Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • NewsFilter
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest
    Researchers developed a polymer capacitor by combining two cheap, commercially available plastics. The new polymer capacitor makes use of the transparent material — pictured here, with vintage Penn State athletic marks visible through it — to store four times the energy and withstand significantly more heat.  Credit: Penn State

    Penn State Demonstrated Polymer Alloy Capacitor Film with 4× Energy Density up to 250C

    ECIA January 2026 Reports Strong Sales Confidence

    Vishay Unveils Ultra-Compact 0201 Thick Film Chip Resistors

    Würth Elektronik Component Data Live in Accuris

    Coilcraft Releases Automotive Common Mode Chokes

    MLCC Manufacturers Consider Price Increase as AI Demand Outpaces Supply

    YAGEO Extends Antenna Portfolio with Wi‑Fi 6E/7 and Tri‑band GNSS Solutions

    SCHURTER Introduces 2410 SMD Fuse for Robust AC/DC Protection

    TDK Releases High Temp 175C Automotive NTC thermistors

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • VideoFilter
    • All
    • Antenna videos
    • Capacitor videos
    • Circuit Protection Video
    • Filter videos
    • Fuse videos
    • Inductor videos
    • Inter-Connect Video
    • Non-linear passives videos
    • Oscillator videos
    • Passive sensors videos
    • Resistor videos

    2026 Power Magnetics Design Trends: Flyback, DAB and Planar

    Enabling Software‑Defined Vehicle Architectures: Automotive Ethernet and Zonal Smart Power

    Calculating Resistance Value of a Flyback RC Snubber 

    One‑Pulse Characterization of Nonlinear Power Inductors

    Thermistor Linearization Challenges

    Coaxial Connectors and How to Connect with PCB

    PCB Manufacturing, Test Methods, Quality and Reliability

    Transformer Behavior – Current Transfer and Hidden Feedback

    Choosing the Right Capacitor: The Importance of Accurate Measurements

    Trending Tags

    • Capacitors explained
    • Inductors explained
    • Resistors explained
    • Filters explained
    • Application Video Guidelines
    • EMC
    • New Products
    • Ripple Current
    • Simulation
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
  • Knowledge Blog
  • DossiersNew
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • PCNS
    • PCNS 2025
    • PCNS 2023
    • PCNS 2021
    • PCNS 2019
    • PCNS 2017
  • Events
  • Home
  • NewsFilter
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest
    Researchers developed a polymer capacitor by combining two cheap, commercially available plastics. The new polymer capacitor makes use of the transparent material — pictured here, with vintage Penn State athletic marks visible through it — to store four times the energy and withstand significantly more heat.  Credit: Penn State

    Penn State Demonstrated Polymer Alloy Capacitor Film with 4× Energy Density up to 250C

    ECIA January 2026 Reports Strong Sales Confidence

    Vishay Unveils Ultra-Compact 0201 Thick Film Chip Resistors

    Würth Elektronik Component Data Live in Accuris

    Coilcraft Releases Automotive Common Mode Chokes

    MLCC Manufacturers Consider Price Increase as AI Demand Outpaces Supply

    YAGEO Extends Antenna Portfolio with Wi‑Fi 6E/7 and Tri‑band GNSS Solutions

    SCHURTER Introduces 2410 SMD Fuse for Robust AC/DC Protection

    TDK Releases High Temp 175C Automotive NTC thermistors

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • VideoFilter
    • All
    • Antenna videos
    • Capacitor videos
    • Circuit Protection Video
    • Filter videos
    • Fuse videos
    • Inductor videos
    • Inter-Connect Video
    • Non-linear passives videos
    • Oscillator videos
    • Passive sensors videos
    • Resistor videos

    2026 Power Magnetics Design Trends: Flyback, DAB and Planar

    Enabling Software‑Defined Vehicle Architectures: Automotive Ethernet and Zonal Smart Power

