Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest
    ECIA Industry Pulse Q3 2026 chart showing passive components, semiconductors and electro-mechanical component market sentiment and lead-time pressure

    ECIA Industry Pulse Moderates as Passive Lead Times Tighten

    LG Innotek Demonstrates FC-BGA Substrates With Embedded Silicon Capacitors for AI Power Delivery

    On-Chip 3D-Printed Copper Microinductors: A New Route to Compact RF Electronics

    Emerging Capacitor Markets in Fusion Energy

    Murata DLW32SH_MF 1210 surface-mount common mode choke coil with metal terminals for automotive CAN FD signal-line noise suppression

    Murata Introduces Common Mode Chokes for Automotive CAN FD up to 150°C

    onsemi solid-state transformer concept for 800 V HVDC AI data center power conversion with SiC modules, DC-link capacitors and high-frequency magnetics

    Solid-State Transformers for 800 V AI Data Centers: Passive Component Design Considerations

    Littelfuse TX00AT314AMA omnipolar TMR magnetic switch sensor in a leaded TO-92-3 through-hole package

    Littelfuse Expands Omnipolar TMR Switch with Leaded TO-92 Package Option

    SCHURTER THT DIP Switches Support Hardware-Level Configuration

    TDK CN series 10 µF 100 V X7R soft-termination multilayer ceramic capacitor in 3225 EIA 1210 package

    TDK Releases 100 V Soft-Termination X7R MLCCs 10 uF in 3225 Package

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • Knowledge Blog
  • Dossiers
    • AI Hardware Dossier
    • Automotive Dossier
    • Industrial Robotics Dossier
    • Power Converter Dossier
    • Capacitor Dossier
    • Resistor Dossier
    • Inductor Dossier
    • Circuit Protection Dossier
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • PCNS
    • PCNS 2025
    • PCNS 2023
    • PCNS 2021
    • PCNS 2019
    • PCNS 2017
  • Events
  • Home
  • News
    • All
    • Aerospace & Defence
    • Antenna
    • Applications
    • Automotive
    • Capacitors
    • Circuit Protection Devices
    • electro-mechanical news
    • Filters
    • Fuses
    • Inductors
    • Industrial
    • Integrated Passives
    • inter-connect news
    • Market & Supply Chain
    • Market Insights
    • Medical
    • Modelling and Simulation
    • New Materials & Supply
    • New Technologies
    • Non-linear Passives
    • Oscillators
    • Passive Sensors News
    • Resistors
    • RF & Microwave
    • Telecommunication
    • Weekly Digest
    ECIA Industry Pulse Q3 2026 chart showing passive components, semiconductors and electro-mechanical component market sentiment and lead-time pressure

    ECIA Industry Pulse Moderates as Passive Lead Times Tighten

    LG Innotek Demonstrates FC-BGA Substrates With Embedded Silicon Capacitors for AI Power Delivery

    On-Chip 3D-Printed Copper Microinductors: A New Route to Compact RF Electronics

    Emerging Capacitor Markets in Fusion Energy

    Murata DLW32SH_MF 1210 surface-mount common mode choke coil with metal terminals for automotive CAN FD signal-line noise suppression

    Murata Introduces Common Mode Chokes for Automotive CAN FD up to 150°C

    onsemi solid-state transformer concept for 800 V HVDC AI data center power conversion with SiC modules, DC-link capacitors and high-frequency magnetics

    Solid-State Transformers for 800 V AI Data Centers: Passive Component Design Considerations

    Littelfuse TX00AT314AMA omnipolar TMR magnetic switch sensor in a leaded TO-92-3 through-hole package

    Littelfuse Expands Omnipolar TMR Switch with Leaded TO-92 Package Option

    SCHURTER THT DIP Switches Support Hardware-Level Configuration

    TDK CN series 10 µF 100 V X7R soft-termination multilayer ceramic capacitor in 3225 EIA 1210 package

    TDK Releases 100 V Soft-Termination X7R MLCCs 10 uF in 3225 Package

    Trending Tags

    • Ripple Current
    • RF
    • Leakage Current
    • Tantalum vs Ceramic
    • Snubber
    • Low ESR
    • Feedthrough
    • Derating
    • Dielectric Constant
    • New Products
    • Market Reports
  • Knowledge Blog
  • Dossiers
    • AI Hardware Dossier
    • Automotive Dossier
    • Industrial Robotics Dossier
    • Power Converter Dossier
    • Capacitor Dossier
    • Resistor Dossier
    • Inductor Dossier
    • Circuit Protection Dossier
  • Suppliers
    • Who is Who
  • PCNS
    • PCNS 2025
    • PCNS 2023
    • PCNS 2021
    • PCNS 2019
    • PCNS 2017
  • Events
No Result
View All Result
Passive Components Blog
No Result
View All Result

