Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • NewsFilter
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest

    Itelcond Introduces High‑Voltage Aluminium Capacitors for Modern IGBT DC‑links

    Bourns Introduces Automotive Shielded Power Inductors for Compact DC‑DC Converters

    EMC Design Fundamentals: Safe Use of Varistors and Common Mode Chokes in Mains and Data-Line Filters

    Murata Unveils Lead Disc Ceramic Capacitors for Automotive Safety and EMI Suppression

    SCHURTER Releases Intelligent Three‑Terminal Fuses for Safer Li‑ion Battery Systems

    Can Copper Conductive Inks Displace Silver in Hybrid Electronics?

    Square-Wave Harmonics and RMS Currents in Power Converters

    LeanBOM: Practical Cross‑Technology Capacitor Search by Real Working Conditions

    In the Age of AI, Every Watt Counts: Implications for Components

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • VideoFilter
    • All
    • Antenna videos
    • Capacitor videos
    • Circuit Protection Video
    • Filter videos
    • Fuse videos
    • Inductor videos
    • Inter-Connect Video
    • Non-linear passives videos
    • Oscillator videos
    • Passive sensors videos
    • Resistor videos

    EMC Design Fundamentals: Safe Use of Varistors and Common Mode Chokes in Mains and Data-Line Filters

    Ferrite versus Nanocrystalline Power Inductor Cores: Turns, Gap and Size

    KYOCERA AVX Presents Antenna Integrator Studio Tutorial for Antenna Placement and RF Design

    Power Design Simulation Tools for Faster Inductor Selection and Loss Optimization

    EMC‑Compliant PCB and Connector Design Guidelines

    Why Isolated DC/DC Power Supplies Fail Late, Würth Elektronik Podcast

    Designing 800 V DC EMC Filters: Calculation, Simulation and Measurement

    Current Sense Transformer Datasheet and Design‑in Guide

    Designing a USB Type‑C Flyback Planar Transformer with Frenetic’s Planar Tool

    Trending Tags

    • Capacitors explained
    • Inductors explained
    • Resistors explained
    • Filters explained
    • Application Video Guidelines
    • EMC
    • New Products
    • Ripple Current
    • Simulation
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
  • Knowledge Blog
  • Dossiers
    • AI Hardware Dossier
    • Power Converter Dossier
    • Automotive Dossier
    • Capacitor Dossier
    • Resistor Dossier
    • Inductor Dossier
    • Circuit Protection Dossier
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • PCNS
    • PCNS 2025
    • PCNS 2023
    • PCNS 2021
    • PCNS 2019
    • PCNS 2017
  • Events
  • Home
  • NewsFilter
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest

    Itelcond Introduces High‑Voltage Aluminium Capacitors for Modern IGBT DC‑links

    Bourns Introduces Automotive Shielded Power Inductors for Compact DC‑DC Converters

    EMC Design Fundamentals: Safe Use of Varistors and Common Mode Chokes in Mains and Data-Line Filters

    Murata Unveils Lead Disc Ceramic Capacitors for Automotive Safety and EMI Suppression

    SCHURTER Releases Intelligent Three‑Terminal Fuses for Safer Li‑ion Battery Systems

    Can Copper Conductive Inks Displace Silver in Hybrid Electronics?

    Square-Wave Harmonics and RMS Currents in Power Converters

    LeanBOM: Practical Cross‑Technology Capacitor Search by Real Working Conditions

    In the Age of AI, Every Watt Counts: Implications for Components

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • VideoFilter
    • All
    • Antenna videos
    • Capacitor videos
    • Circuit Protection Video
    • Filter videos
    • Fuse videos
    • Inductor videos
    • Inter-Connect Video
    • Non-linear passives videos
    • Oscillator videos
    • Passive sensors videos
    • Resistor videos

    EMC Design Fundamentals: Safe Use of Varistors and Common Mode Chokes in Mains and Data-Line Filters

    Ferrite versus Nanocrystalline Power Inductor Cores: Turns, Gap and Size

    KYOCERA AVX Presents Antenna Integrator Studio Tutorial for Antenna Placement and RF Design

    Power Design Simulation Tools for Faster Inductor Selection and Loss Optimization

    EMC‑Compliant PCB and Connector Design Guidelines

    Why Isolated DC/DC Power Supplies Fail Late, Würth Elektronik Podcast

    Designing 800 V DC EMC Filters: Calculation, Simulation and Measurement

    Current Sense Transformer Datasheet and Design‑in Guide

    Designing a USB Type‑C Flyback Planar Transformer with Frenetic’s Planar Tool

    Trending Tags

    • Capacitors explained
    • Inductors explained
    • Resistors explained
    • Filters explained
    • Application Video Guidelines
    • EMC
    • New Products
    • Ripple Current
    • Simulation
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
  • Knowledge Blog
  • Dossiers
    • AI Hardware Dossier
    • Power Converter Dossier
    • Automotive Dossier
    • Capacitor Dossier
    • Resistor Dossier
    • Inductor Dossier
    • Circuit Protection Dossier
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • PCNS
    • PCNS 2025
    • PCNS 2023
    • PCNS 2021
    • PCNS 2019
    • PCNS 2017
  • Events
No Result
View All Result
Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result

Off-the-Shelf vs Customized Inductor Solutions

18.12.2023
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A

This article is based on blog written by Pablo Blázquez, Frenetic power electronics engineer that compares inductor and transformer solutions for Buck-Boost Converter and discusses benefits of Off-the-Shelf vs Customized solutions.

As technology continues to advance, demands for compact and efficient Power Converters are on the rise.

