Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • NewsFilter
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest

    Skeleton Supercapacitor Achieves UL‑certified 3,500 A Peak Current for AI Data Centers

    Bourns Planar Transformers for SiC and GaN Gate Driver Isolation

    100 V Hybrid Polymer Capacitor from VINA Enesol Targets 48–72 V Power Platforms

    Panasonic Releases Relays for IEC 62955 Compliant Single‑Phase EV Wallboxes

    KYOCERA AVX Releases NTN Antenna Selection Guide Brochure

    Coilcraft Releases 0402 Ferrite-Core Wirewound Chip Inductors for RF and EMI Control

    DigiKey Releases Season Two of Sustainable Futures Series

    Using a Virtual Anode Thermal Model to Evaluate Miniaturization Risk in Tantalum Capacitors

    Bourns Introduced High-Current Coupled Inductor for 48 V Hybrid and IBC Converters

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • VideoFilter
    • All
    • Antenna videos
    • Capacitor videos
    • Circuit Protection Video
    • Filter videos
    • Fuse videos
    • Inductor videos
    • Inter-Connect Video
    • Non-linear passives videos
    • Oscillator videos
    • Passive sensors videos
    • Resistor videos

    EMC‑Compliant PCB and Connector Design Guidelines

    Why Isolated DC/DC Power Supplies Fail Late, Würth Elektronik Podcast

    Designing 800 V DC EMC Filters: Calculation, Simulation and Measurement

    Current Sense Transformer Datasheet and Design‑in Guide

    Designing a USB Type‑C Flyback Planar Transformer with Frenetic’s Planar Tool

    Magnetics Design in High‑Frequency GaN Converters

    Qi2 Wireless Charging: Inductors, Capacitors and EMC Filters

    Two‑capacitor paradox explained for engineers

    Capacitances of Nonlinear MLCCs: What Datasheets Don’t Tell You

    Trending Tags

    • Capacitors explained
    • Inductors explained
    • Resistors explained
    • Filters explained
    • Application Video Guidelines
    • EMC
    • New Products
    • Ripple Current
    • Simulation
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
  • Knowledge Blog
  • DossiersNew
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • PCNS
    • PCNS 2025
    • PCNS 2023
    • PCNS 2021
    • PCNS 2019
    • PCNS 2017
  • Events
  • Home
  • NewsFilter
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest

    Skeleton Supercapacitor Achieves UL‑certified 3,500 A Peak Current for AI Data Centers

    Bourns Planar Transformers for SiC and GaN Gate Driver Isolation

    100 V Hybrid Polymer Capacitor from VINA Enesol Targets 48–72 V Power Platforms

    Panasonic Releases Relays for IEC 62955 Compliant Single‑Phase EV Wallboxes

    KYOCERA AVX Releases NTN Antenna Selection Guide Brochure

    Coilcraft Releases 0402 Ferrite-Core Wirewound Chip Inductors for RF and EMI Control

    DigiKey Releases Season Two of Sustainable Futures Series

    Using a Virtual Anode Thermal Model to Evaluate Miniaturization Risk in Tantalum Capacitors

    Bourns Introduced High-Current Coupled Inductor for 48 V Hybrid and IBC Converters

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • VideoFilter
    • All
    • Antenna videos
    • Capacitor videos
    • Circuit Protection Video
    • Filter videos
    • Fuse videos
    • Inductor videos
    • Inter-Connect Video
    • Non-linear passives videos
    • Oscillator videos
    • Passive sensors videos
    • Resistor videos

    EMC‑Compliant PCB and Connector Design Guidelines

    Why Isolated DC/DC Power Supplies Fail Late, Würth Elektronik Podcast

    Designing 800 V DC EMC Filters: Calculation, Simulation and Measurement

    Current Sense Transformer Datasheet and Design‑in Guide

    Designing a USB Type‑C Flyback Planar Transformer with Frenetic’s Planar Tool

    Magnetics Design in High‑Frequency GaN Converters

    Qi2 Wireless Charging: Inductors, Capacitors and EMC Filters

    Two‑capacitor paradox explained for engineers

    Capacitances of Nonlinear MLCCs: What Datasheets Don’t Tell You

    Trending Tags

    • Capacitors explained
    • Inductors explained
    • Resistors explained
    • Filters explained
    • Application Video Guidelines
    • EMC
    • New Products
    • Ripple Current
    • Simulation
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
  • Knowledge Blog
  • DossiersNew
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • PCNS
    • PCNS 2025
    • PCNS 2023
    • PCNS 2021
    • PCNS 2019
    • PCNS 2017
  • Events
No Result
View All Result
Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result

Computer Vision‑Driven Verification of Passive Component Assembly on Space‑Grade PCBs

23.9.2025
Reading Time: 7 mins read
A A

The paper “Computer Vision‑Driven Verification of Passive Component Assembly on Space‑Grade PCBs” was presented by Carmen Galán,  and Manuel Domínguez, ALTER Technology, Seville, Spain at the 5th PCNS Passive Components Networking Symposium 9-12th September 2025, Seville, Spain as paper No. AI 1.

