Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • NewsFilter
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest

    Binder Hybrid Connector Simplifies One Cable Automation

    Tapped Inductor Buck Converter Fundamentals

    TAIYO YUDEN Releases Mini Metal Power Inductors

    Molecular Memristor Shows Record 145 kH Emergent Inductance

    Planar vs Conventional Transformer: When it Make Sense

    Researchers Propose Next‑Gen Compact Memory Using Ultra-thin Ferroelectric Capacitors

    Nichicon ADN Automotive Hybrid Aluminum Capacitors Now Available in EMEA

    Wk 19 Electronics Supply Chain Digest

    Electrocaloric Multilayer Capacitors: Towards Quiet, Solid‑State Cooling Around Room Temperature

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • VideoFilter
    • All
    • Antenna videos
    • Capacitor videos
    • Circuit Protection Video
    • Filter videos
    • Fuse videos
    • Inductor videos
    • Inter-Connect Video
    • Non-linear passives videos
    • Oscillator videos
    • Passive sensors videos
    • Resistor videos

    Tapped Inductor Buck Converter Fundamentals

    Planar vs Conventional Transformer: When it Make Sense

    Modeling Fringing Field Losses in Inductors & Transformers

    Why Power Inductors Use a Ferrite Core With an Air Gap

    Transformer-Based Power-Line Harvester Magnetic Design

    Thermal Modeling of Magnetics

    Standard vs Planar LLC transformers Comparison for Battery Chargers

    How Modern Tools Model Magnetic Components for Power Electronics

    Advanced Loss Modeling for Planar Magnetics in the Frenetic Planar Tool

    Trending Tags

    • Capacitors explained
    • Inductors explained
    • Resistors explained
    • Filters explained
    • Application Video Guidelines
    • EMC
    • New Products
    • Ripple Current
    • Simulation
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
  • Knowledge Blog
  • DossiersNew
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • PCNS
    • PCNS 2025
    • PCNS 2023
    • PCNS 2021
    • PCNS 2019
    • PCNS 2017
  • Events
  • Home
  • NewsFilter
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest

    Binder Hybrid Connector Simplifies One Cable Automation

    Tapped Inductor Buck Converter Fundamentals

    TAIYO YUDEN Releases Mini Metal Power Inductors

    Molecular Memristor Shows Record 145 kH Emergent Inductance

    Planar vs Conventional Transformer: When it Make Sense

    Researchers Propose Next‑Gen Compact Memory Using Ultra-thin Ferroelectric Capacitors

    Nichicon ADN Automotive Hybrid Aluminum Capacitors Now Available in EMEA

    Wk 19 Electronics Supply Chain Digest

    Electrocaloric Multilayer Capacitors: Towards Quiet, Solid‑State Cooling Around Room Temperature

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • VideoFilter
    • All
    • Antenna videos
    • Capacitor videos
    • Circuit Protection Video
    • Filter videos
    • Fuse videos
    • Inductor videos
    • Inter-Connect Video
    • Non-linear passives videos
    • Oscillator videos
    • Passive sensors videos
    • Resistor videos

    Tapped Inductor Buck Converter Fundamentals

    Planar vs Conventional Transformer: When it Make Sense

    Modeling Fringing Field Losses in Inductors & Transformers

    Why Power Inductors Use a Ferrite Core With an Air Gap

    Transformer-Based Power-Line Harvester Magnetic Design

    Thermal Modeling of Magnetics

    Standard vs Planar LLC transformers Comparison for Battery Chargers

    How Modern Tools Model Magnetic Components for Power Electronics

    Advanced Loss Modeling for Planar Magnetics in the Frenetic Planar Tool

    Trending Tags

    • Capacitors explained
    • Inductors explained
    • Resistors explained
    • Filters explained
    • Application Video Guidelines
    • EMC
    • New Products
    • Ripple Current
    • Simulation
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
  • Knowledge Blog
  • DossiersNew
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • PCNS
    • PCNS 2025
    • PCNS 2023
    • PCNS 2021
    • PCNS 2019
    • PCNS 2017
  • Events
No Result
View All Result
Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result

MLCC Manufacturers Consider Price Increase as AI Demand Outpaces Supply

18.2.2026
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A

AI server demand is rapidly absorbing high‑end MLCC capacity and manufacturers are considering price increase of the high end MLCC capacitors needed for these applications.

AI server demand: from forecast to capacity stress

The MLCC industry has been discussing the impact of AI servers on capacitor demand for several years, but 2025–2026 is when this demand is visibly stressing available high‑end capacity. Murata has highlighted that AI‑server‑related MLCC demand is on track for a strong double‑digit CAGR toward 2030, driven by the much higher MLCC counts per accelerator board and per rack compared with conventional servers.

RelatedPosts

Murata Introduces Crystal and NTC Set for Automotive UWB Timing

Murata New MLCC Bulk Case Packaging Cuts Packaging Material by 99%

Murata Automotive MLCCs Push Capacitance Limits for ADAS and Power Lines

An AI accelerator board can easily integrate tens of thousands of MLCCs across point‑of‑load converters, decoupling networks and auxiliary circuits, and a fully populated AI rack multiplies this into the hundreds of thousands of units. This is not just a volume story: data‑center power‑delivery networks favor high‑CV, low‑ESR MLCCs with tight tolerances, which are precisely the segments where effective capacity is hardest to expand quickly.

In recent comments, Murata president Norio Nakajima confirmed that the company has started internal discussions about raising prices for its more advanced MLCCs used in AI servers. Demand from AI data centers is so strong that it is increasingly difficult to match it with existing capacity while also supporting other strategic markets.

