2023
    • PCNS 2021
    • PCNS 2019
    • PCNS 2017
  • Events
  • Home
  • NewsFilter
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest

    Binder Hybrid Connector Simplifies One Cable Automation

    Tapped Inductor Buck Converter Fundamentals

    TAIYO YUDEN Releases Mini Metal Power Inductors

    Molecular Memristor Shows Record 145 kH Emergent Inductance

    Planar vs Conventional Transformer: When it Make Sense

    Researchers Propose Next‑Gen Compact Memory Using Ultra-thin Ferroelectric Capacitors

    Nichicon ADN Automotive Hybrid Aluminum Capacitors Now Available in EMEA

    Wk 19 Electronics Supply Chain Digest

    Electrocaloric Multilayer Capacitors: Towards Quiet, Solid‑State Cooling Around Room Temperature

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • VideoFilter
    • All
    • Antenna videos
    • Capacitor videos
    • Circuit Protection Video
    • Filter videos
    • Fuse videos
    • Inductor videos
    • Inter-Connect Video
    • Non-linear passives videos
    • Oscillator videos
    • Passive sensors videos
    • Resistor videos

    Tapped Inductor Buck Converter Fundamentals

    Planar vs Conventional Transformer: When it Make Sense

    Modeling Fringing Field Losses in Inductors & Transformers

    Why Power Inductors Use a Ferrite Core With an Air Gap

    Transformer-Based Power-Line Harvester Magnetic Design

    Thermal Modeling of Magnetics

    Standard vs Planar LLC transformers Comparison for Battery Chargers

    How Modern Tools Model Magnetic Components for Power Electronics

    Advanced Loss Modeling for Planar Magnetics in the Frenetic Planar Tool

    Trending Tags

    • Capacitors explained
    • Inductors explained
    • Resistors explained
    • Filters explained
    • Application Video Guidelines
    • EMC
    • New Products
    • Ripple Current
    • Simulation
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
  • Knowledge Blog
  • DossiersNew
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • PCNS
    • PCNS 2025
    • PCNS 2023
    • PCNS 2021
    • PCNS 2019
    • PCNS 2017
  • Events
No Result
View All Result
Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result

EEStor Announces Results of Phase 9 Hybrid Dielectrics Testing

27.11.2019
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A

Source: EEStor news

EEStor Announces Results of Phase 9 Hybrid Dielectrics Testing. Near doubling of relative permittivity (κ) over Phase 8 samples, resulting in a further reduction in size and material cost by a factor of two, without increasing leakage EEStor’s CMBT-Glass hybrid material’s ability to maintain its capacitance as voltage is increased (referred to as the DC bias performance) is a significant differentiator over other existing Type II ceramic dielectrics

RelatedPosts

Insertion Loss and Performance in EMI Filtering

New High-K dielectric Low Loss Sulfur-Selenium Alloys

Plastic Materials Dielectric Constant and DF

TORONTO, Ontario/AUSTIN, Texas – November 28, 2018 – EEStor Corporation (TSXV:ESU), developers of high energy density, solid-state capacitors, today announced significant performance improvements across many different metrics for its Composition Modified Barium Titanate (CMBT)-Glass and CMBT-Polymer hybrid dielectric development programs.

EEStor’s Phase 9 CMBT-Glass samples demonstrate a near doubling of relative permittivity (κ) with field over Phase 8 samples, with similar or improved resistivity. This means that capacitors using Phase 9 dielectrics would be half the physical size of those disclosed in Phase 8 for the same performance.

Considering EEStor’s already disclosed anticipated market advantage of the Phase 8 dielectric over existing technology, featuring size advantages in a range varying from 14% to 1,195% depending on application for the same performance, these volume advantages will now be enhanced by a further reduction in volume of 50% utilizing Phase 9 dielectrics.

A size advantage of 28%, means the manufacturer of that specific capacitor will use 28% less material by utilizing EEStor CMBT for the same performance. When determining comparable cost, the volume of raw material used is the most significant driver in the cost-driven capacitor commodity market. Smaller component size also enables improved miniaturized designs and enables new market opportunities for EEStor.

It is important to note that this near doubling of κ with field did not come at the expense of  resistivity (which translates into higher energy leakage), a common trade off in the industry. Rather, this near doubling of κ with field was delivered with improved resistivity, with a notable increased self-discharge time constant for a single layer of Phase 9 dielectric of 1,265 seconds, compared to 484 seconds in Phase 8. EEStor has published a guide to help understand the different metrics commonly used in the capacitor industry.