ABSTRACT

RelatedPosts

Advances in the Environmental Performance of Polymer Capacitors

How to Manage Supercapacitors Leakage Current and Self Discharge 

Qualification of Commercial Supercapacitors for Space Applications

Passive components such as multilayer ceramic capacitors (MLCCs) and thick‑film chip resistors represent more than 70 % of the bill‑of‑materials for modern on‑board electronics. In order to ensure their reliability under extrem conditions affecting the space missions, it is essential to implement a verification programme.

This programme will analyse the solder integrity of assembled components after they have been subjected to thermal and mechanical stress. Herein, the first computer‑vision‑driven workflow concerning the European aerospace sector is presented. This system is based on the automatic analysis of the integrity of passive components and their soldering connections.

A YOLOv8‑based detector trained on 150 000 annotated microsection images identifies ten failure modes—including internal MLCC flex‑cracks and chip‑tilt resistors—with mAP50 of 0.94 and reduces analyst review time.The system has been in continuous production since Q2 2025, generating standardised ESA‑compliant reports and positioning ALTER Technology as a pioneer of AI‑enabled quality assurance for space‑grade passives.

Keywords— passive components; MLCC; chip resistor; computer vision; failure mode analysis; aerospace quality assurance

I. INTRODUCTION

Reliability of space hardware hinges on the integrity of multilayer ceramic capacitors (MLCCs), chip resistors, inductors and other passive components that dominate printed circuit board (PCB) population counts and their soldering connections. A single micro‑crack in an X7R capacitor can compromise mission‑critical power regulation, while tombstoned resistors jeopardise signal integrity. 

According to the ECSS standards, to demonstrate the reliability of assembled components, the integrity of both the component and its solder joints have to be analyse after being submitted to mechanical and thermal stress. In this way, the components are sitted for cross-section analysis by optical microscopy, a labour‑intensive process subject to operator bias. Concurrent trends toward 0201/01005 package sizes drive the need for faster, more objective inspection tools. In 2023 the Materials & Processes (M&P) Laboratory at ALTER Technology initiated an artificial‑intelligence programme to automate failure‑mode evaluation of assembled passive component after stress tests, leveraging recent advances in deep convolutional networks.

This paper presents the first computer vision-driven tool developed to assist to the laboratory inspectors in evaluating cross-section samples, harmonising results and optimising inspection time.

II. COMPUTER VISION FRAMEWORK

The workflow (Fig. 1) begins with high‑resolution imaging (0.5 µm pixel size) of resin‑embedded cross‑sectioned assembled components. A proprietary dataset of 150 000 images was curated, with expert metallographers annotating bounding boxes and segmentation masks for ten distinct failure modes. This failure modes were selected based on the anomalies describes in the standards ECSS-Q-ST-70-61C.

Data augmentation—rotation, translation, adaptive histogram equalisation, blur and synthetic noise—mitigated class imbalance and improved robustness against illumination artefacts. 

The detection backbone is Ultralytics YOLOv8‑L, initialised with MS‑COCO weights and trained for 400 epochs on dual NVIDIA  GPUs using a combined BCE‑CIoU loss. Custom anchor boxes matched the small‑object priors typical of 0201 packages. The tool was trained using anonymises metadata to ensure the independence of the results and to avoid any potential bias of the programme related with manufacturer, assembly technique…. This philosophy aslo guarantees the confidentiality and security of the results.

Figure 1. a) Crack in the solder joint of a resistor. b) crack in the ceramic body of a capacitor.

III. FAILURE MODE CATALOGUE

Table 1 summarises the passive‑component failure modes addressed by the model. Beyond conventional solder‑joint anomalies, the network recognises internal dielectric defects and mechanical damage unique to ceramic bodies. The catalogue was prioritised in consultation with component and process‑assurance (PA) engineers across six European satellites programs.

Failure modeDescriptionPrecisionRecall
Flex‑crack (MLCC)Diagonal crack across inner electrodes caused by board bending.0.950.92
DelaminationLayer separation within MLCC dielectric stack.0.940.90
Blow‑holeVoids in termination metallisation.0.930.91
TombstoningOne termination lifted, component stands vertically.0.960.94
Chip tiltComponent seated at >3° angle to PCB surface.0.940.92
Cold solder filletDull or insufficient wetting on termination.0.920.89
Lifted padCopper pad detached from PCB under component.0.910.88
Resistor hot‑spot burnLocalised overheating discoloration.0.930.90
Cracked resistor glazeSurface protective glaze fractured.0.920.87
Void under terminationSolder void >25 % under MLCC termination.0.950.91

IV. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS

The trained model achieved an overall mAP50 of 0.944 and mAP50‑95 of 0.836 on a held‑out validation subset comprising 45 000 images. Failure‑mode‑specific metrics are included in Table 1. Inference throughput is 16 fps (4 k resolution) on a single RTX A6000, enabling real‑time review during microsection polishing. The false‑negative rate decreased below 3 %. A blind verification campaign with ESA PA engineers on 300 production samples confirmed 97 % agreement between AI predictions and expert consensus.