At the same time, Murata emphasizes that it is still in the process of gauging the “true demand” profile for AI infrastructure. The company wants better visibility into whether current order momentum is sustainable, or whether there is a risk of a short‑term spike followed by digestion. As of mid‑February 2026, this means that a decision on specific price actions is pending, and there is no formal corporate notice detailing MLCC price revisions.

Spot MLCC prices already moving

Even without an official Murata list‑price change, the broader MLCC market is already showing the typical symptoms of a tightening cycle. Industry reports from Korea and other regions indicate that spot prices for certain MLCC categories have risen by up to roughly 20% in early 2026, led by high‑grade parts for AI, industrial and automotive applications.

Production line utilization for high‑end MLCCs at leading suppliers is reported to be running at very high levels, effectively close to full for some high‑CV and high‑reliability product segments. At the same time, major manufacturers have remained cautious about adding large new bricks‑and‑mortar capacity after the last boom–bust cycle. The result is a more measured capacity response, where incremental debottlenecking is favored over aggressive greenfield expansions, and where pricing has more room to firm when demand concentrates in specific, higher‑value niches.

What this means for MLCC users in AI and beyond

For OEMs, Tier‑1s and EMS providers, the combination of doubled inquiries, high utilization and rising spot prices suggests that contractual MLCC pricing for high‑end AI‑server parts is likely to come under upward pressure over the next few quarters. Designs that depend on advanced high‑CV MLCCs for GPU/accelerator power rails, VRMs and board‑level decoupling will be particularly exposed.

From a design‑in and supply‑chain perspective, several measures become advisable:

  • Review second‑source options and footprint flexibility for critical MLCC positions in AI and server platforms.
  • Engage early with distributors and manufacturers to secure allocations and forecast commitments for data‑center‑grade MLCCs.
  • Consider the total cost of ownership of power‑delivery architectures, as incremental improvements in layout or derating can sometimes reduce the absolute MLCC count in hot spots.

For other sectors—automotive, industrial, and consumer—the immediate impact will depend on product mix. Commodity, low‑capacitance MLCCs may remain relatively stable, while high‑CV and special‑construction parts (high temperature, high voltage, high reliability) can see knock‑on effects as capacity is prioritized toward AI‑server demand. The MLCC market is effectively splitting between high‑end segments with structural tightness and more commoditized ranges where pricing remains more competitive.

For the passive components community, AI servers are becoming a key structural driver that interacts with existing trends in automotive electrification and industrial digitalization. Even if Murata ultimately adopts a gradual approach to list‑price adjustments, the signal to the market is clear: high‑end MLCCs for AI infrastructure should be treated as strategic components, with corresponding attention to design, qualification and supply‑chain planning.

References

  1. Digitimes – “AI server MLCC orders double capacity; Murata considers price increase,” February 18, 2026.
  2. Bloomberg – “Murata Explores Raising Prices of Key AI Server Component,” February 17, 2026.
  3. Meyka – “Murata Manufacturing Stock Today, February 18: MLCC Price Hike Talks on AI Boom,” February 17, 2026.
  4. Investing.com – “Murata raises MLCC growth forecast for AI servers to 30% CAGR,” December 2, 2025.
  5. Biz Chosun – “AI server boom drives MLCC prices higher as Murata, Samsung split …,” February 7, 2026.
  6. Market and distributor commentary on MLCC spot price increases and supply tightness, early 2026

Related

Recent Posts

Researchers Propose Next‑Gen Compact Memory Using Ultra-thin Ferroelectric Capacitors

11.5.2026
28

Nichicon ADN Automotive Hybrid Aluminum Capacitors Now Available in EMEA

11.5.2026
22

Electrocaloric Multilayer Capacitors: Towards Quiet, Solid‑State Cooling Around Room Temperature

7.5.2026
184

European Components Distribution Shows Strong Q1 2026 Growth Amid Geopolitical Uncertainty

7.5.2026
70

KYOCERA 10 µF 0201 MLCC Brings High‑Capacitance into Mobile Designs

6.5.2026
52

Energy Localization in Tantalum Anode Formation: A Structural Perspective

4.5.2026
46

YAGEO Introduces C0G Flexible Termination Automotive MLCCs

30.4.2026
41

YMIN Introduces Polymer Tantalum Capacitors for AI Server SSDs

29.4.2026
93

DigiKey Adds 31k New In‑Stock Parts in Q1 2026

29.4.2026
16

Upcoming Events

May 13
17:00 - 17:30 CEST

Winding Loss Modeling for Toroidal Magnetics – Including Gapped Cores

May 19
16:00 - 17:00 CEST

Designing Qi2 Wireless Power Systems: Practical Development and EMC Optimization

Jun 2
16:00 - 17:00 CEST

Calculation, Simulation and Measurement of 800V EMC Filters

View Calendar

Popular Posts

  • Buck Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Boost Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Flyback Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • LLC Resonant Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • MLCC and Ceramic Capacitors

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Dual Active Bridge (DAB) Topology

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • What Electronics Engineer Needs to Know About Passive Low Pass Filters

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Capacitor Charging and Discharging

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Ripple Current and its Effects on the Performance of Capacitors

    3 shares
    Share 3 Tweet 0
  • MLCC Case Sizes Standards Explained

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Newsletter Subscription

 

Passive Components Blog

© EPCI - Leading Passive Components Educational and Information Site

  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • EPCI Membership & Advertisement
  • About

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Knowledge Blog
  • PCNS

© EPCI - Leading Passive Components Educational and Information Site

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.
Go to mobile version