Understanding RS-485 Passive Fail-safe Biasing

24.8.2016
Reading Time: 8 mins read
A A

source: EDN article
Thomas Kugelstadt, Intersil Corporation -August 23, 2016 explains passive fail safe biasing by resistor networks in RS-485 systems in his EDN article.

 

RelatedPosts

ECIA Industry Pulse Moderates as Passive Lead Times Tighten

LG Innotek Demonstrates FC-BGA Substrates With Embedded Silicon Capacitors for AI Power Delivery

On-Chip 3D-Printed Copper Microinductors: A New Route to Compact RF Electronics

With RS-485 networks, there are periods of time when no driver is actively driving the bus, such as when one driver relinquishes the bus to another driver. During this time, the termination resistors collapse the differential bus voltage to 0V, which is an undefined input level for many RS-485 receivers. Faced with this undefined input, a receiver might output the wrong logic state or worse yet, it might oscillate. The oscillation may be interpreted as an endless stream of message start bits, causing the controller to waste valuable bandwidth trying to service these phantom messages. Fail-safe bus biasing is one way to alleviate this problem.

Passive fail-safe biasing is accomplished through resistor networks of pull-up, termination, and pull-down resistors whose voltage divider action provide a differential dc bus voltage, VAB, when no driver is actively driving the bus (see Figure 1).

 Figure 1: Passive fail-safe biasing network for short to medium bus distance

To drive all receiver outputs to the defined idle state of a logic high, VAB must be higher than the maximum input threshold, VIT-MAX. In addition, sufficient noise margin should be added to allow for operation in harsh industrial environments, thus making VAB = VIT-MAX + VNoise.

This article helps system engineers design successful fail-safe biasing networks by providing equations for calculating the resistor values and the maximum possible bus loading caused by transceivers for single and dual fail-safe terminations. We also present the ISL315x family of high VOD transceivers, whose common-mode 60 unit loads (ULs) drive capability far exceeds the 32 ULs of standard transceivers.

 Single Fail-safe Biasing Network Design

For short network distances of ≤ 100m and low- to medium-idle bus voltages of 0.05V ≤ VAB ≤ 0.3V, fail-safe biasing at one bus end will often suffice. For simplification, the network shown in Figure 1 is converted into the lumped equivalent circuit of Figure 2. Note the bias resistors, RB, and the termination resistors, RT1, and RT2. REQ representing the equivalent input resistance of all transceivers connected to the bus.

 

Figure 2: Lumped equivalent model of Figure 1 circuit

Prior to deriving the equations for calculating the resistor values, we establish the conditions that must be satisfied for line termination and common-mode loading.

 

1)  The cable end without the biasing network is terminated with RT1, whose value should match the characteristic impedance of the cable, Z0.

2)  For line impedance matching during normal operation, the series combination of the two biasing resistors in parallel with the termination resistor, RT2, must match the characteristic cable impedance: Z0 = 2RB||RT2. Thus, for a given value of RB, RT2 becomes:

3)     RS-485 specifies the maximum common-mode load, which a standard compliant transceiver must be able to drive with 32 parallel ULs. One unit load represents a minimum common-mode resistance of around 12kΩ between each signal conductor and ground. Thus, the total common-mode loading of 32 ULs results in a minimum common-mode resistance of RCM = 375Ω.

Because the bias resistors present a common-mode load in addition to the equivalent transceiver input resistance, the parallel combination of RB and REQ must be greater or equal to RCM: RB||REQ ≥ RCM. For a given RB value, REQ is therefore limited to:

To find the equation for calculating RB, we determine the node currents of A and B in Figure 2, and solve for the individual line voltages, VA and VB.