This Phase 9 release of CMBT-Glass dielectrics also highlights how this hybrid composition offers a significant differentiator over other Type II ceramic dielectrics, which in turn highlights the inherent properties of EEStor CMBT ceramic powder.  Slight differences in the types of glass, glass content, coatings and/or other additions to the powder can result in drastic changes to the Thermal Coefficient of Capacitance and to the DC bias voltage saturation characteristics of EEStor CMBT-Glass hybrid dielectrics.

Thermal Coefficient of Capacitance and DC bias voltage saturation are measurements of how the performance of the dielectric varies with temperature and high voltage. The lowest possible variation of the performance with temperature enables more demanding applications (outdoor, notably, but in more strenuous industrial and automotive conditions as well) and thus, broader market opportunities for EEStor’s technology.

Low variation of the performance at higher and higher voltages is the key to realizing  EEStor’s ultimate objectives in the energy storage market. The Phase 9 white paper further explains how different hybrid formulations have helped EEStor to start minimizing both the performance variation with temperature and higher voltage, without compromising any other performance characteristics.

EEStor is also pleased to report considerable progress in its CMBT-Polymer hybrid programs. Significant leakage reduction in comparison to Phase 6 polymers is disclosed in both UL and UH type Phase 9 samples. This means the energy returned by these samples reached 79% of the energy stored, a 26 times improvement over the samples of Phase 6.

The focus of the CMBT-Polymer hybrid development path is to develop samples that can reach very high voltage in flexible layers that are a few microns-thick. The classical challenges EEStor faces is to balance the tradeoff between low leakage (high resistivity) and high charge capacity (relative permittivity).

A last key development of the CMBT-Polymer program is that the thermal performance of EEStor CMBT-Polymer hybrid samples has been improved to the Y8R level. This means that the samples experience less than 15% variation in performance over a temperature range of -30°C to 150°C (-22°F to 302°F). That is a significant improvement over the previously disclosed Y5T level which represents a +22% -33% variation in performance over a temperature range of -30°C to 85°C (-22°F to 185°F).

Ian Clifford founder and CEO of EEStor stated, “Performance of EEStor’s Phase 9 samples show another significant reduction in capacitor volume with concurrent increase in resistance over the performance of EEStor’s Phase 8 samples.   The increase in performance of Phase 9 samples expands potential existing markets for the technology, while opening new market opportunities and makes EEStor dielectrics an even more exciting value proposition for potential licensees.”

Results

The relevant third-party testing reports are contained in a White Paper with a detailed analysis of the results and a guide to help understand it can all be found at. Phase 9 White Paper,

Understanding EEStor Parameters.

Related

Recent Posts

Molecular Memristor Shows Record 145 kH Emergent Inductance

12.5.2026
11

Researchers Propose Next‑Gen Compact Memory Using Ultra-thin Ferroelectric Capacitors

11.5.2026
28

Nichicon ADN Automotive Hybrid Aluminum Capacitors Now Available in EMEA

11.5.2026
23

Electrocaloric Multilayer Capacitors: Towards Quiet, Solid‑State Cooling Around Room Temperature

7.5.2026
186

High-Crystallinity Nanocrystalline Composites for MHz Chip Inductors

7.5.2026
63

KYOCERA 10 µF 0201 MLCC Brings High‑Capacitance into Mobile Designs

6.5.2026
54

Energy Localization in Tantalum Anode Formation: A Structural Perspective

4.5.2026
46

YAGEO Introduces C0G Flexible Termination Automotive MLCCs

30.4.2026
41

Kyocera Developed Multilayer Ceramic Core Substrate for AI Packages

30.4.2026
50

Upcoming Events

May 19
16:00 - 17:00 CEST

Designing Qi2 Wireless Power Systems: Practical Development and EMC Optimization

Jun 2
16:00 - 17:00 CEST

Calculation, Simulation and Measurement of 800V EMC Filters

Jun 16
16:00 - 17:00 CEST

EMC with EMC – EMC‑compliant design with electromechanical connectors

View Calendar

Popular Posts

  • Buck Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Boost Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Flyback Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • LLC Resonant Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • MLCC and Ceramic Capacitors

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Dual Active Bridge (DAB) Topology

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Capacitor Charging and Discharging

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • What Electronics Engineer Needs to Know About Passive Low Pass Filters

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Ripple Current and its Effects on the Performance of Capacitors

    3 shares
    Share 3 Tweet 0
  • MLCC Case Sizes Standards Explained

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Newsletter Subscription

 

Passive Components Blog

© EPCI - Leading Passive Components Educational and Information Site

  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • EPCI Membership & Advertisement
  • About

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Knowledge Blog
  • PCNS

© EPCI - Leading Passive Components Educational and Information Site

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.
Go to mobile version