Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • NewsFilter
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest

    VINATech Offers Smallest 100µF Al-Hybrid Capacitor

    Vishay Unveils SMD 1200V PTC Thermistors in Compact Size

    Power Inductors Future: Minimal Losses and Compact Designs

    Bourns Unveils Automotive 3 Watt Gate Driver Transformer

    Murata Opens EMC Test Lab in Nuremberg to Enhance Automotive Support

    Percolation Phenomenon: Degradation of Molded Power Inductors in DC/DC Converters

    Molex Acquires Smiths Interconnect

    Murata Integrates Component Models into Cadence EDA Tools

    Wk 42 Electronics Supply Chain Digest

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • VideoFilter
    • All
    • Antenna videos
    • Capacitor videos
    • Circuit Protection Video
    • Filter videos
    • Fuse videos
    • Inductor videos
    • Inter-Connect Video
    • Non-linear passives videos
    • Oscillator videos
    • Passive sensors videos
    • Resistor videos

    Power Inductors Future: Minimal Losses and Compact Designs

    Percolation Phenomenon: Degradation of Molded Power Inductors in DC/DC Converters

    Connector PCB Design Challenges

    Efficient Power Converters: Duty Cycle vs Conduction Losses

    Ripple Steering in Coupled Inductors: SEPIC Case

    SEPIC Converter with Coupled and Uncoupled Inductors

    Coupled Inductors in SEPIC versus Flyback Converters

    Non-Linear MLCC Class II Capacitor Measurements Challenges

    Percolation Phenomenon and Reliability of Molded Power Inductors in DC/DC converters

    Trending Tags

    • Capacitors explained
    • Inductors explained
    • Resistors explained
    • Filters explained
    • Application Video Guidelines
    • EMC
    • New Products
    • Ripple Current
    • Simulation
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
  • Knowledge Blog
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • PCNS
    • PCNS 2025
    • PCNS 2023
    • PCNS 2021
    • PCNS 2019
    • PCNS 2017
  • Events
  • Home
  • NewsFilter
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest

    VINATech Offers Smallest 100µF Al-Hybrid Capacitor

    Vishay Unveils SMD 1200V PTC Thermistors in Compact Size

    Power Inductors Future: Minimal Losses and Compact Designs

    Bourns Unveils Automotive 3 Watt Gate Driver Transformer

    Murata Opens EMC Test Lab in Nuremberg to Enhance Automotive Support

    Percolation Phenomenon: Degradation of Molded Power Inductors in DC/DC Converters

    Molex Acquires Smiths Interconnect

    Murata Integrates Component Models into Cadence EDA Tools

    Wk 42 Electronics Supply Chain Digest

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • VideoFilter
    • All
    • Antenna videos
    • Capacitor videos
    • Circuit Protection Video
    • Filter videos
    • Fuse videos
    • Inductor videos
    • Inter-Connect Video
    • Non-linear passives videos
    • Oscillator videos
    • Passive sensors videos
    • Resistor videos

    Power Inductors Future: Minimal Losses and Compact Designs

    Percolation Phenomenon: Degradation of Molded Power Inductors in DC/DC Converters

    Connector PCB Design Challenges

    Efficient Power Converters: Duty Cycle vs Conduction Losses

    Ripple Steering in Coupled Inductors: SEPIC Case

    SEPIC Converter with Coupled and Uncoupled Inductors

    Coupled Inductors in SEPIC versus Flyback Converters

    Non-Linear MLCC Class II Capacitor Measurements Challenges

    Percolation Phenomenon and Reliability of Molded Power Inductors in DC/DC converters

    Trending Tags

    • Capacitors explained
    • Inductors explained
    • Resistors explained
    • Filters explained
    • Application Video Guidelines
    • EMC
    • New Products
    • Ripple Current
    • Simulation
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
  • Knowledge Blog
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • PCNS
    • PCNS 2025
    • PCNS 2023
    • PCNS 2021
    • PCNS 2019
    • PCNS 2017
  • Events
No Result
View All Result
Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result

Benefits of Tantalum Powder Stress–Strain Curve Evaluation vs Conventional Wet Test

3.10.2025
Reading Time: 8 mins read
A A

Dr. Vladimir Azbel, an independent consultant on tantalum capacitors, presents a tantalum powder mechanical testing methodology in this paper. This methodology utilizes stress–strain curve (SSC) parameters and the Δσ benchmark as an alternative to the conventional Wet Test for inspecting tantalum powder. The goal is to enhance the yield and reliability of tantalum capacitors. 

Introduction

The Wet Test measures electrical characteristics (capacitance and leakage current) but fails to capture structural factors responsible for long-term reliability.