RelatedPosts

Designing a USB Type‑C Flyback Planar Transformer with Frenetic’s Planar Tool

Designing a Custom Core Transformer for 10 kW LLC Data Center Power Stages

Magnetics Design in High‑Frequency GaN Converters

Magnetics, such as Inductors and Transformers, are the ones that help achieve this goal by significantly contributing to the miniaturization of Converters.

In Power Converters, Inductors are commonly used to smooth out the current, reduce ripple, and store energy that can be released when needed.

Transformers are instrumental in changing voltage levels, stepping up or stepping down as required.

Buck-Boost Converter Off-the-Shelf vs. Customized Solutions

To show the impact of Magnetics on size reduction, let’s take into consideration the Buck-Boost Converter. This topology is widely used for voltage regulation, capable of both stepping up and stepping down the input voltage.

Many engineers opt for off-the-shelf Magnetics components due to their convenience and availability. However, when it comes to achieving the smallest possible size for a Converter, these components might fall short.

  1. Size: off-the-shelf components are designed to meet general requirements, resulting in compromises. The physical dimensions of these components may not perfectly align with the space constraints of a specific application.
  2. Time: acquiring off-the-shelf components is quick, but integrating them into a design might take additional time. Modifications to the circuitry to accommodate these components could be necessary.
  3. Cost: off-the-shelf components are cost-effective in terms of initial investment, but they might not be the most economical choice in the long run if they lead to suboptimal performance or if additional modifications are needed.

For projects where size is a critical factor, investing in customized solutions for Magnetic components could be a game-changer.

  1. Size: tailoring Inductors and Transformers to the exact specifications of the application allows for a more efficient use of space. This can result in a significant reduction in the overall size of the Converter.
  2. Time: while designing and manufacturing custom Magnetics may take a bit longer, the time invested is often justified by the improved performance and size reduction achieved.
  3. Cost: customization may involve higher upfront costs, but the long-term benefits, such as improved efficiency and reduced footprint, can make it a cost-effective choice over the converter’s lifecycle.

Buck-Boost Converter Case Study

Let’s consider now a practical scenario involving a Buck-Boost Converter for a portable electronic device. First, let’s imagine an Off-the-Shelf scenario, where engineers choose off-the-shelf Inductors and Transformers for the Buck-Boost Converter. While these components meet the basic requirements, the Converter’s size is larger than desired due to the compromise on form factor.

Then we move to a Customized Solution scenario. In this case, engineers decide to invest in custom Inductors and Transformers precisely tailored to the specifications of the application. The result is a Buck-Boost Converter that not only meets all performance criteria, but is also significantly smaller in size.

Let’s explore now on the comparative data. For Off-the-Shelf components:

  • Size: 100mm x 80mm x 20mm
  • Efficiency: 90%
  • Cost: $10 per unit
  • Design and Integration Time: 2 weeks

While, for the customized solution:

  • Size: 60mm x 40mm x 15mm
  • Efficiency: 95%
  • Cost: $15 per unit
  • Design and Integration Time: 4 weeks

Conclusion

While off-the-shelf Magnetics components provide a quick and cost-effective solution, they might not be the optimal choice when size is a critical factor. Customized Inductors and Transformers, despite requiring more time and upfront investment, offer a tailored approach that can significantly reduce the overall size of the Converter while improving performance.

As technology continues to advance, the importance of Magnetics in Power Electronics cannot be overstated. The choice between off-the-shelf and customized solutions ultimately depends on the specific requirements of the application, with an eye on achieving the perfect balance between size, efficiency, and cost.

Related

Source: Frenetic

Recent Posts

Bourns Introduces Automotive Shielded Power Inductors for Compact DC‑DC Converters

16.7.2026
21

EMC Design Fundamentals: Safe Use of Varistors and Common Mode Chokes in Mains and Data-Line Filters

16.7.2026
38

Square-Wave Harmonics and RMS Currents in Power Converters

14.7.2026
33

In the Age of AI, Every Watt Counts: Implications for Components

13.7.2026
51

RF Filters and Passive Components Enabling the 7 Missile RF Subsystems

9.7.2026
54

Ferrite versus Nanocrystalline Power Inductor Cores: Turns, Gap and Size

9.7.2026
85

YAGEO Presents NANOMET Soft Magnetic Cores for High‑Density Power Conversion

8.7.2026
140

Coilcraft Releases High-Current Ferrite Beads for CISPR 25 EMC compliance

8.7.2026
44

From DCL to SSC: Bridging Electrical Symptoms and Structural Indicators in Tantalum Capacitors

7.7.2026
62

Upcoming Events

Jul 21
16:00 - 17:00 CEST

Safety by design: X and Y Interference suppression capacitors for power line filters

Jul 28
8:00 - 11:00 CEST

Post Procurement Testing of EEE Components for LEO Space Applications

Jul 29
17:30 - 18:30 CEST

To Ferrite or to Nanocrystalline in Transformer Design

View Calendar

Popular Posts

  • Boost Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Buck Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • YAGEO Announces July 2026 Capacitor Price Increase

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Flyback Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • LLC Resonant Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • MLCC and Ceramic Capacitors

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Earthing Systems and IEC Classification Explained

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Nvidia Vera Rubin: Why One AI Rack Needs So Many More MLCC Capacitors

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • MLCCs in the Age of AI: Q2 2026 Market Tightness

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Dual Active Bridge (DAB) Topology

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Newsletter Subscription

 

Passive Components Blog

© EPCI - Leading Passive Components Educational and Information Site

  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • EPCI Membership & Advertisement
  • About

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Knowledge Blog
  • Dossiers
  • PCNS

© EPCI - Leading Passive Components Educational and Information Site

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.
Go to mobile version