Then calculating the difference between the line voltages provides the differential bus voltage:

Inserting EQs. 1, 2 and 3 into EQ. 4 provides the final equation for the dc-bus idle voltage:

And solving for RB yields the minimum required bias resistor value:

 

 

Common-Mode Loading

Because passive fail-safe biasing presents additional common-mode loading, it is necessary to determine the maximum number of transceiver unit loads, nUL, that can load the bus without dropping below RCM = 375Ω.

nUL is the ratio of the common-mode resistance of one unit load to the common-mode resistance of the transceiver unit load: nUL = 12kΩ / REQ, and inserting EQ. 3 for REQ yields:


This maximum number of transceiver unit loads can be accomplished using n x 1UL, 2n x 1/2UL, 4n x 1/4UL, or 8n x 1/8UL transceivers.

 Dual Fail-safe Biasing

To maintain a constant VAB over long cable lengths, fail-safe biasing at both bus ends is necessary. Each biasing network compensates for the loss of biasing the other network along the cable run.

Figure 3 shows the lumped equivalent circuit of a bus with dual fail-safe biasing.

Figure 3: Lumped equivalent model for dual fail-safe biasing

The requirements for the termination resistors, RT, are the same as for RT2 in the single fail-safe biasing network demanding that Z0 = 2RB||RT. Hence, for a given RB, RT must be:

However, the condition for common-mode loading changes because each conductor now sees two biasing resistors in parallel to ground. Thus, the parallel combination of RB/2 and REQ needs to be greater or equal to RCM: RB/2 || REQ ≥ RCM. Hence, for a given RB value, REQ is limited to:

To find the equation for RB, we determine the node currents into A and B. Because the biasing networks are identical, they drive the same amount of current through REQ. Therefore, we have to establish only one current through REQ and multiply it by a factor of two to determine VAB in the middle of the bus.


Solving the node currents for the individual line voltages, VA and VB, and calculating the difference between them provides the differential bus voltage:

Inserting EQs. 8 and 9 into EQ. 10 provides the final equation for VAB:

And solving for RB yields the minimum required bias resistor value:

With RB in place, the maximum number of transceiver unit loads can now be calculated via:

Note, because the RB value for dual failsafe biasing is twice the RB value for single fail-safe biasing, nUL remains the same for both applications.

Calculation Examples

In the following examples, we calculate the resistor values for the single and dual fail-safe biasing networks of a short and a long data link assuming a characteristic impedance of Z0 = 120Ω. The ISL8487E bus transceiver is used in this example. This device is a 1/8 UL transceiver with a minimum supply of Vs = 4.75V. Its maximum receiver input threshold is 200mV which, assuming a 100mV noise margin, requires an idle bus voltage of VAB = 300mV.

 Transceiver Selection

Selecting the best transceiver to address noise immunity and output drive capability is important for robust network design for two reasons.

  1.  During times when the bus is not actively driven, there should be sufficient noise margin to prevent a receiver from false triggering, even in very noisy environments.
  2. During normal data transmission, the active driver must be able to drive the added common-mode load created by fail-safe biasing and still provide a signal with sufficient noise margin to remote transceivers.

For example, the first-generation ISL8487E device has a positive receiver input threshold of VIT-max = 200mV. Adding just a small noise margin of 50mV makes VAB = 200mV + 50mV = 250mV.

Compare this to a second-generation transceiver, such as the ISL83082E with full fail-safe capability. Its receiver output turns high whether the receiver inputs are floating (bus open) or shorted (bus short or idle).

Full fail-safe capability is accomplished by offsetting the maximum input threshold to a slightly negative level, in this case -50mV. To provide the same 50 mV noise margin, a VAB of 0V is sufficient for eliminating the need for external fail-safe biasing. Without a biasing network, all 32 unit loads are available to the bus transceivers.

In modern industrial applications with high electrical noise pollution, industrial networks, such as PROFIBUS, use dual fail-safe biasing with idle bus voltages of 0.6V and more. VAB levels that high require the bias resistors to be of such low resistance that their combined value drops far below the minimum common-mode resistance of 375Ω. When this happens, the calculation of nUL will result in negative values. In fact, it is possible to calculate the maximum VAB (when nUL = 0) by making RB/2 = RCM in EQ. 12 and solving for VAB:

Hence, networks requiring high VAB levels need dedicated transceivers that provide much higher differential and common-mode drive capability than standard compliant transceivers.

One transceiver series able to meet these demands is Intersil’s ISL315x family of large VOD transceivers. These devices are capable of driving up to eight 120Ω terminations in parallel at a minimum differential output of VOD-MIN = 1.5V, (see Figure 4) and more than 60 dc-unit loads over a common-mode voltage range from -7V to +12V at a minimum VOD of 2.4V (see Figure 5).