RelatedPosts

Reliability of Tantalum Capacitors: the Role of Internal Stress

Influence of Tantalum Capacitor Pellets Size on Stability During Oxide Film Formation

Enhanced Process Control in Tantalum Capacitor Anode Manufacturing Reduces Cost and Improves Reliability

By analyzing the relative change in yield strength before and after annealing (Δσ), internal stresses within porous anodes can be quantified. Δσ directly reflects structural stability and serves as an objective, reproducible indicator of aging tendency.

The method enables early differentiation of stable from problematic powder lots and provides predictive insight into long-term performance.

The Wet Test is traditionally applied for the incoming inspection of tantalum powders. The evaluation criterion involves comparing capacitance (C) and direct current leakage (DCL) of anodes fabricated according to a standard recipe with results obtained from previously qualified powder lots of the same grade.

  • Capacitance and morphology: Capacitance is determined by pore surface area, which can be achieved with different morphologies. However, it is directly related to the primary particle size distribution, which is difficult to verify because the powder is typically supplied in an agglomerated form.
  • DCL and internal stresses: DCL stability depends on internal stresses formed during the growth of the amorphous Ta2O5 film. These stresses arise from both the exothermic oxidation reaction and the mismatch in thermal expansion coefficients between Ta and Ta2O5.
  • Neck size distribution: Neck size distribution between particles plays a decisive role. It determines whether stresses can relax during oxide growth or accumulate, leading to defects and degradation.

Problem statement

Currently, tantalum capacitor manufacturers do not mandatory request the primary particle size distribution curve, even though it is the key determinant of porosity. As a result, capacitance can be reproduced with different morphologies. However, non-uniform porosity leads to variation in neck sizes, which in turn increases DCL variability and decreases overall reliability.

Mechanical alternative: stress–strain curve and Δσ benchmark

To overcome these limitations, a mechanical testing method has been introduced based on the analysis of stress–strain curve (SSC) parameters and the Δσ benchmark. This approach was adapted from studies on the aging of heat-resistant materials.

Definition of Δσ

Δσ denotes the relative change in yield strength before and after annealing, as obtained from the stress–strain curve. It originates from the relaxation of internal stresses locked within the porous structure during thermal treatment.

If an anode contains substantial internal stresses—arising from variations in the granulometric composition of primary particles, pressing conditions, insufficient mixing, or temperature gradients during sintering—structural rearrangements occur during annealing. These changes manifest as a shift in yield strength. Consequently, Δσ directly reflects structural stability.

Principle of the method

  • Low Δσ: Minimal internal stresses, stable structure, negligible risk of aging, and very low failure probability.
  • High Δσ: Significant internal stresses, pronounced aging processes, structural degradation, and elevated DCL.

Thus, Δσ serves as a reliable indicator of the material’s tendency toward aging.

Structural information from the SSC curve

  • Yield strength: Indicates the average neck size between particles, enabling monitoring of morphology within a given powder grade.
  • Elastic modulus: Reflects the overall porosity of the material.
  • Strain-hardening coefficient: Characterizes defect density and the level of residual stresses.

Comparison of the SSC curve of a new powder lot with a benchmark allows early assessment of structural quality and suitability. Nevertheless, Δσ remains the most reliable quantitative criterion.

Practical implementation

For incoming inspection, benchmarks are established for both the stress–strain curve and Δσ. These benchmarks are determined once using a qualified powder lot and subsequently serve as reference values for all future lots of the same grade. The same methodology can be applied to monitor ongoing production batches of anodes.

Experimental Validation

Experiment 1. Δσ as a predictor of DCL stability when electrical tests show no difference

To test the predictive capability of the proposed method, tantalum capacitor samples of identical design, manufactured with the same technological process from five different powder lots, were investigated. The powder grade was 50kCV from two leading suppliers.

All five lots successfully passed conventional electrical evaluation (Wet Test, Silver Check, Final Test, Life Test). Electrical test data are summarized in Table 1, where no substantial differences can be observed at the early inspection stages. Notably, press pellets from all batches were sintered in the same furnace run.

Experiment results

  • Early tests: Wet Check, Silver Check, and Final Test values were essentially the same across all lots (see Table 1).
  • End-of-life behavior: Significant differences appeared in end-of-life DCL (2000 h test), reflected in the number of rejects.
LotWet DCL (µA)Silver DCL (µA)EOL DCL (µA)Electrical yield (%) / Rejects
11.872.124.9495.83 / 0+2+0
22.729.616.2977.33 / 4+2+2
31.514.635.8195.73 / 4+1+1
42.254.554.1275.17 / 0
52.153.154.8276.18 / 1+0+0
Table 1. Electrical test summary across five lots

Δσ calculation

For the corresponding anodes, yield strength was determined before annealing (σy,i) and after annealing at 450 °C in air (σy,a). The relative change Δσ was calculated as:

Equation: Δσ% = (σy,i − σy,a) / σy,i × 100

Figure 1. Dependence of the number of failures in the DCL TC (%) that have passed LT, on Δσ%.

