Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • NewsFilter
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest

    Middle East Conflict: The Potential Impact to Passive Components

    Wk 12 Electronics Supply Chain Digest

    Designing a 2 kW LLC Transformer with Integrated Resonant Inductor

    Inductor Technology Dossier

    Coilcraft Releases TLVR Inductors for High Density VRMs and PoL Converters

    Rutheniums Critical Role in Passive Component Supply Chains

    Bourns Expands its Modular Contacts for Power-Dense Systems

    Murata to Decouple China Rare Earth Supply in 3 Years

    Samtec AcceleRate Slim ARC6 Cable Assemblies with New Signaling Options

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • VideoFilter
    • All
    • Antenna videos
    • Capacitor videos
    • Circuit Protection Video
    • Filter videos
    • Fuse videos
    • Inductor videos
    • Inter-Connect Video
    • Non-linear passives videos
    • Oscillator videos
    • Passive sensors videos
    • Resistor videos

    Thermal Modeling of Magnetics

    Standard vs Planar LLC transformers Comparison for Battery Chargers

    How Modern Tools Model Magnetic Components for Power Electronics

    Advanced Loss Modeling for Planar Magnetics in the Frenetic Planar Tool

    2026 Power Magnetics Design Trends: Flyback, DAB and Planar

    Enabling Software‑Defined Vehicle Architectures: Automotive Ethernet and Zonal Smart Power

    Calculating Resistance Value of a Flyback RC Snubber 

    One‑Pulse Characterization of Nonlinear Power Inductors

    Thermistor Linearization Challenges

    Trending Tags

    • Capacitors explained
    • Inductors explained
    • Resistors explained
    • Filters explained
    • Application Video Guidelines
    • EMC
    • New Products
    • Ripple Current
    • Simulation
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
  • Knowledge Blog
  • DossiersNew
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • PCNS
    • PCNS 2025
    • PCNS 2023
    • PCNS 2021
    • PCNS 2019
    • PCNS 2017
  • Events
  • Home
  • NewsFilter
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest

    Middle East Conflict: The Potential Impact to Passive Components

    Wk 12 Electronics Supply Chain Digest

    Designing a 2 kW LLC Transformer with Integrated Resonant Inductor

    Inductor Technology Dossier

    Coilcraft Releases TLVR Inductors for High Density VRMs and PoL Converters

    Rutheniums Critical Role in Passive Component Supply Chains

    Bourns Expands its Modular Contacts for Power-Dense Systems

    Murata to Decouple China Rare Earth Supply in 3 Years

    Samtec AcceleRate Slim ARC6 Cable Assemblies with New Signaling Options

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • VideoFilter
    • All
    • Antenna videos
    • Capacitor videos
    • Circuit Protection Video
    • Filter videos
    • Fuse videos
    • Inductor videos
    • Inter-Connect Video
    • Non-linear passives videos
    • Oscillator videos
    • Passive sensors videos
    • Resistor videos

    Thermal Modeling of Magnetics

    Standard vs Planar LLC transformers Comparison for Battery Chargers

    How Modern Tools Model Magnetic Components for Power Electronics

    Advanced Loss Modeling for Planar Magnetics in the Frenetic Planar Tool

    2026 Power Magnetics Design Trends: Flyback, DAB and Planar

    Enabling Software‑Defined Vehicle Architectures: Automotive Ethernet and Zonal Smart Power

    Calculating Resistance Value of a Flyback RC Snubber 

    One‑Pulse Characterization of Nonlinear Power Inductors

    Thermistor Linearization Challenges

    Trending Tags

    • Capacitors explained
    • Inductors explained
    • Resistors explained
    • Filters explained
    • Application Video Guidelines
    • EMC
    • New Products
    • Ripple Current
    • Simulation
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
  • Knowledge Blog
  • DossiersNew
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • PCNS
    • PCNS 2025
    • PCNS 2023
    • PCNS 2021
    • PCNS 2019
    • PCNS 2017
  • Events
No Result
View All Result
Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result

Frenetic Reveals Core OptimizerTM Tool for Quick Selection of Magnetic Components’ Optimal Core Type

8.11.2022
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A

Frenetic reveals its latest secret, a powerful technology that enables to choose the optimal core up to 100 times faster. Frenetic Core OptimizerTM is a new tool integrated in the online platform, capable of comparing results in a matter of seconds.