Figure 4: Differential output drive capability, ISL315x vs standard RS-485 transceivers

Figure 5: Common-mode output drive capability, ISL315x vs standard RS-485 transceivers
The ISL315x’s superior output drive capability provides enhanced noise immunity even to the most remote bus transceiver, while enabling twice the common-mode loading compared to standard RS-485 transceivers.

Table 1 lists the resistor values for single and dual fail-safe biasing networks and compares the available transceiver unit loads for two standard transceivers, ISL8487 and ISL83082, and the high-VOD transceiver, ISL3152, as a function of noise margin.

 Table 1. Resistor values and unit loads for standard and high VOD transceivers as a function of noise margin

 

Transceivers with 200mV input threshold, such as the ISL8487, only allow for low idle-bus noise margins of up to 100mV. Beyond that, the required rise in VAB demands the bias resistor values to be so low that the resulting numbers in transceiver unit loads turns negative.

Full fail-safe transceivers, such as the ISL83082, require much lower VAB values due to their negative input threshold of -50mV. This allows for much higher bias resistor values and consequently higher numbers of required bus transceivers. Both transceiver types however have standard drive capability of up to 32 unit loads, which limits their use in noisy environments to networks with standard noise margins and low transceiver counts.

In strong contrast, the ISL3152, with its high VOD, easily drives more than twice the transceiver count at medium noise levels and still manages to support up to 100 transceivers at 600mV noise margin. To accomplish even higher noise margins, an increase in the characteristic cable impedance is necessary. This is done in PROFIBUS where Z0 = 150Ω, thus necessitating higher values for RT and RB to lower common-mode loading of the biasing networks.

 Conclusion

Creating a fail-safe biasing network ensures stable network node operation during periods of time when the bus is not actively driven. In addition, the common-mode loading caused by the bias resistors must be driven by an active driver during normal data transmission. The high noise margins required in industrial networks demand low bias resistor values whose common-mode load can overburden the drive capability of standard RS-485 transceivers. This problem can be alleviated with the ISL315x family of large output voltage-swing transceivers, capable of driving up to eight 120Ω terminations and more than 60 dc-unit loads. In combination with the equations provided in this article, these transceivers ease and accelerate the design of fail-safe biasing networks.

Related

Recent Posts

Compact inductive rotary position encoder sensor near a motor shaft, representing the Vishay RAIK045I MP encoder category

Vishay Introduces 16-Bit Inductive Encoder for Motor-Adjacent Position Sensing

9.9.2026
11

Bourns Releases Low-Profile Incremental Ring Encoder Targets Compact Industrial HMIs

7.9.2026
4

August 2026 Interconnect, Passives and Electromechanical Components Market Insights

4.9.2026
37

Vishay Thin Film Chip Resistors Combine up to 50 GHz Operation with High Power Density

3.9.2026
15

Bourns Expands 12 mm SMD Incremental Encoder with Shaft-Length Options for Compact HMI Controls

1.9.2026
13

Bourns UT-A Wirewound Power Resistors Target High-Temperature and Pulse-Load Applications

31.8.2026
24

Modelithics COMPLETE v26.4 Expands RF Passive Models for Keysight ADS

28.8.2026
14

Bourns Extends Current Sense Resistors for High-Current Power Designs with 0.1 mΩ, 15 W

26.8.2026
45

Vishay Releases High-Power Thick Film Resistors for Compact Power Modules

24.8.2026
32

Upcoming Events

Sep 16
17:00 - 18:00 CEST

Designing a 5 kW, 800 V-to-50 V PSFB Converter for Next-Generation Data Centers

Sep 29
16:00 - 17:00 CEST

Cybersecurity 2026

Nov 24
16:00 - 17:00 CET

Component selection with the WE REDEXPERT® DC-DC Converter Designer Tool

View Calendar

Popular Posts

  • Buck Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • LLC Resonant Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Boost Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Flyback Converter Design and Calculation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Earthing Systems and IEC Classification Explained

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • MLCC and Ceramic Capacitors

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Resistor Symbols

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Capacitor Charging and Discharging

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Audio Capacitors: Choosing Capacitors for Crossover Circuits

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Thermistors Basics, NTC and PTC Thermistors

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Newsletter Subscription

 

Passive Components Blog

© 2015–2026
All rights reserved

  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • EPCI Membership & Advertisement
  • About

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Knowledge Blog
  • Dossiers
  • PCNS

© 2015–2026
All rights reserved