The correlation between Δσ and the reject rate demonstrated that lots with higher Δσ values exhibited higher failure probability, despite indistinguishable results in the standard electrical tests. This confirms that Δσ can serve as an early and reliable indicator of structural instability and long-term degradation risk.

Experiment 2. Identification of problematic batches via mechanical parameters

During subsequent production, new batches from the same powder grade exhibited unexpectedly high leakage currents already at the incoming inspection stage. Certificates indicated all parameters within specifications, and for more than 40 previous batches of the same powder, no such issues had been observed.

Comparative data for acceptable (40 lots) and problematic (5 lots) batches are summarized in Table 2, showing differences in carbon content, shrinkage, and DCL behavior.

Table 2, Differences in carbon content, shrinkage, and DCL behavior in tantalum powder batches

Since the powders were nominally identical and pressed under the same recipe, a detailed mechanical analysis was conducted using stress–strain curves. The key mechanical parameters—yield strength, elastic modulus, and strain-hardening coefficient—were extracted.

Figure 2. Stress–strain curves for acceptable and problematic lots.

The stress–strain curves revealed that in the problematic lots, the yield strength was approximately 30% lower compared to the acceptable ones (see Figure 2). Yield strength is proportional to average neck size between particles. A reduction in neck size under the same formation voltage increases internal stresses already at the forming stage, thereby predisposing the material to high leakage currents and reduced reliability.

Final remarks

The two presented case studies clearly demonstrate that mechanical testing provides critical information inaccessible through traditional Wet Test evaluation. In Experiment 1, Δσ successfully predicted long-term DCL degradation in cases where all electrical tests initially showed no differences. In Experiment 2, mechanical analysis of stress–strain parameters revealed the root cause of high leakage currents in newly supplied batches, even though the supplier data met specifications.

Thus, Δσ and related SSC parameters not only complement electrical testing but also serve as indispensable tools for early detection of problematic powder lots and prediction of their long-term reliability.

Conclusion

In summary, Δσ provides an objective and reproducible reliability criterion, enabling early differentiation between stable and problematic powder lots. Unlike the Wet Test, which captures only instantaneous electrical parameters, the Δσ-based approach reveals the underlying structural state and allows prediction of its long-term evolution. This makes it a powerful tool for ensuring the reliability of capacitor-grade tantalum powders.

To further substantiate the method, two experimental case studies were conducted. They demonstrate how mechanical parameters (in particular yield strength and Δσ) can provide critical insights even in situations where electrical testing shows no deviations, or where unexpected DCL problems arise in new batches.

Related

Source: Vladimir Azbel

Recent Posts

VINATech Offers Smallest 100µF Al-Hybrid Capacitor

23.10.2025
2

Murata Integrates Component Models into Cadence EDA Tools

21.10.2025
24

High Energy Density Polymer Film Capacitors via Molecular and Interfacial Design

15.10.2025
25

KYOCERA AVX Expands Stacked MLCC Capacitors Offering

14.10.2025
41

Silicon Capacitors Market: Shaping the Foundation for Next-Gen Miniaturization Electronics

10.10.2025
74

Enhancing Energy Density in Nanocomposite Dielectric Capacitors

9.10.2025
41

Advances in the Environmental Performance of Polymer Capacitors

8.10.2025
68

Vishay Releases DLA Tantalum Polymer Capacitors for Military and Aerospace

8.10.2025
34

Paumanok Releases Capacitor Foils Market Report 2025-2030

7.10.2025
30

Modelithics Welcomes CapV as a Sponsoring MVP

7.10.2025
5

Upcoming Events

Oct 20
October 20 - October 23

Digital WE Days 2025 – Virtual Conference

Oct 21
October 21 @ 12:00 - October 23 @ 14:15 EDT

Space and Military Standards for Hybrids and RF Microwave Modules

Oct 28
8:00 - 15:00 CET

Power Up Your Design: SN6507 and the Ready-to-Use Development Kit

View Calendar

Popular Posts

  • Buck Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Boost Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • LLC Resonant Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Flyback Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Ripple Current and its Effects on the Performance of Capacitors

    3 shares
    Share 3 Tweet 0
  • What is a Dielectric Constant and DF of Plastic Materials?

    4 shares
    Share 4 Tweet 0
  • SEPIC Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • MLCC and Ceramic Capacitors

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Dual Active Bridge (DAB) Topology

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Flying Capacitors

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Newsletter Subscription

 

Passive Components Blog

© EPCI - Leading Passive Components Educational and Information Site

  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • EPCI Membership & Advertisement
  • About

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Knowledge Blog
  • PCNS

© EPCI - Leading Passive Components Educational and Information Site

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.
Go to mobile version