    Calculating Resistance Value of a Flyback RC Snubber 

    One‑Pulse Characterization of Nonlinear Power Inductors

    Thermistor Linearization Challenges

    Coaxial Connectors and How to Connect with PCB

    PCB Manufacturing, Test Methods, Quality and Reliability

    Transformer Behavior – Current Transfer and Hidden Feedback

    Choosing the Right Capacitor: The Importance of Accurate Measurements

    Trending Tags

    • Capacitors explained
    • Inductors explained
    • Resistors explained
    • Filters explained
    • Application Video Guidelines
    • EMC
    • New Products
    • Ripple Current
    • Simulation
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
  • Knowledge Blog
  • DossiersNew
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • PCNS
    • PCNS 2025
    • PCNS 2023
    • PCNS 2021
    • PCNS 2019
    • PCNS 2017
  • Events
No Result
View All Result
Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result

How to choose a surface-mount inductor for a DC/DC converter

24.8.2022
Reading Time: 6 mins read
A A

Source: Electronic Products, Signal Transformer article

Understanding the basics of the switch-mode converter principle will help designers select the best inductor for their application. By Mitchell Rhine, director of engineering, Signal Transformer.

RelatedPosts

Integrated Bulk Acoustic Wave (BAW) Technology Explained – Texas Instruments and Mouser Electronics EE Journal Chalk Talk Video

Würth Elektronik Introduces Robust, Resilient, Mountable Radio Interference Suppression Choke

What is RFID? How RFID works? RFID Explained in Detail

Traditional linear voltage regulators have one major drawback: The voltage dropped across the pass transistor multiplied by the load current equals wasted power. The preferred option is often a switch-mode DC/DC converter, wherein the power transistors are continuously switching with a duty cycle that, with some additional filtering, delivers the required output voltage.

In this configuration, the transistor is either ON, involving no voltage drop, or OFF with no current passing. This means that the power dissipation tends to go down to zero when switching between states, yielding an efficiency of up to 95%, while linear converters typically deliver about 50%. Switching converters have another major advantage in that their topology means that they can operate in step-down (so-called “buck,”), step-up (“boost”), or invert (“buck-boost”) modes.

A basic understanding of the switch-mode converter principle is helpful in selecting the inductor required. This article will focus on just a few basic configurations, primarily on the very popular fixed-frequency buck converter operated in “continuous mode.”

Fig. 1: A simple switching DC/DC converter.

A basic buck converter consists of just a switch, inductor, capacitor, and diode (Fig. 1). Assuming an ideal switch and diode, Vsw = 0 and Vd = 0, simplifies the explanation of the converter’s operation. In a real-world design case, to accurately determine the required inductance value L, the expected duty cycle D, and operating efficiency, Vsw and Vd have to be considered non-zero, and their effect on the converter circuit must be included.

When the switch is ON, the diode is off and a ramping current flows directly from input to output. When the switch is OFF, the voltage across the inductor reverses polarity due to its inductance attempting to keep the current flowing. This will turn on the “catch” diode, and this causes the current to ramp down until the switch turns on again and the cycle repeats. The ramping ON current increases the inductor core magnetization, storing energy in the inductor, which is returned during the OFF cycle as the current ramps down.

Fig. 2: The ramping waveform of a switching DC/DC converter.

The waveform of the current flowing through the inductor in the case of a buck converter is shown in Fig. 2. It includes an average DC component and an AC component, which is periodically ramping up and down. The DC current equals the DC load current Iload. Under steady-state conditions, the inductor current at the end of the cycle equals that at the start of the cycle.

The controlled switching action results in

Vout = D * Vin                                                                                       (Equation 1)

with D being the duty cycle as D = ton /(ton + toff).

The switching frequency is determined by fsw = 1/(ton + toff), with ton = D/fsw.

Adding up all the voltage drops generated in the circuit during ON time, and assuming that Vsw = 0, this results in

Vin – Vind – Vout= 0                                                                   (Equation 2)

If we now substitute Vind = L * di/dt, with di resembling the magnitude of the current ramp Iramp and dt the ON time ton, this will get us to

L * Iramp = (Vin – Vout) * ton                                                                    (Equation 3)

This has a significant consequence because the right hand side of Equation 3 is constant for a given input-to-output voltage difference, implying the same for the resulting switching frequency and the value of ton. A larger inductance value L equals a smaller ramping current component, while smaller inductance values will lead to a larger current ramp. Driving this to the extreme, if the inductance is chosen to be very small, there may be a current ramp so large that at a low-load current condition, the total current flowing through the inductor could drop to zero for part of the switching period. This condition is called discontinuous mode.

