Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest

    August 2026 Interconnect, Passives and Electromechanical Components Market Insights

    AEM Introduced High-Power Fuses for Compact Automotive and Industrial Overcurrent Protection

    Knowles Cornell Dubilier 105C Flatpack Aluminum Electrolytic Capacitors Target Low-Profile High-Density Power Designs

    Vishay Thin Film Chip Resistors Combine up to 50 GHz Operation with High Power Density

    Samsung Electro-Mechanics Secures KRW 1.0722 Trillion AI Server MLCC Supply Contract

    KYOCERA AVX Adds 0201 C0G RF MLCCs to KGU Ultra-Low-ESR Capacitor Series

    Vishay Extends High-Current Common-Mode Chokes with 30 A EMI Filtering up to 150 °C

    Bourns Copper-Electrode MOV Series Targets High-Energy Line Surge Protection

    Bourns Expands 12 mm SMD Incremental Encoder with Shaft-Length Options for Compact HMI Controls

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • Knowledge Blog
  • Dossiers
    • AI Hardware Dossier
    • Automotive Dossier
    • Industrial Robotics Dossier
    • Power Converter Dossier
    • Capacitor Dossier
    • Resistor Dossier
    • Inductor Dossier
    • Circuit Protection Dossier
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • PCNS
    • PCNS 2025
    • PCNS 2023
    • PCNS 2021
    • PCNS 2019
    • PCNS 2017
  • Events
  • Home
  • News
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest

    August 2026 Interconnect, Passives and Electromechanical Components Market Insights

    AEM Introduced High-Power Fuses for Compact Automotive and Industrial Overcurrent Protection

    Knowles Cornell Dubilier 105C Flatpack Aluminum Electrolytic Capacitors Target Low-Profile High-Density Power Designs

    Vishay Thin Film Chip Resistors Combine up to 50 GHz Operation with High Power Density

    Samsung Electro-Mechanics Secures KRW 1.0722 Trillion AI Server MLCC Supply Contract

    KYOCERA AVX Adds 0201 C0G RF MLCCs to KGU Ultra-Low-ESR Capacitor Series

    Vishay Extends High-Current Common-Mode Chokes with 30 A EMI Filtering up to 150 °C

    Bourns Copper-Electrode MOV Series Targets High-Energy Line Surge Protection

    Bourns Expands 12 mm SMD Incremental Encoder with Shaft-Length Options for Compact HMI Controls

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • Knowledge Blog
  • Dossiers
    • AI Hardware Dossier
    • Automotive Dossier
    • Industrial Robotics Dossier
    • Power Converter Dossier
    • Capacitor Dossier
    • Resistor Dossier
    • Inductor Dossier
    • Circuit Protection Dossier
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • PCNS
    • PCNS 2025
    • PCNS 2023
    • PCNS 2021
    • PCNS 2019
    • PCNS 2017
  • Events
No Result
View All Result
Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result

Frenetic Reveals Core OptimizerTM Tool for Quick Selection of Magnetic Components’ Optimal Core Type

8.11.2022
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A

Frenetic reveals its latest secret, a powerful technology that enables to choose the optimal core up to 100 times faster. Frenetic Core OptimizerTM is a new tool integrated in the online platform, capable of comparing results in a matter of seconds.

Frenetic, the Spanish tech company born to change the Power Electronics industry, launches the latest version of their online platform. Its novelty is the Frenetic Core OptimizerTM, ready to solve some of the problems that engineers face every day.

RelatedPosts

Designing a USB Type‑C Flyback Planar Transformer with Frenetic’s Planar Tool

Designing a Custom Core Transformer for 10 kW LLC Data Center Power Stages

Magnetics Design in High‑Frequency GaN Converters

Every Power Electronics engineer knows how long it takes to make decisions in the magnetics designs process, especially with the core selection, that determines the size and price of the final product. Those more experienced already have their own algorithms implemented in a calculation program or an Excel sheet. However, it is difficult to include new variables, such as new materials, and sometimes they must restart all the process when moving to a different project. Those with less experience in the field must do all the necessary lab experiments to create their own method, together with a design system.

Currently, the best engineers around the world are using Frenetic Online for choosing the most suitable option for their components in the shortest period. In the last few years, through the Frenetic online platform, hundreds of companies have designed and manufactured samples of their most complex components, decreasing the size up to 3 times compared to their previous solution, and securing the supply chain, even under the current circumstances. This experience has built a consolidated team of engineers with the necessary knowledge to implement solutions based on the scientific method.

In the words of Dr. Chema Molina, CEO of the company: “At Frenetic, we have always worked to empower our users and make their work more effective. After years of experience with some of the best manufacturers worldwide, covering very specific needs, we have been able to learn from our successes and experiences. Today, we can finally provide our customers with this knowledge to use in the decision-making process and turn the design and manufacturing procedure even more efficient.”

Figure 1 – Frenetic Core Optimizer TM Ve vs.N turns.
Figure 2 – Frenetic Core Optimizer TM Core Losses vs.N turns Chart

Frenetic has therefore released the Core OptimizerTM, result of the application of the scientific method in the design of high frequency magnetics. This new tool comes from the necessity of having a feature based on Frenetic’s laboratory experienced that enables the users to have much more accurate results and with less iterations.

The Core OptimizerTM, already available on Frenetic online, provides the most accurate results within just a few seconds, supporting the engineers when selecting the optimal core for the magnetics component. During the design process, after the introduction of the specific waveform and losses target, the engineer only has to select the Core OptimizerTM tab and start comparing all cores in a family by the turns needed, and core by core, until the optimal core is found.

Related

Source: Frenetic

Recent Posts

August 2026 Interconnect, Passives and Electromechanical Components Market Insights

4.9.2026
6

Vishay Extends High-Current Common-Mode Chokes with 30 A EMI Filtering up to 150 °C

3.9.2026
14

B–H Curve-Based Inductor Modelling in LTspice: A Current-Dependent Magnetic Model

31.8.2026
34

Vishay IFBT SMT Flyback Transformers Target PoE and Isolated DC/DC Designs up to 30 W

28.8.2026
20

Bourns Automotive BMS Signal Transformer Combines Reinforced Isolation and Common-Mode Noise Rejection

27.8.2026
27

Vishay Introduces Automotive Low Loss SMD Common-Mode Chokes

26.8.2026
33

Current-Dependent Inductors: Using Non-Linear Inductance in Buck Converters and PFC Stages

24.8.2026
43

Passive Components for Industrial Automation and Robotics (Dossier Report 08/26)

20.8.2026
125

Single Pair Ethernet for Humanoid Robot In-Robot Networks

17.8.2026
179

Upcoming Events

Sep 10
11:00 - 12:00 CEST

Equipment models and model strategies for Space Missions

Sep 16
17:00 - 18:00 CEST

Designing a 5 kW, 800 V-to-50 V PSFB Converter for Next-Generation Data Centers

Sep 29
16:00 - 17:00 CEST

Cybersecurity 2026

View Calendar

Popular Posts

  • Buck Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • LLC Resonant Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Boost Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Earthing Systems and IEC Classification Explained

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • MLCC and Ceramic Capacitors

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Flyback Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Capacitor Charging and Discharging

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Audio Capacitors: Choosing Capacitors for Crossover Circuits

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Resistor Symbols

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Thermistors Basics, NTC and PTC Thermistors

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Newsletter Subscription

 

Passive Components Blog

© 2015–2026
All rights reserved

  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • EPCI Membership & Advertisement
  • About

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Knowledge Blog
  • Dossiers
  • PCNS

© 2015–2026
All rights reserved