Frenetic, the Spanish tech company born to change the Power Electronics industry, launches the latest version of their online platform. Its novelty is the Frenetic Core OptimizerTM, ready to solve some of the problems that engineers face every day.

RelatedPosts

Designing a 2 kW LLC Transformer with Integrated Resonant Inductor

Thermal Modeling of Magnetics

Standard vs Planar LLC transformers Comparison for Battery Chargers

Every Power Electronics engineer knows how long it takes to make decisions in the magnetics designs process, especially with the core selection, that determines the size and price of the final product. Those more experienced already have their own algorithms implemented in a calculation program or an Excel sheet. However, it is difficult to include new variables, such as new materials, and sometimes they must restart all the process when moving to a different project. Those with less experience in the field must do all the necessary lab experiments to create their own method, together with a design system.

Currently, the best engineers around the world are using Frenetic Online for choosing the most suitable option for their components in the shortest period. In the last few years, through the Frenetic online platform, hundreds of companies have designed and manufactured samples of their most complex components, decreasing the size up to 3 times compared to their previous solution, and securing the supply chain, even under the current circumstances. This experience has built a consolidated team of engineers with the necessary knowledge to implement solutions based on the scientific method.

In the words of Dr. Chema Molina, CEO of the company: “At Frenetic, we have always worked to empower our users and make their work more effective. After years of experience with some of the best manufacturers worldwide, covering very specific needs, we have been able to learn from our successes and experiences. Today, we can finally provide our customers with this knowledge to use in the decision-making process and turn the design and manufacturing procedure even more efficient.”

Figure 1 – Frenetic Core Optimizer TM Ve vs.N turns.
Figure 2 – Frenetic Core Optimizer TM Core Losses vs.N turns Chart

Frenetic has therefore released the Core OptimizerTM, result of the application of the scientific method in the design of high frequency magnetics. This new tool comes from the necessity of having a feature based on Frenetic’s laboratory experienced that enables the users to have much more accurate results and with less iterations.

The Core OptimizerTM, already available on Frenetic online, provides the most accurate results within just a few seconds, supporting the engineers when selecting the optimal core for the magnetics component. During the design process, after the introduction of the specific waveform and losses target, the engineer only has to select the Core OptimizerTM tab and start comparing all cores in a family by the turns needed, and core by core, until the optimal core is found.

Related

Source: Frenetic

Recent Posts

Middle East Conflict: The Potential Impact to Passive Components

23.3.2026
42

Designing a 2 kW LLC Transformer with Integrated Resonant Inductor

20.3.2026
19

Inductor Technology Dossier

19.3.2026
34

Coilcraft Releases TLVR Inductors for High Density VRMs and PoL Converters

19.3.2026
28

Vishay Introduced Space-Grade SMT Common Mode Choke

19.3.2026
13

Exxelia to Exhibit at APEC 2026 in San Antonio, Texas

17.3.2026
35

Thermal Modeling of Magnetics

16.3.2026
23

ESA SPCD 26 Call for Papers Extended to 30th March

16.3.2026
83

Standard vs Planar LLC transformers Comparison for Battery Chargers

13.3.2026
33

Upcoming Events

Mar 24
9:00 - 10:00 CET

Power protection in the digital age – eFuse and hot-swap strategies for modern data center design

Apr 21
16:00 - 17:00 CEST

Heatsink Solutions: Thermal Management in electronic devices

May 5
16:00 - 17:00 CEST

Understanding and Selecting Capacitors – Fundamentals, Technologies and Latest Trends

View Calendar

Popular Posts

  • Buck Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Boost Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Flyback Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • LLC Resonant Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • MLCC Manufacturers Consider Price Increase as AI Demand Outpaces Supply

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • MLCC and Ceramic Capacitors

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Dual Active Bridge (DAB) Topology

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Ripple Current and its Effects on the Performance of Capacitors

    3 shares
    Share 3 Tweet 0
  • MLCC Case Sizes Standards Explained

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • What is a Dielectric Constant and DF of Plastic Materials?

    4 shares
    Share 4 Tweet 0

Newsletter Subscription

 

Passive Components Blog

© EPCI - Leading Passive Components Educational and Information Site

  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • EPCI Membership & Advertisement
  • About

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Knowledge Blog
  • PCNS

© EPCI - Leading Passive Components Educational and Information Site

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.
Go to mobile version