V. DISCUSSION & INDUSTRIAL IMPACT

The proposed workflow extends beyond traditional solder‑joint inspection by providing component‑level insights crucial for derating and reliability modelling. Automated quantification of flex‑crack length, solder void area and chip tilt angle feeds directly into stress‑ strength analyses, enabling earlier rejection or rework of marginal assemblies. The system’s modular architecture supports quick retraining for novel package types—e.g., high‑voltage C0G capacitors—and is now being evaluated for wire‑bond pull‑test segmentation. ALTER Technology is coordinating a pan‑European consortium to establish a shared, anonymised defect atlas, accelerating standardisation and reinforcing Europe’s strategic autonomy in semiconductor packaging.

VI. OUTLOOK FOR PA ENGINEERS

For PA engineers, the most immediate benefit lies in the harmonisation of defect classification. Machine‑generated, timestamped reports embed annotated images and quantitative metrics, reducing subjective disagreements during board acceptance reviews. Future releases will introduce Bayesian confidence estimates, allowing risk‑based escalation paths in accordance with ECSS‑Q‑30‑11A. Integration with IPC‑1782 traceability schemas is underway, paving the path toward fully digital process assurance for passive components.

VII. CONCLUSIONS

By integrating a YOLOv8 computer‑vision detector as part of the verification solder programme for passive components on space‑grade PCBs, the ALTER Technology M&P Laboratory has achieved a transformative leap in quality assurance. This is the first operational AI‑assisted inspection line for passives in the European aerospace supply chain. The approach shortens feedback cycles, increases defect detection fidelity and opens new avenues for predictive reliability modelling.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank the European Space Agency’s Directorate of Technology, Engineering and Quality for continuous guidance.

REFERENCES

  • [1] ECSS‑Q‑ST‑70‑61C, “High‑reliability assembly for surface‑mount and through‑hole connections,” ESA, 2022.
  • [2] J. Kim et al., “Flex‑crack propagation in MLCCs during reflow,” Microelectronics Reliability, 2024.
  • [3] N. Jegham et al., “Evaluating the evolution of YOLO models,” arXiv:2411.00201, 2024.
  • [4] L. García et al., “AI‑based defect detection in ceramic capacitors,” Proceedings of ESTEC Components Day, 2025.
AI_1_ALTER Passive Component Verification_AIDownload

Related

Source: PCNS

Recent Posts

Skeleton Supercapacitor Achieves UL‑certified 3,500 A Peak Current for AI Data Centers

26.6.2026
15

100 V Hybrid Polymer Capacitor from VINA Enesol Targets 48–72 V Power Platforms

26.6.2026
22

Using a Virtual Anode Thermal Model to Evaluate Miniaturization Risk in Tantalum Capacitors

24.6.2026
29

High‑Speed Supercapacitor Balancing for AI Data Center Power Systems

23.6.2026
67

Practical Value of Structural Diagnostics for Tantalum Capacitor Anodes

22.6.2026
30

Hall-Effect Sensing for Harsh Environments: TT Electronics Selected in NASA’s Dragonfly Fan

22.6.2026
31

Stackpole Releases High-Frequency Thin Film Chip Resistors for RF up to 50 GHz

19.6.2026
28

Knowles Expands High‑Q Ceramic Core Inductors for RF designs

19.6.2026
30

TrendForce: CSP in‑house AI ASIC Boom Reshapes Capacitor Demand

18.6.2026
134

Upcoming Events

Jun 30
17:00 - 18:00 CEST

PSMA Capacitor Committee Webinar: High Voltage Pulse Capacitors

Jul 14
16:00 - 17:00 CEST

EMC Design Essentials: Mastering Varistors and Common Mode Chokes

Jul 21
16:00 - 17:00 CEST

Safety by design: X and Y Interference suppression capacitors for power line filters

View Calendar

Popular Posts

  • Boost Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Buck Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • LLC Resonant Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Flyback Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • MLCC and Ceramic Capacitors

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Nvidia Vera Rubin: Why One AI Rack Needs So Many More MLCC Capacitors

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Earthing Systems and IEC Classification Explained

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Dual Active Bridge (DAB) Topology

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • SEPIC Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • MLCC Case Sizes Standards Explained

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Newsletter Subscription

 

Passive Components Blog

© EPCI - Leading Passive Components Educational and Information Site

  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • EPCI Membership & Advertisement
  • About

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Knowledge Blog
  • Dossiers
  • PCNS

© EPCI - Leading Passive Components Educational and Information Site

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.
Go to mobile version