There is another important consideration that must be kept in mind; a smaller inductance, which may be attractive in some applications, leads to a larger inductor ramp current, and this causes a higher ripple to occur on the output voltage. A large Iramp also increases the AC core losses in the inductor. As a general guideline, Iramp should be small compared to the maximum load current; this determines the inductance value L for a given system design.

Now, let’s turn to a key specification in regard to choosing the proper inductance value. It is the maximum peak current through the inductor. In steady state operation, it is

Imax = Iload_max+ Iramp/2                                                             (Equation 4)

Looking at Equation 3, it is apparent that Iramp is independent of Iload. To determine Imax, a more detailed consideration is needed as to how Iramp will vary with different values of Vin after deciding on the values of the inductor L.

Adding up all the voltage drops and with Vd = 0 during OFF time, this results in

Vind – Vout = 0                                                                           (Equation 5)

Considering Vind = L * di/dt, with di being the magnitude of the current ramp Irampand dt being the OFF time toff, leads us to

Iramp = Vout * toff/L                                                                                (Equation 6)

If Vout is constant, Iramp is at a maximum when toff is also at a maximum. This occurs when Vin is at a maximum, and this condition determines Iramp and the maximum peak inductor current (Equation 4).

With the inductance value determined and the maximum current known, this finally leads us to the selection of the appropriate inductor type. Shielded and low-EMI inductors are good choices for densely populated boards, as is the case in new IoT designs. Their advantage is that their magnetic flux is contained within the inductor body, resulting in a lower radiation impact on surrounding PCB traces and components.

As an example, Signal Transformer’s SCRH series of magnetically shielded parts are available with inductance values ranging from 1.0 µH to 180 µH, saturation currents from 0.15 A to 5.0 A, and heights from 1.9 mm to 4 mm. If a larger inductance value is required, the SCxxxxC Series offers values from 10 µH to 1 mH, with saturation currents from 0.045 A to 8 A and heights from 2.92 mm to 7.62 mm. Other series are available for high-current applications as well as unshielded inductors for highest efficiency and robust power handling that include low-profile dimensions.

featured image source: Signal Transformer

 

Related

Recent Posts

Würth Elektronik Component Data Live in Accuris

19.2.2026
5

Coilcraft Releases Automotive Common Mode Chokes

19.2.2026
2

2026 Power Magnetics Design Trends: Flyback, DAB and Planar

13.2.2026
30

Vishay Releases Compact 0806 Low‑DCR Power Inductor

5.2.2026
33

Murata Publishes Power Delivery Guide for AI Servers

4.2.2026
123

Selecting Current Sense Transformers with Würth Elektronik REDEXPERT

3.2.2026
33

Mechanical Drift Indicator of Tantalum Capacitor Anodes Degradation under Reverse Bias

3.2.2026
48

Enabling Software‑Defined Vehicle Architectures: Automotive Ethernet and Zonal Smart Power

2.2.2026
43

Calculating Resistance Value of a Flyback RC Snubber 

2.2.2026
59

Upcoming Events

Feb 24
16:00 - 17:00 CET

Mastering Galvanic Isolation: Ensuring Safety in Power Electronics

Mar 3
16:00 - 17:00 CET

Cybersecurity at the Eleventh Hour – from RED to CRA – Information and Discussion

Mar 21
All day

PSMA Capacitor Workshop 2026

View Calendar

Popular Posts

  • Buck Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Boost Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • LLC Resonant Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Flyback Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Ripple Current and its Effects on the Performance of Capacitors

    3 shares
    Share 3 Tweet 0
  • Dual Active Bridge (DAB) Topology

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • What is a Dielectric Constant and DF of Plastic Materials?

    4 shares
    Share 4 Tweet 0
  • MLCC and Ceramic Capacitors

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • 3-Phase EMI Filter Design, Simulation, Calculation and Test

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • MLCC Case Sizes Standards Explained

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Newsletter Subscription

 

Passive Components Blog

© EPCI - Leading Passive Components Educational and Information Site

  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • EPCI Membership & Advertisement
  • About

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Knowledge Blog
  • PCNS

© EPCI - Leading Passive Components Educational and Information Site

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.
Go to mobile version